The insider view: tackling disabling practices in higher education institutions

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 80 Số 2 - Trang 273-287 - 2020
Wendy Merchant1, Stuart Read2, Stephen D’Evelyn3, Caroline Miles4, Val Williams3
1Independent Researcher, Bristol, UK
2Bath Spa University, Newton Saint Loe, UK
3University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
4West of England Centre for Inclusive Living, Bristol, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper reports on research about the experiences of disabled staff members in UK universities, drawing on eleven semi-structured interviews with disabled staff in one university, alongside a group auto ethnography conducted by the first four authors, all of whom identified as disabled academics. Disability is generally considered to be predominantly an issue for students, both in practice and in the literature. By contrast, taking a social practice approach, we focused on the barriers faced by disabled employees, both overt and hidden. We found that disability was still viewed as a medical problem, and that disabled members of staff faced considerable extra labour in organising their own supports. We were often made to feel that we were unwanted and that we were ‘misfits’ in the institution. This paper contributes to theory by showing how social practices can become exclusionary, and how interconnections between practices matter. We discuss ways in which ableism, based on the ideal of ‘individual’ excellence, creates barriers for disabled staff. In the global context of Higher Education, the increasing marketization of universities in higher income countries creates a difficult climate for the values of inclusion.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baltaru, R.-D. (2019). Universities’ pursuit of inclusion and its effects on professional staff: The case of the United Kingdom. Higher Education, 77(4), 641–656.

Berggren, U. J., Rowan, D., Bergbäck, E., & Blomberg, B. (2016). Disabled students’ experiences of higher education in Sweden, the Czech Republic, and the United States – A comparative institutional analysis. Disability & Society, 31(3), 339–356.

Berghs, M. (2015). Radicalising ‘disability’ in conflict and post-conflict situations. Disability & Society, 30(5), 743–758.

Blockmans, I. (2015). “Not wishing to be the white rhino in the crowd”: Disability-disclosure at university. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(2), 158–180.

Blue, S., & Spurling, N. (2017). Qualities of connective tissue in hospital life: How complexes of practices change. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 24–37). Oxford: Routledge.

Brewster, S., Duncan, N., Emir, M., & Clifford, A. (2017). Personal sacrifice and corporate cultures: Career progression for disabled staff in higher education. Disability & Society, 32(7), 1027–1042.

Broderick, A., & Lalvani, P. (2017). Dysconscious ableism: Toward a liberatory praxis in teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 894–905.

Brown, N., & Leigh, J. (2018). Ableism in academia: Where are the disabled and ill academics? Disability & Society, 33(6), 985–989.

Cameron, H. E. (2016). Beyond cognitive deficit: The everyday lived experience of dyslexic students at university. Disability & Society, 31(2), 223–239.

Chan, A. (2005). Policy discourses and changing practice: Diversity and the university-college. Higher Education, 50(1), 129–157.

Collins, A., Azmat, F., & Rentschler, R. (2019). “Bringing everyone on the same journey”: Revisiting inclusion in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 44(8), 1475–1487.

Corlett, S., & Williams, J. (2011). The effects of discourse and local organizing practices on disabled academics’ identities. Paper presented at the 7th International Critical Management Studies Conference, 11-13 July 2011, Naples: Italy.

Cribb, A., & Gewirtz, S. (2013). The hollowed-out university? A critical analysis of changing institutional and academic norms in UK higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 338–350.

Cunnah, W. (2015). Disabled students: Identity, inclusion and work-based placements. Disability & Society, 30(2), 213–226.

Cutajar, J., & Adjoe, C. (2016). Whose knowledge, whose voice? Power, agency and resistance in Disability Studies for the Global South. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook (pp. 503–516). London: Springer.

Department for Work and Pensions [DWP] (n.d.). Get support in work if you have a disability or health condition (Access to Work). https://www.gov.uk/access-to-work. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

Dolmage, J. T. (2017). Academic ableism: Disability and higher education. California: University of Michigan Press.

Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.

Equality Act (2010). The Stationery Office, London, UK.

Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2016). Creating living knowledge: The Connected Communities Programme, community-university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. University of Bristol: Arts and Humanities Research Council.

Findlow, S. (2008). Accountability and innovation in higher education: A disabling tension? Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 313–329.

Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. (2009). “Just be yourself!”: Towards neo-normative control in organisations? Employee Relations, 31(6), 569–583.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.

Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609.

Garland-Thomson, R. (2014). The story of my work: How I became disabled. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4254.

