The linkers contribution to technology transfer
Tóm tắt
The role of an individual known as a ‘linker’ is examined and the similarities between his role and those of ‘gatekeeper’, ‘opinion leader’, and ‘innovator’ are discussed in detail. Not only are the similarities among these roles pointed out but also the unique characteristics of the ‘linker’ are clarified. A Linker Model for Technology Transfer is presented showing the value of a ‘linker’ to the parent and users organizations. Managerial endeavors to understand and promote technology transfer can be facilitated by the in-depth research presented.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, T.J., “Communication Networks in R&D Laboratories,”R&D Management, Vol. 1, 1970, pp. 14–21.
Allen, T.J., “The Differential Performance of Information Channels in the Transfer of Technology,” Cambridge, MA: Alfred P. Sloan, School of Management, 1968, pp. 1–628.
Claasen, S.H., “Technology Transfer as Applied to 6vernment Service Employees of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command and Computed to Naval Officers of the Civil Engineering Corps,” Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, Masters Thesis, 1973.
Creighton, J.W., J.A. Jolly and S.A. Denning, “Enhancement of Research and Development Output Utilization Efficiencies: Linkers Concept Methodology in the Technology Transfer Process,” Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, NPS-55CF-2061A, 1972.
Czepiel, J.A., “Word-of-Mouth Processes in the Diffusion of a Major Technological Innovation,”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. II, May 1974, pp. 172–180.
Farr, R.S., “Knowledge Linkers and the Flow of Education Information,” Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research, September 1969.
Fontz, C.R. and M.P. Shoemaker, “Technology-Transfer as Applied to Chief Radiomen in the United States Navy and Computed to Naval Officers of the Civil Engineering Corps,” Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, Masters Thesis, 1975.
Gilmore, J.S., Ed., “The Environment and the Action in Technology Transfer 1970–1980,” Denver, CO: Denver Research Institute, University of Denver, 1969.
Havelock, R.G.et al, Planning for Innovation Through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1971.
Jolly, J.A. and J.W; Creighton, “Technology Transfer and Utilization Methodology: Further Analysis of the Linker Concept,” Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, NPS-55-JO74601, 1974.
Jolly, J.A., “The Technology Transfer Process: Concepts, Framework and Methodology,” Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, unpublished paper, 1974.
Jolly, J.A., J.W. Creighton, and P.A. George, “Technology Transfer Process Model and Annotated Selected Bibliography,” Sacramento, CA: California State University, 1977.
Katz, E., “The Two-Step Flow of Communications: An Up-to-Date Report on an Hypothesis,”Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 21, 1957, pp. 61–78.
Lazarfeld, P.F., B. Berelson, and H. Gaudit,The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Duell, 1948.
Rogers, Everett, “Categorizing the Adopter of Agricultural Practices,”Rural Sociology, XXIII (1958), pp. 345–54.
Rogers, E.M. and F.F.: Shoemaker,Communications of Innovation: A Cross-Cul= tural Approach, New York: Free Press of Glenco, 1971.