The influence of context-reinforcer associations on instrumental performance
Tóm tắt
In each of two experiments, rats were trained to press the lever in a Skinner box, food reinforcement being available on a variable-interval 60-sec schedule (VI 60). There followed an “exposure phase” for which the levers were removed from the boxes, and then a final test with the levers replaced to assess the effects of the intervening treatment on instrumental responding. Experiment 1 showed that simple exposure to the box reduced the vigor of instrumental performance in comparison with a condition in which food was made available during the exposure phase. Animals which received no exposure treatment also showed a relatively high rate of response. Experiment 2 demonstrated that an exposure treatment in which the occurrence of food is signaled by a light stimulus also leads to a decline in instrumental responding. These results are held to support the notion that associations between the context and the reinforcer serve to energize appetitive instrumental behavior.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baum, M., &Gleitman, H. “Conditioned anticipation” with an extinction baseline: The need for a disinhibition control group.Psychonomk Science, 1967,8, 95–96.
Bolles, R. C., &Grossen, N. E. The noncontingent manipulation of incentive motivation. In J. H. Reynierse (Ed.),Current issues in animal learning. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.
Brimer, C. J. Disinhibition of an operant response.Learning and Motivation, 1970,1, 346–371.
Estes, W. K. Discriminative conditioning. I. A discriminative property of conditioned anticipation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943,32, 150–155.
Hall, G., Mackintosh, N. J., Goodall, G., &Dal Martello, M. Loss of control by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 145–158.
Hull, C. L. A behavior system. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1952.
Karpicke, J. Directed approach responses and positive conditioned suppression in the rat.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 216–224.
Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Logan, F. A. Incentive. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1960.
Mackintosh, N. J. The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press, 1974.
Rescorla, R. A., &Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 151–182.
Spence, K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1956.
Tomie, A. Interference with autoshaping by prior context conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 323–334.
Trapold, M. A., &Overmier, J. B. The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research. New York: Appleton, 1972.
Wagner, A. R. Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press, 1969.
Wagner, A. R., Logan, F. A., HaBerlandt, K., &Price, T. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,76, 171–180.
Welker, R. L., &McAuley, K. Reductions in resistance to extinction and spontaneous recovery as a function of changes in transportational and contextual stimuli.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 451–457.
Welker, R. L., Tomie, A., Davitt, G. A., &Thomas, D. R. Contextual stimulus control over operant responding in pigeons.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974,86, 549–562.