The implementation and effects of Great Britain's National Lottery

Abt, V. & McGurrin, M. (1992). Commercial gambling and values in American society: the social construction of risk.Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 413?420.

Brooks, R. & Phillips, M. (1995). Poor losing most on the Lottery, new figures show.The Observer 29 October 1995. London.

Clotfelter, C. & Cook, P. (1989).Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Customs & Excise (1995).Annual Report of the Department of Customs and Excise year ending 31 March 1995. London: H.M.S.O. Cm 2980.

DeBoer, L. (1990). Jackpot size and Lotto sales: Evidence from Ohio 1986?87.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 345?354.

Department of National Heritage (1993). Directions to the Director General of the National Lottery under section 11 of the National Lottery etc Act 1993 (16 December 1993).

Douglas, A. (1995).British Charitable Gambling. London: Athlone Press.

Fisher, S. (1993). Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescents.Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 277?387.

FitzHerbert, L. (1995).Winners and Losers: the Impact of the National Lottery. A report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, July 1995.

Gaming Board (1989).Report of the Gaming Board for Great Britain 1988/89. London; H.M.S.O. HC 461.

Gaming Board (1994).Report of the Gaming Board for Great Britain 1993/94. London; H.M.S.O. HC 465.

Gaming Board (1995).Report of the Gaming Board for Great Britain 1994/95. London; H.M.S.O. HC 587.

Hand, I. (1992). Gambling in Europe.Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 3?9.

Home Office (1992).A National Lottery Rating Money for Good Causes. London; H.M.S.O. Cm.1861.

Home Office (1996).Casinos and Bingo Clubs: A Consultation Paper. London: Home Office.

House of Commons (1808).Second Report on Lotteries. London; HC 323.

House of Commons (1993). Official Report, Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 217.

House of Commons (1995). Official Report, Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 264.

House of Lords (1993). Official Report, Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 546.

Hraba J., Mok, W. & Huff, D. (1990). Lottery play and problem gambling.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 355?377.

Johnson, J. (1995).Home Office Policy on Gambling. Society for the Study of Gambling Newsletter No. 26 (July 1995) 3?6. London.

Kaplan, H. (1990a). Lottery mania: an Editor's view.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 289?296.

Kaplan, H. (1990b). The effect of state lotteries on the pari mutuel industry.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 331?344.

Kent-Lemon, N. (1995). Deregulation of the casino industry. Society for the Study of Gambling Newsletter No. 26 (July 1995) 12?16. London.

LeGrand, J. (1995). The Observer, 29 October 1995.

Livernois, J. (1987). The redistributive effects of lotteries: evidence from Canada.Public Finance Quarterly, 15, 339?351.

Lorenz, V. (1990). State lotteries and compulsive gambling.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 383?396.

McGowan, R. (1994).State Lotteries and Legalized Gambling. London: Quorum Books.

Miers, D. (1984). The regulation of commercial gaming.Journal of Law and Society, 11, 33?66.

Miers, D. (1996a). Objectives and systems in the regulation of commercial gambling. InGambling Cultures (ed J. McMillen) Routledge, in press.

Miers, D. (1996b). Regulating Great Britain's National Lottery. InPublic Policies, the Social Sciences and Gambling (eds W Eadington and J Cornelius), University of Nevada, in press.

Mikesell, J. (1990). Lotteries in the state fiscal system.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 313?330.

Mobilia, P. (1992). A little bit more evidence of lottery regressivity: the Kansas state lottery.Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 361?369.

National Heritage Committee (1993a).Third report: National Lottery etc Bill; House of Commons session 1992?93. London; H.M.S.O. HC. 389.

National Heritage Committee (1993b).National Lottery etc Bill; Minutes of Evidence. House of Commons session 1992?93. London; H.M.S.O. HC. 389-i.

National Heritage Committee (1995).The National Lottery. House of Commons, HC 131 (26 January 1995).

National Lottery Regulations (1994). SI 1994 No. 189.

OFLOT (1993).Invitation to Apply. London.

OFLOT (1994a).Licence to run the National Lottery under section 5 of the National Lottery etc Act 1993. 29 July 1994.

OFLOT (1994b).Licence under section 6 of the National Lottery etc Art 1993. (8 November 1994).

OFLOT (1994c).Director General of the National Lottery, Annual Report 1993?94. London: H.M.S.O. HC 672.

OFLOT (1994d). The National Lottery: Advertising Code of Practice.

OFLOT (1994e). The National Lottery: the Player Code of Practice.

OFLOT (1995a).The Anonymity Review. May 1995.

OFLOT (1995b).Director General of the National Lottery, Annual Report 1994?95. London: H.M.S.O. HC 755.

OFLOT (1996).Social Research Programme. February 1996.

Royal Commission (1978).Report of the Royal Commission on Gambling (chm Lord Rothschild). London; H.M.S.O. Cmnd 7200.

Smith, G. (1992). Sucker bet or sure thing: a critical analysis of sports lotteries.Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 331?349.

Thompson, W. & Dombrink, J. (1989). A politically acceptable model of casino gaming for American jurisdictions. InGambling in Canada (eds. C. Campbell and J. Lowman) 337?370. British Columbia; School of Criminology, Simon Fraser University.

Wilkinson, H. (1995). Running a lottery syndicate.New Law Journal, 145, 217?218 (17 February 1995).