The inconsistency of h-index: A mathematical analysis

Abramo, 2014, How do you define and measure research productivity?, Scientometrics, 101, 1129, 10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8 Aitchison, 1963 Aksnes, 2019, Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories, SAGE Open, 1 Albarrán, 2017, The Herrero-Villar approach to citation impact, Journal of Informetrics, 11, 625, 10.1016/j.joi.2017.04.008 Allen, 2009, Looking for landmarks: The role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs, PloS One, 4, e5910, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005910 Bertoli-Barsotti, 2017, A theoretical model of the relationship between the h-index and other simple citation indicators, Scientometrics, 111, 1415, 10.1007/s11192-017-2351-9 Bornmann, 2013, What is societal impact of reserach and how can it be assessed? A literature survey, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 64, 217, 10.1002/asi.22803 Bornmann, 2014, h-index reserach in scientometrics: A summary, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 749, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.004 Bornmann, 2017, Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orintation towards societal impact?, Scientometrics, 110, 937, 10.1007/s11192-016-2200-2 Bornmann, 2018, Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: Use normalized citations counts and compare “like with like”!, Scientometrics, 115, 1119, 10.1007/s11192-018-2682-1 Bornmann, 2019, Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in reserach evaluation, Scientometrics, 120, 419, 10.1007/s11192-019-03018-x Bornmann, 2011, Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 228, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.009 Bornmann, 2009, Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 60, 1286, 10.1002/asi.21016 Bornmann, 2011, A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 346, 10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006 Brito, 2018, Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 12, 315, 10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.011 De Bellis, 2009 Egghe, 2006, An informetric model for the Hirsch-index, Scientometrics, 69, 121, 10.1007/s11192-006-0143-8 Evans, 2012, Universality of performance indicators based on citation and reference counts, Scientometrics, 93, 473, 10.1007/s11192-012-0694-9 Gautschi, 1965, Error function and Fresnel integrals Glänzel, 2006, On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publications activity and citation impact, Scientometrics, 67, 315, 10.1007/s11192-006-0102-4 Harnad, 2009, Open access scientometrics and the UK research assessment exercise, Scientometrics, 79, 147, 10.1007/s11192-009-0409-z Hirsch, 2005, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific reserach output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 102, 16569, 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 Ke, 2015, Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 112, 7426, 10.1073/pnas.1424329112 Leydesdorff, 2011, Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 1370, 10.1002/asi.21534 MacRoberts, 2018, The mismeasure of science: Citation analysis, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69, 474, 10.1002/asi.23970 Malesios, 2015, Some variations on the standard theretical models for the h-index: A comparative analysis, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 2384, 10.1002/asi.23410 Molinari, 2008, Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index, Scientometrics, 75, 339, 10.1007/s11192-007-1872-z Montazerian, 2019, A new parameter for (normalized) evaluation of H-index: Countries as a case study, Scientometrics, 118, 1065, 10.1007/s11192-018-2996-z Newman, 2005, Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law, Conterporary Physiscs, 46, 323 Press, 2013, What’s so special about science (and how much should we spend on it?), Science, 342, 817, 10.1126/science.342.6160.817 Pride, 2018, Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large scale analysis, Vol. 11057 Radicchi, 2008, Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 17268, 10.1073/pnas.0806977105 Redner, 2005, Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review, Physics Today, 58, 49, 10.1063/1.1996475 REF2014, 2011 Rodríguez-Navarro, 2011, A simple index for the high-citation tail of citation distribution to quantify research performance in countries and institutions, PloS One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0020510 Rodríguez-Navarro, 2016, Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the United States and Europe in terms of highly cited papers and Noble Prizes, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 731, 10.1002/asi.23412 Rodríguez-Navarro, 2018, Double rank analysis for research assessment, Journal of Informetrics, 12, 31, 10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.004 Rodríguez-Navarro, 2020, Like-for-like bibliometric substitutes for peer review: Advantages and limits of indicators calculated from the ep index, Research Evaluation, 29, 215, 10.1093/reseval/rvaa002 Ruiz-Castillo, 2012, The evaluation of citation distribution, SERIEs, 3, 291, 10.1007/s13209-011-0074-3 Schreiber, 2013, A case study of the arbitrariness of the h-index and the highly-cited publication indicator, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 379, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.006 Stringer, 2010, Statistical validation of a global model for the distribution of the ultimate number of citations accrued by papers published in a scientific journal, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 61, 1377, 10.1002/asi.21335 Thelwall, 2016, Citation count distributions for large monodisciplinary journals, Journal of Informetrics, 10, 863, 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.006 Thelwall, 2016, Not dead, just resting: The practical value of per publication citation indicators, Journal of Informetrics, 10, 667, 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.009 Thelwall, 2016, The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modelling approach, Journal of Informetrics, 10, 110, 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.001 Thelwall, 2014, Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 824, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.001 Thelwall, 2014, Regression for citation data: An evaluation of different methods, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 963, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.011 Tijssen, 2002, Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?, Scientometrics, 54, 381, 10.1023/A:1016082432660 Traag, 2019, Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF, Palgrave Communications, 5, 29, 10.1057/s41599-019-0233-x van Raan, 2004, Sleeping beaties in science, Scientometrics, 59, 467, 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018543.82441.f1 van Raan, 2005, Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods, Scientometrics, 62, 133, 10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 van Raan, 2006, Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups, Scientometrics, 67, 491, 10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.10 Viiu, 2018, The lognormal distribution explains the remarkable pattern documented by characteristic scores and scales in scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, 12, 401, 10.1016/j.joi.2018.02.002 Waltman, 2012, The inconsistency of the h-index, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 406, 10.1002/asi.21678 Wang, 2017, Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators, Research Policy, 46, 1416, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006 Wilsdon, 2015