The liability to consumers of manufacturers of defective goods — An Australian perspective
Tóm tắt
There is an increasing tendency for consumers to regard the manufacturer as being primarily responsible for the safety and quality of consumer goods, even though in many if not most legal systems the common assumption by the consumer that the manufacturer rather than the retailer bears the primary liability for defective goods is not in fact correct. The legal position of the consumer in Australia under the general law of contract and tort is outlined as a background to the reforms made in 1978 by an important amendment to the Federal Trade Practices Act. A manufacturer (or importer) of consumer goods now is bound by statutory obligations, enforceable by the consumer, in respect of the quality of his goods. He is also bound by any express warranty given by him, and is liable where the goods require to be repaired or where replacement parts are required, but repair facilities or spare parts are not reasonably available. Except in the case of the obligations relating to the provision of spare parts and repair facilities, the manufacturer's statutory obligations cannot be excluded or limited. The Act also contains provisions limiting the time during which a consumer can commence an action against a manufacturer. Although the author considers that there are some defects in the legislation, he concludes that it represents a significant advance in the legal protection of the consumer's economic interests. There is a need for the expansion of existing mechanisms for the informal resolution of consumer claims, but the author also believes that the existence of the new legislative code setting out reasonably clearly defined rights will often in practice greatly strengthen the position of government agencies and others in attempting to negotiate a settlement on behalf of a consumer. Damages recoverable by a consumer from a manufacturer extend to consequential losses, including death or personal injury. As a result, a measure of strict liability for personal injury caused by defective products has been imposed on manufacturers. The legislation does not, however, offer a comprehensive regime of strict liability for personal injury and many anomalous situations will arise. The author considers that there is therefore a need in Australia for a review of the whole question of strict liability for personal injury caused by defective products, although even were this to occur there would still exist a strong need for a scheme such as that discussed in the article to govern the claim of a consumer for economic losses caused by the supply of defective or inferior products.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Association Européenne d'Etudes Juridiques et Fiscales (1975). Product liability in Europe. Deventer: Kluwer.
Atiyah, P. S. (1980). The sale of goods (6th ed.). London: Pitman.
Bernitz, U. (1978). On the consumer concept and consumer protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2, 214–216.
Bourgoignie, T. (1979). New patterns of consumer protection under warranty law: Lessons from the U.S. Magnuson — Moss Warranty Act. Journal of Consumer Policy, 3, 266–280.
Dahl, B. (1979). An introduction to the product liability debate. Journal of Consumer Policy, 3, 14–28.
Fleming, J. G. (1977). The law of torts (5th ed.). Sydney: Law Book Co.
Harland, D. J. (1976). Consumer protection in Australia. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 40, 631–653.
Harland, D. J. (1977). Products liability and international trade law. Sydney Law Review, 8, 358–399.
Hayes, R. (1979). The duty of care and liability for purely economic loss. Melbourne University Law Review, 12, 79–120.
von Hippel, E. (1979). Verbraucherschutz (2. Aufl.). Tübingen: Mohr.
Micklitz, H. (1979). Produzentenhaftung — ein Problem des Verbraucherschutzes? Zeitschrift für Verbraucherpolitik, 3, 309–340.
Ontario Law Reform Commission (1972). Report on consumer warranties and guarantees in the sale of goods. Ontario: Department of Justice.
Ontario Law Reform Commission (1979a). Report on products liability. Ontario: Ministry of the Attorney General.
Ontario Law Reform Commission (1979b). Report on sale of goods. Ontario: Ministry of the Attorney General.
Orban, F. A. (1978). Product liability: A comparative legal restatement — Foreign national law and the E.E.C. Directive. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8, 342–395.
Partlett, D. (1980). Recovery of economic loss for negligence in Australia. Sydney Law Review, 9, 121–161.
Phillips, J. J. (1978–1979). A synopsis of the developing law of products liability. Drake Law Review, 28, 317–388.
Reich, N., & Micklitz, H.-W. (1980a). Consumer legislation in the E.C. countries: A comparative analysis. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Reich, N., & Micklitz, H.-W. (1980b). Verbraucherschutzrecht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. London: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Romero, L. J. (1979). The Consumer Products Warranties Act. Saskatchewan Law Review, 43, 81–192, 44, 261–338.
Schroth, P. W. (1978). Products liability. In: J. N. Hazard & W. J. Wagner (Eds.), Law in the U.S.A. in the Bicentennial era, pp. 67–89. Supplement to American Journal of Comparative Law, 26.
Taylor, G. D. S. (1979). Special procedures governing small claims in Australia. In: M. Cappelletti & J. Weisner (Eds.), Access to justice, Vol. II, Book II, pp. 595–682. Alphen aan den Rijn: Siithoff & Noordhoff.
Taperell, G. Q., Vermeesch, R. B., & Harland, D. J. (1978). Trade practices and consumer protection (2nd ed.; Supplement, 1979). Sydney: Butterworths.
Tebbens, H. D. (1980). International product liability: A study of comparative and international legal aspects of product liability. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Tochen, D. K (1979). The product liability controversy: A handbook for consumers. Washington, D. C.: Paul H. Douglas Consumer Research Center.
Trade Practices Act Review Committee (1976). Report to the Minister for Business and Consumer Affairs. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Trade Practices Commission (1980). Annual Report 1979–80. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Twerski, A. D., & Weinstein, A. S. (1978–1979). A critique of the Uniform Product Liability Law — a rush to judgment. Drake Law Review, 28, 221–257.
United Kingdom Law Commissions (1977). Liability for defective products. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (1980). 1980 Annual Report — Fiscal year 1979. Washington, D. C.
Waddams, S. M. (1980). Products liability (2nd ed.). Toronto: Carswell.