The intensive and the extensive margins: not only an international issue

Portuguese Economic Journal - Tập 12 - Trang 1-34 - 2013
Marta Arespa1
1Economic Theory Department, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Tóm tắt

Empirical evidence shows that quantity (intensive margin) and variety availability (extensive margin) have effects of different magnitude on populations’ welfare. Indeed, the pattern of a market dynamics may cause changes in welfare inequality. Low income consumers benefit more from quantity than high income consumers, who are more interested in enjoying variety. These facts have been usually addressed as consequences of trade liberalization by international trade theory. However, market dynamics are also present within the borders of every country. It is important to understand what forces, unrelated with international trade, affect these dynamics. This paper explores the transmission of different real shocks into market dynamics in a new-Keynesian closed economy. Results show that the source of the shock is crucial to determine the magnitude and direction of the effects on each margin.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvarez F, Jermann UJ (2004) Using asset prices to measure the cost of business cycles. J Polit Econ 112(6):1223–1256 Auray S, Eyquem A (2011) Do changes in product variety matter for business cycles and monetary policy in open economies? Int Finance 14(3):507–539 Bergin PR (2003) Putting the new open economy macroeconomics to a test. J Int Econ 60(1):3–34 Bergin P, Corsetti G (2008) The extensive margin and monetary policy. J Monet Econ 55:1222–1237 Bilbiie F, Ghironi F, Melitz M (2007) Monetary policy and business cycles with endogenous entry and product variety. In: Acemoglu D, Rogoff K, Woodford M (eds) NBER macroeconomic annual 2007, no 22, pp 299–353 Bilbiie F, Ghironi F, Melitz M (2012) Endogenous entry, product variety and business cycles. J Polit Econ 120(2):304–345 Beaudry P, van Wincoop E (1995) The intertemporal elasticity of substitution: an exploration using US panel of state data. Economica 63:495–512 Broda C, Weinstein DE (2006) Globalization and the gains from variety. Q J Econ 121(2):541–585 Campbell J, Mankiw NG (1989) Consumption, income, and interest rates: reinterpreting the time series evidence. In: Blanchard O, Fischer S (eds) NBER macroeconomic annual. MIT Cambridge MA, pp 185–216 Cavallari L (2010) Exports and foreign direct investments in an endogenous-entry model with real and nominal uncertainty. J Macroecon 32(1):300–313 Corsetti G, Martin P, Pesenti P (2007) Productivity spillovers, terms of trade and the ‘home market effect. J Int Econ 73(1):99–127. Previously NBER WP 11165 Corsetti G, Pesenti P (2009) The simple geometry of transmission and stabilization in closed and open economy. NBER Chapters. In: NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2007. pp 65–116 Corsetti G, Pesenti P (2005) International dimensions of optimal monetary policy. J Monet Econ 52(2):281–305 Debaere P, Lee H (2004) The real-side determinants of countries’ terms of trade: a panel data analysis. University of Texas at Austin, mimeo Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3):297–308 Erceg CJ, Henderson DW, Levin AT (2000) Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts. J Monet Econ 46(2):281–313 Feenstra RC (1992) How costly is protectionism? J Econ Perspect 6(3):159–178 Funke M, Ruhwedel R (2001) Product variety and economic growth: empirical evidence for the OECD countries vol 48, no 2, p 1, IMF staff papers, Palgrave Macmillan Funke M, Ruhwedel R (2003) Trade, product variety, and welfare: a quantitative assessment for the transition economies in Central and Eastern Europe. BOFIT DP, 17/2003 Funke M, Ruhwedel R (2008) Trade, product variety, and welfare: a quantitative assessment for Mainland China. China Econ J 1:203–212 Ghironi F, Melitz M (2005) International trade and macroeconomic dynamics with heterogeneous firms. Q J Econ 120(3):865–915 de Groot HLF, Nahuis R (1998) Taste for diversity and the optimality of economic growth. Econ Lett 58:291–295 Hall RE (1988) Intertemporal substitution in consumption. J Polit Econ 96:339–357 Hummels D, Klenow PJ (2005) The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. Am Econ Rev 95(3):704–723 Kollmann R (2006) International portfolio equilibrium and the current account. CEPR DP 5512 Krugman PR (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. Am Econ Rev 70(5):950 Krugman PR (1981) Trade, accumulation, and uneven development. J Dev Econ 8(2):149–161 Krugman PR (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499 Mankiw G, Whinston MD (1986) Free entry and social inefficiency. Rand J Econ 17:48–58 Obstfeld M, Rogoff K (2000) New directions for stochastic open economy models. J Int Econ 50(1(2)):117–153 Poschke M (2009) Employment protection, firm selection, and growth. J Monet Econ 56(8):1074–1085 Romer PM (1994) New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions. J Dev Econ 43(1):5–38 Tarasov A (2009) Globalization: intensive versus extensive margin. In: Essays in income distribution and trade volumes, thesis dissertation of The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Economics