Getting Things Changed (2018). http://www.bristol.ac.uk/sps/gettingthingschanged/. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

Girli, A., Sarı, H. Y., Kırkım, G., & Narin, S. (2016). University students’ attitudes towards disability and their views on discrimination. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 62(2), 98–107.

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: Perceived barriers and opportunities of the universal design for learning framework. Disability & Society, 32(10), 1627–1649.

Gustavsson, A. (2004). The role of theory in disability research - springboard or strait-jacket? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 55–70.

Hancock, P., & Tyler, M. (2009). The management of everyday life. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.

Hansen, N. (2008). A delicate balance: Chronic conditions and workspace. In D. Driedger & M. Owen (Eds.), Dissonant disabilities: Women with chronic illnesses explore their lives (pp. 131–148). Ontario: Scholars’ Press Inc..

Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2018). Higher Education Staff Statistics: UK, 2016/17. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/18-01-2018/sfr248-higher-education-staff-statistics. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

Hui, A. (2017). Variation and the intersection of practices. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 52–67). Oxford: Routledge.

Inckle, K. (2018). Unreasonable adjustments: The additional unpaid labour of academics with disabilities. Disability & Society, 33(8), 1372–1376.

Lourens, H., & Swartz, L. (2016). Experiences of visually impaired students in higher education: Bodily perspectives on inclusive education. Disability & Society, 31(2), 240–251.

Martin, B. R. (2016). What’s happening to our universities? Prometheus, 34(1), 7–24.

Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682.

Mellifont, D., Smith-Merry, J., Dickinson, H., Llewellyn, G., Clifton, S., Ragen, J., Raffaele, M., & Williamson, P. (2019). The ableism elephant in the academy: A study examining academia as informed by Australian scholars with lived experience. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1602510.

Mills, S., Trehan, K., & Stewart, J. (2014). Academics in pursuit of the part-time doctorate: Pressures and support issues associated with the career development of business and management academics. Human Resource Development International, 17(4), 438–458.

Mutanga, O. (2018). Inclusion of students with disabilities in South African higher education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65(2), 229–242.

Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability & Society, 7(2), 101–114.

Raymaker, D. M. (2017). Reflections of a community-based participatory researcher from the intersection of disability advocacy, engineering, and the academy. Action Research, 15(3), 258–275.

Reason, P. (1994). Co-operative inquiry, participatory action research and action inquiry: Three approaches to participatory inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–339). London: Sage.

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

Roulstone, A., & Williams, J. (2014). Being disabled, being a manager: “glass partitions” and conditional identities in the contemporary workplace. Disability & Society, 29(1), 16–29.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Taylor & Francis.

Schatzki, T. (2017). Sayings, texts and discursive formations. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 126–140). Oxford: Routledge.

Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.

Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

Swain, J., & French, S. (2000). Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582.

Taylor, A., & Shallish, L. (2019). The logic of bio-meritocracy in the promotion of higher education equity. Disability & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1613962.

Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569–583.

Titchkosky, T. (2008). To pee or not to pee? Ordinary talk about extraordinary exclusions in a university environment. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 37–60.

Trahar, S. (Ed.). (2013). Contextualising narrative inquiry: Developing methodological approaches for local contexts. Oxford: Routledge.

Tudzi, E. P., Bugri, J. T., & Danso, A. K. (2017). Human rights of students with disabilities in Ghana: Accessibility of the university built environment. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(3), 275–294.

Wall, S. (2006). An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(2), 146–160.

Waterfield, B., Beagan, B., & Weinberg, M. (2018). Disabled academics: A case study in Canadian universities. Disability & Society, 33(3), 327–348.

Watson, M. (2017). Placing power in practice theory. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 169–182). Oxford: Routledge.

Williams, J. (2011). What can disabled academics' career experiences offer to studies of organization? Doctoral thesis, Northumbria University.

Williams, V. (2019). ‘Like us you mean?’ Sensitive disability questions and peer research encounters. In K. K. Roulston (Ed.), Interactional studies of qualitative research interviews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Williams, J., & Mavin, S. (2015). Impairment effects as a career boundary: A case study of disabled academics. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 123–141.

Williams, V., Tarleton, B., Heslop, P., Porter, S., Sass, B., Blue, S., Merchant, W., & Mason-Angelow, V. (2018). Understanding disabling barriers: a fruitful partnership between Disability Studies and social practices? Disability & Society, 33(2), 157–174.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 80 Số 2

273-287

Thông tin tác giả