The many faces of information technology interruptions: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects

Information Systems Journal - Tập 25 Số 3 - Trang 231-273 - 2015
Shamel Addas1, Alain Pinsonneault2
1IESEG School of Management, LEM, CNRS, Lille, France
2Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Despite the growing importance of information technology (IT) interruptions for individual work, very little is known about their nature and consequences. This paper develops a taxonomy that classifies interruptions based on the relevance and structure of their content, and propositions that relate different interruption types to individual performance. A qualitative approach combining the use of log diaries of professional workers and semi‐structured interviews with product development workers provide a preliminary validation of the taxonomy and propositions and allow for the discovery of a continuum of interruption events that fall in‐between the extreme types in the taxonomy. The results show that some IT interruptions have positive effects on individual performance, whilst others have negative effects, or both. The taxonomy developed in the paper allows for a better understanding of the nature of different types of IT interruption and their consequences on individual work. By showing that different types of interruptions have different effects, the paper helps to explain and shed light on the inconsistent results of past research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamczyk P.D.&Bailey B.P.(2004)If not now when? The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems Vienna Austria.

Addas S.&Pinsonneault A.(2013)Electronic messaging interruptions and individual performance: a tale of two interruption types working paper.

Ang S., 1993, The effects of information technology and the perceived mood of the feedback giver on feedback seeking, Information Systems Research, 4, 240, 10.1287/isre.4.3.240

10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.009

Bailey B.P. Konstan J.A.&Carlis J.V.(2001)The effects of interruptions on task performance annoyance and anxiety in the user interface. In: Proceedings of the 8th IFIP International Conference on Human‐Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2001) Tokyo Japan.

10.1287/orsc.1100.0573

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60211-7

10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_4

Brixey J.M. Walji M. Zhang J. Johnson T.R.&Turley J.P.(2004)Proposing a taxonomy and model of interruption. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in the Healthcare Industry (Healthcom 2004) Odawara Japan.

10.1287/isre.1120.0446

10.1016/0030-5073(82)90221-5

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00434.x

Cutrell E.B. Czerwinski M.&Horvitz E.(2000)Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems The Hague Netherlands.

Czerwinski M. Cutrell E.&Horvitz E.(2000)Instant messaging: effects of relevance and time. In: Proceedings of HCI Sunderland UK.

Dabbish L.A.&Kraut R.E.(2004)Controlling interruptions: awareness displays and social motivation for coordination. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Chicago IL.

10.1287/isre.1080.0175

Dabbish L.A. Kraut R.E. Fussell S.&Kiesler S.(2005)Understanding email use: predicting action on a message. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Portland OR.

10.2307/25148857

10.1145/382899.383305

10.1016/0749-5978(88)90046-5

10.2307/256353

10.1037/h0047707

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.015

Gievska S. Lindeman R.&Sibert J.(2005)Examining the qualitative gains of mediating human interruptions during HCI. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human‐Computer Interaction Las Vegas NV.

Goldkuhl G.(2001)Communicative vs material actions: instrumentality sociality and comprehensibility. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on the Language‐Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2001) Montreal Canada.

10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.035

10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.009

Hemp P., 2009, Death by information overload, Harvard Business Review, 87, 82

Ho J.&Intille S.S.(2005)Using context‐aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Portland OR.

10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349

Iqbal S.T.&Horvitz E.(2007)Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study analysis and directions. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems San Jose CA.

10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00068-3

10.2307/30040736

Kahneman D., 1973, Attention and Effort

Kapitsa M., 2003, Operator Functional State: The Assessment and Prediction of Human Performance Degradation in Complex Tasks, 323

10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008

10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01321.x

10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Langer E.J., 1989, Mindfulness

Latorella K.A.(1999)Investigating interruptions: implications for flightdeck performance Industrial Engineering Department Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation State University of New York NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI).

10.1177/001872679104400104

10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00022-3

10.1002/acp.1002

McFarlane D.C.(1997)Interruption of people in human‐computer interaction: a general unifying definition of human interruption and taxonomy InNRL Formal ReportNaval Research Laboratory Washington DC.

10.1207/S15327051HCI1701_2

10.1080/10304310701268695

Miller S.L.(2002)Window of opportunity: using the interruption lag to manage disruption in complex tasks. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Baltimore MD.

Monk C.A., 2008, The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 299

O'Conaill B.&Frohlich D.(1995)Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Denver CO.

10.1287/orsc.13.4.370.2947

10.5465/AMR.2011.61031807

10.1080/01449290310001644859

Patton M.Q., 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods

10.2307/2667031

Ratwani R.M. Andrews A.E. McCurry M. Trafton J.G.&Peterson M.S.(2007)Using peripheral processing and spatial memory to facilitate task resumption. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Baltimore MD.

Robertson T.J. Prabhakararao S. Burnett M. Cook C. Ruthruff J.R. Beckwith L.&Phalgune A.(2004)Impact of interruption style on end‐user debugging. In: Proceedings of the CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vienna Austria.

Rukab J.A., 2004, A framework of interruptions in distributed team environments, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 107, 1282

10.1037/a0019968

Speier C. Valacich J.S.&Vessey I.(1997)The effects of task interruption and information presentation on individual decision making. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems Atlanta GA.

10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02292.x

10.1348/000712605X62768

Weick K.E., 1990, Technology and Organizations, 1

10.1080/14639220210123806

10.1177/0021886398341002

Yin R.K., 2009, Case Study Research, Design and Methods

10.1287/mnsc.49.4.514.14423

10.1348/096317999166581