The judgement process in evidence-based medicine and health technology assessment
Tóm tắt
This article describes the judgements used to interpret evidence in evidence-based medicine (EBM) and health technology assessment (HTA). It outlines the methods and processes of EBM and HTA. Respectively, EBM and HTA are approaches to medical clinical decision making and efficient allocation of scarce health resources. At the heart of both is a concern to review and synthesise evidence, especially evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of clinical effectiveness. The driver of the approach of both is a desire to eliminate, or at least reduce, bias. The hierarchy of evidence, which is used as an indicator of the likelihood of bias, features heavily in the process and methods of EBM and HTA. The epistemological underpinnings of EBM and HTA are explored with particular reference to the distinction between rationalism and empiricism, developed by the philosopher David Hume and elaborated by Immanuel Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason. The importance of Humian and Kantian principles for understanding the projects of EBM and HTA is considered and the ways in which decisions are made in both, within a judgemental framework originally outlined by Kant, are explored.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barnett, D., Stevens, A., Boysen, M. and Longson, C. (2009) Developing evidence based guidance for health technologies: The nice experience. In: A. Killoran and M.P. Kelly (eds.) Evidence Based Public Health: Effectiveness and Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, J. (2010) Redefining Disease. The Harveian Oration of 2010. London: Royal College of Physicians.
Black, N. (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of healthcare. British Medical Journal 312 (May): 1215–1218.
Blalock, H.M. (1970) An Introduction to Social Research. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (1966) Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. (2008) Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York.
Cochrane, A.L. (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. London: British Medical Journal/Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
Culyer, A.J. (2006) The bogus conflict between efficiency and equity. Health Economics 15 (11): 1155–1158.
Culyer, A.J., Lavers, R.J. and Williams, A. (1972) Health indicators. In: A. Shonfield and S. Shaw (eds.) Social Indicators and Social Policy. London: Heinemann.
Davidson, K. et al (2003) Evidence – based behavioral medicine: What it is and how do we achieve it? Annals of Behavioral Medicine 26 (3): 161–171.
Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O'Brien, B.J. and Stoddart, G.L. (2005) Methods for the Evaluation of Healthcare Programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drummond, M. et al (2007) Assessing the Challenges of Applying Standard Methods of Economic Evaluation to Public Health Interventions, Public Health Research Consortium, Final Report York: University of York.
Egger, M., Davey Smith, G. and Altman, B.G. (2001) Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London: BMJ Books.
Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I., Rawlins, M. and McCulloch, P. (2007) When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. British Medical Journal 334 (February): 349–351.
Greenhalgh, T. (2001) How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence Based Medicine. London: BMJ Books.
Guyer, P. (2006) Kant. London: Routledge.
Hume, D. (1748/2007) An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, P. Millican (ed. and intro.). First published 1748.
Kant, I. (1781, 1787/2007) The Critique of Pure Reason, Translated by Norman Kemp Smith, Introduction Howard Caygill, bibliography Gary Banham. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Kelly, M.P. and Moore, T.A. (2010) Making a Difference: Using the NICE Public Health Guidance and Embedding Evaluation. London: IDEA.
Kelly, M.P., Morgan, A., Ellis, S., Younger, T., Huntley, J. and Swann, C. (2010) Evidence based public health: A review of the experience of the national institute of health and clinical excellence (NICE) of developing public health guidance in England. Social Science and Medicine 71: 1056–1062.
Korner, S. (1955) Kant. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Lomas, J., Culyer, T., McCutcheon, C., McCAuley, L. and Law, S. (2005) Conceptualizing and Combining Evidence for Health System Guidance. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
Mill, J.S. (1843/1947) A System of Logic. London: New impression, Longmans, Green, 1947.
Millican, P. (2007) Introduction Hume's Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, T.A and Rutherford, D. (2012) Primary strategy learning networks: A local study of a national initiative. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, published online before print, 15 November 2011, doi: 10.1177/1741143211420612.
NICE. (2008) Social Value Judgements: Principles for the Development of NICE Guidance, 2nd edn. London: NICE, http://www.nice.org.uk/media/C18/30/SVJ2PUBLICATION2008.pdf, accessed 17 November 2011.
NICE. (2009) Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance, 2nd edn. London: NICE, http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/developingnicepublichealthguidance/publichealthguidanceprocessandmethodguides/public_health_guidance_process_and_method_guides.jsp?domedia=1&mid=F6A97CF4-19B9-E0B5-D42B4018AE84DD51, accessed 17 November 2011.
Orne, M.T. (1970) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to the demand characteristics and their implications. In: Denzin, N.K. (ed.) Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
Pawson, R. (2002) Evidence based policy: In search of a method. Evaluation 8 (2): 157–181.
Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage.
Pickstone, J.V. (2007) Working knowledges before and after circa 1800: Practices and disciplines in the history of science, technology and medicine. Isis 98 (3): 489–516.
Rawlins, M. (2008) De Testimonio: On the Evidence for Decisions About the Use of Therapeutic Interventions, The Harveian Oration of 2008. London: Royal College of Physicians.
Russell, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E. and McDonnell, J. (2008) Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 13 (1): 40–46.
Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B and Richardson, W.S. (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal 312: 71–72.
Sorensen, C., Drummond, M., Børlum Kristensen, F. and Busse, R. (2010) How can the impact of health technology assessments be enhanced? Policy brief, World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, http://bit.ly/a1NxTR, accessed 17 November 2011.
Skorupski, J. (2005) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, In: J.S. Mill and T. Honderich (eds.) 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 599–602.
Vandenbroucke, J.P. (2008) Observational research, randomised trials, and two views of medical science. PLoS Med 5 (3): e67.
Ward, A. (2006) Kant: The Three Critiques. Cambridge: Polity.
Weldon, T.D. (1958) Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon.