The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrizah, A., Zainab, A. N., Kiran, K., & Raj, R. G. (2012). LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 94(2), 721–740. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0813-7 .
Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. doi: 10.1002/asi.21062 .
Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329–342.
Barnett, P., & Lascar, C. (2012). Comparing unique title coverage of Web of Science and Scopus in Earth and atmospheric sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. doi: 10.5062/F4W37T8C .
Clermont, M., & Dyckhoff, H. (2012). Coverage of business administration literature in Google Scholar: Analysis and comparison with Econbiz, Scopus and Web of Science (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2016850). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2016850
De Groote, S. L., & Raszewski, R. (2012). Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing. Nursing Outlook, 60(6), 391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007 .
Franceschet, M. (2009). A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 83(1), 243–258. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0021-2 .
Gavel, Y., & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8–21. doi: 10.1108/14684520810865958 .
Gingras, Y. (2014). Les dérives de l’évaluation de la recherche: du bon usage de la bibliométrie. Paris: Raisons d’agir.
Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Information Processing and Management, 35(1), 31–44. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00028-4 .
Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2011). Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 284–294. doi: 10.1002/asi.21458 .
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1991). Epistemic cultures: Forms of reason in science. History of Political Economy, 23(1), 105–122.
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scientometrics, 74(2), 273–294. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0217-x .
Larivière, V., Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagné, É. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997–1004. doi: 10.1002/asi.20349 .
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 .
López-Illescas, C., de Moya-Anegón, F., & Moed, H. F. (2008). Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 304–316. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001 .
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105–2125. doi: 10.1002/asi.20677 .
Mikki, S. (2009). Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for earth sciences. Scientometrics, 82(2), 321–331. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0038-6 .
Mingers, J., & Lipitakis, E. A. E. C. G. (2010). Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management. Scientometrics, 85(2), 613–625. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0270-0 .
National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and engineering indicators, chapter 5: Academic research and development. Data and terminology. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c5/c5s3.htm#sb1
Nederhof, A. J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2 .
Osca-Lluch, J., Miguel, S., González, C., Peñaranda-Ortega, M., & Quiñones-Vidal, E. (2013). Cobertura y solapamiento de Web of Science y Scopus en el análisis de la actividad científica española en psicología. Anales de Psicología. doi: 10.6018/analesps.29.3.154911 .
Santa, S., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2010). Cobertura de la ciencia de América Latina y el Caribe en Scopus vs Web of Science. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 24(52), 13–27.
van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346. doi: 10.1023/A:1010549719484 .
Wouters, P. (2006). Aux origines de la scientométrie: La naissance du Science Citation Index. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 4(164), 10–21. doi: 10.3917/arss.164.0011 .
Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control—Tracking the impact of scholarly publications in the 21st century. Report for the Surf Foundation.