The molecular vista: current perspectives on molecules and life in the twentieth century

Abir-Am, P. G. (1982). The discourse of physical power and biological knowledge in the 1930s: A reappraisal of the rockefeller foundation’s ‘Policy’ in molecular biology. Social Studies of Science, 12, 341–382. Abir-Am, P. G. (1992). The politics of macromolecules: Molecular biologists, biochemists, and rhetoric. Osiris, 7, 164–191. https://doi.org/10.1086/368709. Abir-Am, P. G. (2014) Crafting Women Scientists of the 1970s: An Ego-Histoire of a Lost Generation. In: Govoni, Paola, and Zelda Alice Franceschi. Writing about Lives in Science: (Auto)Biography, Gender, and Genre (pp. 223–259). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2014. Ankeny, R. A. (2010). Historiographic reflections on model organisms: or how the Mureaucracy may be limiting our understanding of contemporary genetics and genomics. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 32(1), 91–104. Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli., S. (2019). Organisms in Experimental Research. In M. R. Dietrich, M. E. Borrello, & O. S. Harman (Eds.), Handbook of the Historiography of Biology (pp. 1–25). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. Baedke, J., & Nieves Delgado, A. (2019). Race and nutrition in the new world: Colonial shadows in the age of epigenetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 76, 101175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.03.004. Baedke, J., Fábregas-Tejeda, A., & Nieves Delgado, A. (2020). The Holobiont concept before Margulis. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 334(3), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22931. Berry, D. J. (2019). Making DNA and its becoming an experimental commodity. History and Technology, 35(4), 374–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1694125. Blanchette, A. (2020). Porkopolis: American animality, standardized life, and the factory farm. Durham: Duke University Press. Boniolo, G., & Nathan, M. J. (Eds.). (2017). Philosophy of Molecular Medicine: Foundational Issues in Research and Practice. New York: Routledge. Brandt, C. (2005). Genetic code, text, and scripture: metaphors and narration in German Molecular Biology. Science in Context, 18(4), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889705000694. Burian, R. M. (1996). “The Tools of the Discipline: Biochemists and Molecular Biologists”: A comment. Journal of the History of Biology, 29(3), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127384. Creager, A. N. H. (2002). The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Creager, A. N. H. (2009). Phosphorus-32 in the phage group: Radioisotopes as historical tracers of molecular biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40, 29–42. Creager, A. N. H. (2017). A chemical reaction to the historiography of biology. Ambix, 64(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2017.1412136. Creager, A. N. H., & Morgan, G. J. (2008). After the double helix. Isis, 99(2), 239–272. https://doi.org/10.1086/588626. Curry, H. A. (2014). From garden biotech to garage biotech: Amateur experimental biology in historical perspective. The British Journal for the History of Science, 47(3), 539–565. Davies, G., Gorman, R., Greenhough, B., Hobson-West, P., Kirk, R. G. W., Message, R., et al. (2020). Animal research nexus: A new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare. Medical Humanities, 46(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2019-011778. de Chadarevian, S. (2002). Designs for Life: Molecular Biology after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. de Chadarevian, S. (2018). Things and data in recent biology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 48(5), 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2018.48.5.648. de Chadarevian, S. (2020). Heredity under the Microscope: Chromosomes and the Study of the Human Genome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. de Chadarevian, S., & Gaudillière, J.-P. (1996). The tools of the discipline: biochemists and molecular biologists. Journal of the History of Biology, 29(3), 327–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/4331402. de Chadarevian, S., & Kamminga, H. (1998). Molecularizing Biology and Medicine: New Practices and Alliances, 1910s–1970s. Amsterdam: Harwood. de Chadarevian, S., & Rheinberger, H.-J. (2009). Introduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. Special Issue: Disciplinary histories and the history of disciplines: the challenge of molecular biology, 40(1), 4–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.001. Deichmann, U. (2007). “Molecular” versus “colloidal”: controversies in biology and biochemistry. Bulletin of the History of Chemistry, 32, 105–118. Delbrück, M. (2007). A Physicist Looks at Biology. In J. Cairns, G. S. Stent, & J. O. Watson (Eds.), Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology (pp. 9–22). Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory of Quantitative Biology: Cold Spring Harbour. Dietrich, M. R., Ankeny, R. A., Crowe, N., Green, S., & Leonelli, S. (2020). How to choose your research organism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 80, 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101227. Dupré, J., & O’Malley, M. A. (2013). Varieties of Living Things: Life at the Intersection of Lineage and Metabolism. In S. Normandin & C. T. Wolfe (Eds.), Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010 (pp. 311–343). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2445-7_13 Fischer, M. M. J. (2013). Biopolis: Asian science in the global circuitry. Science, Technology and Society, 18(3), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721813498500. Friese, C. (2018). Co-producing Animal Models and Genetic Science (pp. 273–282). Routledge Handbook of Genomics: Health and Society. Fruton, J. S. (1972). Molecules and Life: Historical Essays on the Interplay of Chemistry and Biology. New York: Wiley-Interscience. García-Sancho, M., & Myelnikov, D. (2019). Between mice and sheep: Biotechnology, agricultural science and animal models in late-twentieth century Edinburgh. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 75, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.01.002. Green, S., Dietrich, M. R., Leonelli, S., & Ankeny, R. A. (2018). ‘Extreme’ organisms and the problem of generalization: Interpreting the Krogh Principle. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(4), 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0231-0. Green, S., Carusi, A., & Hoeyer, K.. (2019). Plastic diagnostics: The remaking of disease and evidence in personalized medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 112318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.023 Grote, M. (2019). Membranes to Molecular Machines. Active Matter and the Remaking of Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Hartley, J. M., & Tansey, E. M. (2015). White coats and no trousers: Narrating the experiences of women technicians in medical laboratories, 1930–90. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 69(1), 25–36. Helmreich, S. (1998). Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press. Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018). A guide to ancient protein studies. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(5), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x. Hicks, M. (2018). Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost its Edge in Computing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Holmes, F. L. (1974). Claude Bernard and Animal Chemistry: The Emergence of a Scientist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ibáñez Martín, R., & de Laet, M. (2018). Geographies of fat waste. Or, how kitchen fats make citizens. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117726731 James, J. L. (2007). Naturalizing the chemical bond: Discipline and creativity in the Pauling program, 1927–1942. (Ph.D. dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Jiang, L., & Stevens, H. (2015). Chinese biotech versus international ethics? Accounting for the China-America CRISPR ethical divide. BioSocieties, 10, 483–488. Kamminga, H., & Cunningham, A. (1995). The Science and Culture of Nutrition, 1840–1940. Amsterdam & Atlanta GA: Rodopi. Kay, L. E. (1988). Laboratory technology and biological knowledge: The Tiselius electrophoresis apparatus, 1930–1945. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 10, 51–72. Kay, L. E. (1993). The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology. New York: Oxford University Press. Kay, L. E. (2000). Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Keller, E. F. (1990). Physics and the emergence of molecular biology: A history of cognitive and political synergy. Journal of the History of Biology, 23(3), 389–409. Kendrew, J. C. (1967). How molecular biology started. Scientific American,, 216, 141–144. Keller, E. F. (1995). Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. Columbia University Press. Kohler, R. E. (1976). The management of science: The experience of Warren Weaver and the Rockefeller Foundation Programme in molecular biology. Minerva, 14, 279–306. Kohler, R. E. (1982). From Medical Chemistry to Biochemistry: The Making of a Biomedical Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kollmer, C. A. (2020). From Elephant to Bacterium: Microbial Culture Techniques and Chemical Orders of Nature. Ph.D. dissertation. Princeton: Princeton University. Landecker, H. (2011). Food as exposure: Nutritional epigenetics and the new metabolism. BioSocieties, 6(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2011.1. Landecker, H. (2013). Postindustrial metabolism: Fat knowledge. Public Culture, 25(3), 495–522. Landecker, H. (2015). Commentary: The information of conformation. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(4), 1107–1108. Landecker, H. (2016a). It is what it eats: Chemically defined media and the history of surrounds. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57, 148–160. Landecker, H. (2016b). The social as signal in the body of chromatin. The Sociological Review Monographs, 6(1), 79–99. Landecker, H. (2019). A metabolic history of manufacturing waste: Food commodities and their outsides. Food, Culture & Society, 22(5), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2019.1638110. Leonelli, S. (2016). Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leonelli, S., & Ankeny, R. A. (2013). What makes a model organism? Endeavour (New Series), 37(4), 209–212. Ling, V., & Jiang, L. (2019). A different kind of synthesis: Artificial synthesis of insulin in socialist China. History and Technology, 35(4), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1694124. Liu, D. (2017). This is the synthetic biology that is. Studies in History and Philosophy ofScience Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 63, 89–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.03.002. Liu, D. (2019). The artificial cell, the semipermeable membrane, and the life that never was, 1864–1901. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 49(5), 504–555, https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2019.49.5.504 Martin, J. D. (2018). Solid State Insurrection: How the Science of Substance Made American Physics Matter. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Mateos, G., & Suárez,E. (2014). Mexican physics and life sciences during the Cold War era. In: Medina, E., Marquez, I. and Holmes, C. (Eds.), STS in Latin America: Beyond Imported Magic. Cambridge: MIT Press. Matlin, K. S. (2016). The Heuristic of form: Mitochondrial morphology and the explanation of oxidative phosphorylation. Journal of the History of Biology, 49(1), 37–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9418-3. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Global South and World Dis/Order. Journal of Anthropological Research, 67(2), 165–188. Morange, M. (1998). A History of Molecular Biology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University. Morange, M. (2020). The Black Box of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Myers, N. (2015). Rendering Life Molecular. Durham: Duke University Press. Nelson, A. (2016a). The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, And Reconciliation After the Genome. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Nelson, N. (2016b). Model homes for model organisms: Intersections of animal welfare and behavioral neuroscience around the environment of the laboratory mouse. BioSocieties, 11, 46–66. Nyhart, L. K., & Vienne, F. (2017). Introduction to special issue: Revolutionary politics and biological organization in nineteenth-century France and Germany. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 47(5), 589–601, https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2017.47.5.589. Olby, R. (1986). Structural and Dynamic Explanations in the World of Neglected Dimensions. In T. J. Horder, J. A. Wittowski, & C. C. Wylie (Eds.), A History of Embryology: Eighth Symposium of the British Society for Developmental Biology (pp. 175–203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Onaga, L. A. (2014). Ray Wu as fifth business: Deconstructing collective memory in the history of DNA sequencing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 46, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.12.006. Onaga, L. (2021). A Matter of Taste: Making artificial silkworm food in 20th century Japan. In L. Campos, M. R. Dietrich, T. Saraiva, & C. Young (Eds.) Nature Remade: Engineering Life, Envisioning Worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Oudshoorn, N. (1990). On the making of sex hormones: Research materials and the production of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 20(1), 5–33. Rader, K. A. (2004). Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Rasmussen, N. (1997a). Picture Control: The Electron Microscope and the Transformation of Biology in America, 1940–1960. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Rasmussen, N. (1997b). The mid-century biophysics bubble: Hiroshima and the biological revolution in America, revisited. History of Science, 35(109), 245–293. Ratti, E. (2020). ‘Models of’ and ‘Models for’: On the relation between mechanistic models and experimental strategies in molecular biology. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71(2), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy018. Reinhardt, C. (2017). ‘This Other Method’: The dynamics of NMR in biochemistry and molecular biology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 47(3), 389–422. Reinhardt, C. (2018). Introduction to ‘What’s In a Name? Chemistry as a nonclassical approach to the World. Isis, 109, 559–564. Reynolds, A. S. (2018). The Third Lens: Metaphor and the Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2009). Recent science and its exploration: The case of molecular biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.12.002. Richardson, S. S., & Stevens, H. (2015). Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology After the Genome. Durham: Duke University Press. Roosth, S. (2017). Synthetic: How Life Got Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Roy, D. (2018). Molecular Feminisms: Biology, Becomings, and Life in the Lab. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Santesmases, M. J. (2016). The bacterial cell wall in the antibiotic era: An ontology in transit between morphology and metabolism, 1940s–1960s. Journal of the History of Biology, 49(1), 3–36. Santesmases, M. J. (2020). Women in early human cytogenetics: An essay on a gendered history of chromosome imaging. Perspectives on Science, 28(2), 170–200. Santesmases, M. J., & Suárez-Díaz, E. (2015). A cell-based epistemology: Human genetics in the era of biomedicine. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 45(1), 1–13. Schmitt, F. O. (1944). Tissue Ultrastructure Analysis: Polarized Light Method. In O. Glasser (Ed.), Medical Physics (Vol. 3, pp. 1586–1591). Chicago: The Year Book Publishers. Schürch, C. (2017). How mechanisms explain interfield cooperation: Biological-chemical study of plant growth hormones in Utrecht and Pasadena, 1930–1938. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 39(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0144-3. Schwartz, R. P. (2004). Why did physicists get all the credit: The Smyth report as authorized history of the atomic bomb. Chemical Heritage, 22(3), 32–33. Schwartz, R. P. (2008). The Making of the History of the Atomic Bomb: Henry Dewolf Smyth and the Historiography of the Manhattan Project. Ph.D. dissertation. Princeton: Princeton University. Serafini, A. (1989). Linus Pauling: A Man and His Science. New York: Paragon House. Sloan, P. R., & Fogel, B. (2011). Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and Early Molecular Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Spanier, B. (1995). Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Stevens, H. (2013). Life Out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Stoff, H. (2012). Wirkstoffe: Eine Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Hormone, Vitamine und Enzyme, 1920–1970. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. Strasser, B. (2010). Collecting, comparing, and computing sequences: The making of Margaret O. Dayhoff’s “Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure”, 1954–1965. Journal of the History of Biology, 43(4), 623–660. Strasser, B. J. (2019). Collecting Experiments: Making Big Data Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sykes, N. (2014). Beastly Questions: Animal Answers to Archaeological Issues. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Tracy, S. E. (2018). Delicious molecules: Big food science, the chemosenses, and Umami. The Senses and Society, 13(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2017.1420027. Tracy, S. E. (2019). Tasty waste: Industrial fermentation and the creative destruction of MSGG. Food, Culture & Society, 22(5), 1–18. Tracy, S. E., & Landecker, H. (forthcoming). Fat Mice: Revisiting Umami, Monosodium Glutamate, and the Molecular Gut. Wailoo, K. (2001). Dying in the City of the Blues: Sickle Cell Anemia and the Politics of Race and Health. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Wailoo, K., & Pemberton, S. G. (2006). The Troubled Dream of Genetic Medicine: Ethnicity and Innovation in Tay-Sachs, Cystic Fibrosis, and Sickle Cell Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Zulueta, B. C. (2009). Master of the master gland: Choh Hao Li, the University of California, and science, migration, and race. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 39(2), 129–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2009.39.2.129.