The market for patents in Europe
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anand, 2000, The structure of licensing contracts, Journal of Industrial Economics, 48, 103, 10.1111/1467-6451.00114
Arora, 1995, Licensing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4, 41, 10.1080/10438599500000013
Arora, 1996, Contracting for tacit knowledge: the provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts, Journal of Development Economics, 50, 233, 10.1016/S0304-3878(96)00399-9
Arora, 2006, Patent protection, complementary assets, and firms’ incentives for technology licensing, Management Science, 52, 293, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0437
Arora, 2003, Licensing the market for technology, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52, 277, 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00002-7
Arora, 2001
Arora, 1990, Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology, Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, 361, 10.2307/2098345
Arora, 1994, The changing technology of technical change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour, Research Policy, 23, 523, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01003-X
Arora, 2004, Specialized supply firms, property rights and firm boundaries, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 451, 10.1093/icc/dth018
Athreye, 2005
Barney, 1986, Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, 32, 1231, 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
Baron, 2002, Organizational blueprints for success in high-tech start-ups, California Management Review, 44, 8, 10.2307/41166130
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., Malerba, F., 1998. Knowledge Proximity and Technological Diversification. TSER Project: ISE-Innovation Systems in Europe, IV Framework Programme, EC-DG XII.
Bresnahan, 1998, The division of inventive labor and the extent of the market, 253
British Technology Group (BTG), 1998. IPR Market Benchmark Study. www.btgplc.com.
Cesaroni, 2003, Technology strategies in the knowledge economy: the licensing activity of Himont, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 1, 10.1142/S1363919603000805
Chesbrough, 2002
Cohen, 1989, Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99, 569, 10.2307/2233763
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper no. 7522.
David, 1993, Knowledge, property, and the system dynamics of technological change
David, 1993, Intellectual property institutions and the panda's thumb: patents, copyrights, and trade secrets in economic theory and history, 19
David, 1998, Common agency contracting and the emergence of ‘Open Science’ institutions, American Economic Review, 88, 15
Fosfuri, A., 2004. The Licensing Dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of licensing. Working Paper 04-15, Business Economic Series. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Freeman, 1997
Gallini, 1984, Deterrence by market sharing: a strategic incentive for licensing, American Economic Review, 74, 931
Gallini, 2002, The economics of patents: lessons from recent US patent reform, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 131, 10.1257/0895330027292
Gambardella, 1998, Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry, Research Policy, 27, 445, 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00062-6
Gans, 2002, When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction, RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 571, 10.2307/3087475
Gilbert, 1982, Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly, American Economic Review, 72, 514
Giuri, 2004, Technological diversification and strategic alliances, 116
Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Brusoni, S., Crespi, G., Francoz, D., Gambardella, A., Garcia-Fontes, W., Geuna, A., Gonzales, R., Harhoff, D., Hoisl, K., Lebas, C., Luzzi, A., Magazzini, L., Nesta, L., Nomaler, O., Palomeras, N., Patel, P., Romanelli, M., Verspagen, B., 2007. Inventors and invention processes in Europe. Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy, this issue.
Granstrand, 1997, Multi-technology corporations: why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies, California Management Review, 39, 8, 10.2307/41165908
Green, 1995, On the division of profit in sequential innovation, RAND Journal of Economics, 26, 20, 10.2307/2556033
Grindley, 1996, Licensing and business strategies in the chemical industry, 97
Grindley, 1997, Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics, California Management Review, 39, 1, 10.2307/41165885
Hall, 2001, The patent paradox revisited, an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995, RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 101, 10.2307/2696400
Harhoff, 2004, Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants—the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 443, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.01.001
Hinze, S., Reiss, T., Schmoch, U., 1997. Statistical Analysis on the Distance Between Fields of Technology. Report for European Commission TSER Project, September.
Kollmer, 2004, Licensing as a commercialisation strategy for new technology-based firms, Research Policy, 33, 1141, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.04.005
Lamoreaux, 1998, Inventors, firms, and the market for technology: US manufacturing in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, 19
Lanjouw, 2004, Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators, Economic Journal, 114, 441, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
Lerner, 1994, The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis, RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 319, 10.2307/2555833
Merges, 1990, On the complex economics of patent scope, Columbia Law Review, 90, 839, 10.2307/1122920
Meyer, 1986, New product strategy in small technology-based firms: a pilot study, Management Science, 32, 806, 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.806
Nakamura, K., Odagiri, H., 2003. Determinants of R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Study of Commissioned R&D, Joint R&D, and Licensing with Japanese Company Data. NISTEP, Discussion Paper No. 32.
OECD, 2005. Intellectual Property as an Economic Asset: Key Issues in Valuation and Exploitation. OECD, Paris.
Palomeras, N., 2003. Sleeping patents: any reason to wake up? IESE Research Papers No. D/506.
Patel, 1997, The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety, Research Policy, 26, 141, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
Peteraf, 1993, The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179, 10.1002/smj.4250140303
Prahalad, 1990, The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, 79
Razgaitis, 2004, US/Canadian licensing in 2003: survey results, Journal of the Licensing Executive Society, 34, 139
Reitzig, 2004, The private values of ‘thickets’ and ‘fences’, towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 13, 457, 10.1080/1043859042000188719
Rivette, 2000, Discovering new value in intellectual property, Harvard Business Review, 78, 54
Rockett, 1990, Choosing the competition and patent licensing, RAND Journal of Economics, 21, 161, 10.2307/2555501
Rosenberg, 1986
Rumelt, 1984, Towards a strategic theory of the firm, 556
Sampat, 2003
Scotchmer, 1991, Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 29, 10.1257/jep.5.1.29
Shane, 2003, Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship, Research Policy, 32, 181, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00104-X
Shephard, 1987, Licensing to enhance demand for new technologies, RAND Journal of Economics, 18, 360, 10.2307/2555601
Stuart, 1999, Inter-organizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315, 10.2307/2666998
Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
The Economist, 2005. A Market for Ideas: A Survey of Patents and Technologies October 22, pp. 1–20.