The influence of neighbourhood design on travel behaviour: Empirical evidence from North East England

Transport Policy - Tập 26 - Trang 54-65 - 2013
Paulus Teguh Aditjandra1, Corinne Mulley2, John D. Nelson3
1NewRail-Centre for Railway Research, School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering, Newcastle University, Stephenson Building, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
2Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), University of Sydney Business School, Newton Campus, 144 Burren Street, C37, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
3Centre for Transport Research, College of Physical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Fraser Noble Building, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abou-Zeid, 2011, The effect of social comparisons on commute well-being, Transportation Research Part A, 45, 345 Aditjandra, 2012, Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan area, Transportation Research Part A, 46, 22 Aditjandra, 2009, The extent to which sustainable travel to work can be explained by neighbourhood design characteristics, Transportation Research Record, 2134, 114, 10.3141/2134-14 Aditjandra, 2009, Neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: a comparison of US and UK experience, Projections, 9, 28 Aditjandra, P., Mulley, C., Nelson, J., 2007. Differences of neighbourhood design perception and travel behaviour in Tyne and Wear, North East England, UK. In: Proceedings of the Regional Studies Association (RSA) Winter Conference 23 November 2007, London. ISBN no. 978-1-897721-33-9. Babbie, 2004 Badoe, 2000, Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modelling, Transportation Research Part D, 5, 235, 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00036-X Banister, 1997, Reducing the need to travel, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 437, 10.1068/b240437 Banister, 1997, Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 125, 10.1068/b240125 Barker, 2006 Boarnet, 2001 Bohte, 2009, Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: a review of theories and empirical research, Transport Reviews, 29, 325, 10.1080/01441640902808441 Boussauw, 2011, Linking expected mobility production to sustainable residential location: some evidence from Flanders, Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 936, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.12.002 Breheny, M. (Ed.), 1993. The Compact City. Built Environment 18 (4) (Special issue). Breheny, 1997, Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable?, Cities (London, England), 14, 209 Bramley, 2009, Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from British cities, Environment and Planning A, 41, 2125, 10.1068/a4184 British National Statistics, 2001. British Census 2001. Available from: 〈http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk〉. CABE (Commission for Architecture and Built Environment, UK), 2004. Design Coding: Testing its use in England. The Report Written by CABE in Partnership with ODPM and English Partnerships and Based on Research by Tibbalds Planning & Urban Design, the Bartlett School of Planning, UCL and Rob Cowan. 〈http://www.cabe.org.uk/AssetLibrary/2221.pdf〉. Cao, 2007, Do changes in neighbourhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behaviour? a structural equations modelling approach, Transportation, 34, 535, 10.1007/s11116-007-9132-x Cao, 2009, Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings, Transport Reviews, 29, 359, 10.1080/01441640802539195 Cervero, 2002, Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework, Transportation Research Part D, 7, 265, 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4 Cervero, 1997, Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design, Transportation Research Part D, 2, 199, 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6 CfIT—Commission for Integrated Transport, 2009. Land Use and Transport: Settlement Patterns and the Demand for Travel. Halcrow Group Ltd in Association with Headicar, P., Banister, D., Pharoah, T. Background Technical Report. October 2009. Available from: 〈http://cfit.independent.gov.uk/pubs/2009/sustainable/technical/pdf/pst-technical.pdf〉. Chatterjee, 1991 Curtis, 2008, Planning for sustainable accessibility: the implementation challenge, Transport Policy, 15, 104, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.003 Dempsey, 2010, Revisiting the compact city in the compact city revisited, Built Environment, 36, 5, 10.2148/benv.36.1.5 DETR–Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone: the Government's White Paper on the Future of Transport. TSO, London DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions), 2001 Dieleman, 2002, Urban form and travel behaviour: Micro-level household attributes and residential context, Urban Studies, 39, 507, 10.1080/00420980220112801 Echenique, M., Barton, H., Hargreaves, T., Mitchell, G., 2010. EPSRC SOLUTIONS Final Report. November 2010. Available from: 〈http://www.suburbansolutions.ac.uk/DocumentManager/secure0/SOLUTIONSFinalReport.pdf〉. Eddington, 2006 Ewing, 2001, Travel and the built environment, Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87, 10.3141/1780-10 Ewing, 2010, Traffic generated by mixed-use developments: six-region study using consistent built environmental measures, Journal of Urban Planning and Development Field, 2005 Handy, 1996, Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behaviour, Transportation Research Part D, 1, 151, 10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00010-7 Handy, S., 2005. Critical assessment of literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. TRB Special Report 282: Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity? Examining the Evidence. Handy, 2005, Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behaviour? Evidence from Northern California, Transportation Research Part D, 10, 427, 10.1016/j.trd.2005.05.002 Hayton, 2004, Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: a tutorial on parallel analysis, Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191, 10.1177/1094428104263675 Hickman, 2007, Looking over the horizon: transport and reduced CO2 emissions in the UK by 2030, Transport Policy, 14, 377, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.005 Hickman, 2010, Planning for sustainable travel—integrating spatial planning and transport, 33 HM Government, 2007. Planning for a Sustainable Future: White Paper. Available from: 〈http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/320546〉. Howley, 2009, Sustainability versus liveability: an investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52, 847, 10.1080/09640560903083798 1996 Kitamura, 1997, A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighbourhoods in the San Francisco bay area, Transportation, 24, 125, 10.1023/A:1017959825565 Marshall, 2005 Maat, 2009, A causal model relating urban form with daily travel distance through activity/travel decisions, Transport Planning and Technology, 32, 115, 10.1080/03081060902861285 Meurs, 2001, Spatial structure and mobility, Transportation Research Part D, 6, 429, 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00007-4 Naess, 1993, Transportation energy in Swedish towns and regions, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 10, 187, 10.1080/02815739308730340 Naess, 2006 Naess, 2009, Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land-use-travel studies, Transport Reviews, 29, 293, 10.1080/01441640802710812 Naess, 2004, Urban structure matters, even in a small town, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, 35, 10.1080/0964056042000189790 Neuman, 2005, The compact city fallacy, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, 11, 10.1177/0739456X04270466 O'Connor, 2000, SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396, 10.3758/BF03200807 Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM), 2004. The English Indices of Deprivation 2004: Summary (revised). Available from: 〈http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/131206.pdf〉. Scheiner, 2007, Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?, Transportation, 34, 487, 10.1007/s11116-007-9112-1 Shaheen, 2007, Reducing greenhouse emissions and fuel consumption—sustainable approaches for surface transportation, IATSS Research, 31, 6, 10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60179-5 Stead, 2001, Relationships between land use, socio-economic factors, and travel patterns, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 499, 10.1068/b2677 Stern, 2006 Schwanen, 2005, What if you live in the wrong neighbourhood? The impact of residential neighbourhood type dissonance on distance travelled, Transportation Research Part D, 10, 127, 10.1016/j.trd.2004.11.002 van Acker, 2010, When transport geography meets social psychology: toward a conceptual model of travel behaviour, Transport Reviews, 30, 219, 10.1080/01441640902943453 WCED–World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. Our Common Future The Brundtland Report. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Widaman, 1993, Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters?, Multivaruate Behavioural Research, 28, 263, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1