The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards

Canadian Journal of Zoology - Tập 79 Số 4 - Trang 662-670 - 2001
Anthony Herrel, Raoul Van Damme, Bieke Vanhooydonck, Frits De Vree

Tóm tắt

One of the performance features that is generally considered crucial to increasing the potential prey spectrum of lizards is bite capacity. In this study we tested whether bite forces may serve as a basis for diet selection in two syntopically occurring lacertid lizards. We did so by measuring bite forces in vivo for a large sample of lizards of the species Podarcis muralis and Lacerta vivipara. To assess the ecological relevance of the bite forces, we tested the hardness of a number of natural prey items of both species. The results of our study support the predictions of biomechanical models of biting in lizards and indicate that both larger animals and larger headed ones bite harder. Surprisingly, head shape is an excellent predictor of bite performance in the species studied. Moreover, it is demonstrated that bite capacity is a potentially important ecological variable that could be used as a factor in explaining patterns of food-resource use, ontogenetic dietary shifts, and sexual dimorphism in diet.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrews C., 1997, Physiol. Zool., 70, 193, 10.1086/639576

Angelici F.M., 1997, Ital. J. Zool., 64, 267, 10.1080/11250009709356207

Arnold E.N., 1987, J. Zool. Ser. B, 1, 739, 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1987.tb00753.x

Arnold E.N., 1989, Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Zool., 55, 209

Arnold S.J., 1983, Am. Zool., 23, 347, 10.1093/icb/23.2.347

Avery R.A., 1962, Br. J. Herpetol., 3, 36

Bauwens D., 1995, Evolution, 49, 848

Castilla A.M., 1991, J. Herpetol., 25, 30, 10.2307/1564791

Cummins K.W., 1971, Mitt. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 18, 1

Diaz J.A., 1995, Herpetol. J., 5, 245

Herrel A., 1996, Neth. J. Zool., 46, 253

Herrel A., 1998, J. Zool. (Lond.), 244, 135, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00015.x

Herrel A., 1998, Neth. J. Zool., 48, 1

Herrel A., 1999, Funct. Ecol., 13, 289, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00305.x

Herrel A., 1999, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 184, 501, 10.1007/s003590050350

Heulin B., 1986, Acta Oecol., 7, 135

Itämies J., 1971, Aquilo Ser. Zool., 11, 37

Koponen S., 1972, Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 9, 191

McArthur R.H., 1966, Am. Nat., 100, 603, 10.1086/282454

Moreno E., 1993, Ecology, 74, 2037, 10.2307/1940849

Mou Y.-P., 1987, France. Rev. Ecol. Terre Vie, 42, 81

Mou Y.-P., 1986, Amphib.-Reptilia, 7, 171, 10.1163/156853886X00389

Nouira S., 1983, Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr., 108, 477

Pérez-Mellado V., 1993, Bonn. Zool. Beitr., 44, 193

Pilorge T., 1982, Amphib.-Reptilia, 3, 27, 10.1163/156853882X00130

Pollo C.J., 1988, Lacertidae. Ecol. Mediterr., 14, 131, 10.3406/ecmed.1988.1225

Pollo C.J., 1991, Acta Oecol., 12, 655

Pough F.H., 1985, Ecology, 66, 1525, 10.2307/1938015

Richard J., 1993, Atti Mus. Civ. Stor. Nat. Trieste, 45, 151

Schoener T.W., 1971, Rev. Ecol. Syst., 2, 369, 10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002101

Sokol O.M., 1967, Evolution, 21, 192, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb00143.x

Sorci G., 1990, Sicilia. Nat. Sicil. Ser. IV, XIV(Suppl.), 83

Strijbosch J.J., 1980, Amphib.-Reptilia, 1, 161, 10.1163/156853880X00150

Strijbosch J.J., 1980, Deel 2 : Biotoop en Biotoopgebruik. Natuurhist. Maandbl., 60, 240

Van Damme R., 1998, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 63, 409, 10.1006/bijl.1997.0202