The legal protection of ideas — Part 1

Computer Law & Security Review - Tập 8 - Trang 102-110 - 1992
Grant Hammond1
1Professor of Commercial Law and Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Tài liệu tham khảo

1964 Breyer, 1970, The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs, Harv L Rev, 84, 281, 10.2307/1339714 Merges, 1988, Commercial Success and Patent Standards: Economic Perspectives on Innovation, Cal L Rev, 76, 805, 10.2307/3480538 Eisenberg, 1989, Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights, and Experimental Use, U Chi L Rev, 56, 1017, 10.2307/1599761 Vaver, 1990, Intellectual Property Today: Of Myths and Paradoxes, Can Bar Rev, 69, 98 Melville, 1952 Moby-Dick, supra, note 5 at 393. Ibid at 393–394. Sedgwick, 1962, The Tragedy of Mind, 120 Letter from H. Melville to E. Duyckink (3 March 1849). Reproduced in Moby-Dick, supra, note 5 at 569. International News Service (INS) v Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918) at 250 [hereinafter International News]. Holmes, 1963, 5 Berman, 1983 Atiyah, 1979 Statute of Monopolies (U.IC), 21 Jac. 1, c. 3. See Darcy v Allin (1602), Moo. K.B. 671, 74 E.R. 1131 (Y-B.). Whicher, 1965, The Creative Arts and the Judicial Process, 5 Kaplan, 1967 Patterson, 1968 Siebert, 1952 Feather, 1988, The History of Copyright and the Book Trade, European Intellectual Prop. Rev., 12, 377 Ricketson, 1984, The Law of Intellectual Property, 4 Hammond, 1979, The Origins of the Equitable Duty of Confidence, Anglo-American L. Rev., 71, 10.1177/147377957900800201 Boswell, 1970, 310 1959, vol 1, 486 Mackinnon, 1946, Notes on the History of English Copyright, 881 Mackinnon, 1946, Notes on the History of English Copyright, 882 Statute of Anne (UK), 8 Anne, c 19. Swift, Addison, and Steele took some part in the drafting. See Donaldson v Beckett (1774), 2 Bro PC 129, 1 ER 837 at 843. Millar v Taylor (1769), 4 Burr 2303, 98 ER 201 at 253 (ICB) [hereinafter cited to ERI. The cases include Webb v Rose (1732), 4 Buff 2330, 98 ER 216; Pop Curl (1741), 2 Atk 342, 26 ER 608 (Ch); Duke of Queensbury v Shebbeare (1758), 2 E 329, 28 ER 924 (Ch). Milsom, 1981, The Nature of Blackstone's Achievement, Ox J Leg S, 1, 1, 10.1093/ojls/1.1.1 Vandevelde, 1980, The New Property of the Nineteenth Century: The Development of Modern Concept of Property, Buffalo L Rev, 29, 325 Blackstone, 1807, vol 2, 405 Lade v Shepherd (1735), 2 Strange 1004, 93 ER 997 (KB.); Queen v Inhabitants of Hornsey (1713), 10 Mod 150, 88 ER 670 (KB). Kent, 1884, vol 3, 448 Some Judges noted the point. See Ashton J in Millar, supra, note 24 at 257; Gould J in Donaldson v Beckett, supra, note 21; Cobbett's Parliamentary History of England, vol 17 (New York: AMS Press, 1966) at 984–985. See his judgement in Millar, supra, note 24 at 257. Supra, note 24. Ibid Ibid at 230. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid at 205 Locke, 1975, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 22 Millar, supra, note at 251. Donaldson v Beckett, supra, note 21. Braudy, 1986, The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History, 370 Braudy, 1986, The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History, 371