The impact of orthodontic-surgical treatment on facial expressions—a four-dimensional clinical trial

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 27 - Trang 5841-5851 - 2023
Anja Quast1, Monika Sadlonova2,3,4,5, Thomas Asendorf6, Carlotta Derad6, Jérémy Mouchoux1, Julia Horn1, Henning Schliephake7, Philipp Kauffmann7, Philipp Meyer-Marcotty1
1Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
2Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
3Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
4Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Goettingen Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
5Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Goettingen Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
6Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
7Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

Tóm tắt

The objective of this clinical trial was to compare facial expressions (magnitude, shape change, time, and symmetry) before (T0) and after (T1) orthognathic surgery by implementing a novel method of four-dimensional (4D) motion capture analysis, known as videostereophotogrammetry, in orthodontics. This prospective, single-centre, single-arm trial included a total of 26 adult patients (mean age 28.4 years; skeletal class II: n = 13, skeletal class III: n = 13) with indication for orthodontic-surgical treatment. Two reproducible facial expressions (maximum smile, lip purse) were captured at T0 and T1 by videostereophotogrammetry as 4D face scan. The magnitude, shape change, symmetry, and time of the facial movements were analysed. The motion changes were analysed in dependence of skeletal class and surgical movements. 4D motion capture analysis was feasible in all cases. The magnitude of the expression maximum smile increased from 15.24 to 17.27 mm (p = 0.002), while that of the expression lip purse decreased from 9.34 to 8.31 mm (p = 0.01). Shape change, symmetry, and time of the facial movements did not differ significantly pre- and postsurgical. The changes in facial movements following orthodontic-surgical treatment were observed independently of skeletal class and surgical movements. Orthodontic-surgical treatment not only affects static soft tissue but also soft tissue dynamics while smiling or lip pursing. To achieve comprehensive orthodontic treatment plans, the integration of facial dynamics via videostereophotogrammetry provides a promising approach in diagnostics. DRKS00017206.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ekman P (1993) Facial expression and emotion. Am Psychol 48:384–392 Mehrabian A, Ferris SR (1967) Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. J Consult Psychol 31:248–252 Ekman P (2009) Darwin’s contributions to our understanding of emotional expressions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364:3449–3451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0189 Weeden JC, Trotman CA, Faraway JJ (2001) Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influence of sex and facial shape. Angle Orthod 71:132–140. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071%3c0132:TDAOFM%3e2.0.CO;2 Holberg C, Maier C, Steinhauser S et al (2006) Inter-individual variability of the facial morphology during conscious smiling. J Orofac Orthop 67:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-006-0518-8 Nooreyazdan M, Trotman C-A, Faraway JJ (2004) Modeling facial movement: II. A dynamic analysis of differences caused by orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1380–1386 Trotman C-A, Faraway JJ (2004) Modeling facial movement: I. A dynamic analysis of differences based on skeletal characteristics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:1372–1379 Nafziger YJ (1994) A study of patient facial expressivity in relation to orthodontic/surgical treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70041-9 Hallac RR, Feng J, Kane AA et al (2017) Dynamic facial asymmetry in patients with repaired cleft lip using 4D imaging (video stereophotogrammetry). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.005 Zhao C, Hallac RR, Seaward JR (2021) Analysis of facial movement in repaired unilateral cleft lip using three-dimensional motion capture. J Craniofac Surg 32:2074–2077. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007636 Ho C-T, Lin H-H, Liou EJW et al (2017) Three-dimensional surgical simulation improves the planning for correction of facial prognathism and asymmetry: a qualitative and quantitative study. Sci Rep 7:512. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40423 Elshebiny T, Morcos S, Mohammad A et al (2018) Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction in orthognathic cases using dolphin three-dimensional software. J Craniofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005037 Resnick CM, Dang RR, Glick SJ et al (2017) Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction for Le Fort I osteotomy using Dolphin 3D software: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.016 Modabber A, Baron T, Peters F et al (2022) Comparison of soft tissue simulations between two planning software programs for orthognathic surgery. Sci Rep 12:2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08991-7 Shujaat S, Khambay BS, Ju X et al (2014) The clinical application of three-dimensional motion capture (4D): a novel approach to quantify the dynamics of facial animations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:907–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.01.010 Ju X, O’Leary E, Peng M et al (2016) Evaluation of the reproducibility of nonverbal facial expressions using a 3D motion capture system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 53:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-090r Al-Hiyali A, Ayoub A, Ju X et al (2015) The impact of orthognathic surgery on facial expressions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:2380–2390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.05.008 Gattani S, Ju X, Gillgrass T et al (2020) An innovative assessment of the dynamics of facial movements in surgically managed unilateral cleft lip and palate using 4D imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 57:1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620924871 Ireland AJ, Cunningham SJ, Petrie A et al (2014) An index of orthognathic functional treatment need (IOFTN). J Orthod 41:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000100 Quast A, Santander P, Kahlmeier T et al (2021) Predictability of maxillary positioning: a 3D comparison of virtual and conventional orthognathic surgery planning. Head Face Med 17:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00279-x Luhr HG (1989) The significance of condylar position using rigid fixation in orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 16:147–156 Schwestka R, Engelke D, Kubein-Meesenburg D (1990) Condylar position control during maxillary surgery: the condylar positioning appliance and three-dimensional double splint method. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:161–165 Quast A, Santander P, Trautmann J et al (2020) A new approach in three dimensions to define pre- and intraoperative condyle–fossa relationships in orthognathic surgery – is there an effect of general anaesthesia on condylar position? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1303–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.011 Bell WH (1975) Le Forte I osteotomy for correction of maxillary deformities. J Oral Surg 33:412–426 Epker BN, Wylie GA (1986) Control of the condylar-proximal mandibular segments after sagittal split osteotomies to advance the mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:613–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90251-3 Hunsuck EE (1968) A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 26:250–253 Trauner R, Obwegeser H (1957) The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80063-2 Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE et al (2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 17:261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 Lenth R (2022) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.7.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Accessed 20 Mar 2023 R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 20 Mar 2023 Johnston P, Mayes A, Hughes M et al (2013) Brain networks subserving the evaluation of static and dynamic facial expressions. Cortex 49:2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.002 Verze L, Bianchi FA, Dell’Acqua A et al (2011) Facial mobility after bimaxillary surgery in class III patients: a three-dimensional study. J Craniofac Surg 22:2304–2307. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318232a7f0 Johns FR, Johnson PC, Buckley MJ et al (1997) Changes in facial movement after maxillary osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1044–8 (discussion 1048-9) Paletz JL, Manktelow RT, Chaban R (1994) The shape of a normal smile: implications for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:784–9 (discussion 790-1) Ekman P (1978) Facial action coding system. Consulting Psychologists Press Inc, Palo Alto, Calif Gross MM, Trotman CA, Moffatt KS (1996) A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion. Angle Orthod 66:189–194. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066%3c0189:ACOTDA%3e2.3.CO;2 Popat H, Richmond S, Benedikt L et al (2009) Quantitative analysis of facial movement—a review of three-dimensional imaging techniques. Comput Med Imaging Graph 33:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.03.003 Siena FL, Byrom B, Watts P et al (2018) Utilising the Intel RealSense camera for measuring health outcomes in clinical research. J Med Syst 42:53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0905-x ten Harkel TC, Speksnijder CM, van der Heijden F et al (2017) Depth accuracy of the RealSense F200: low-cost 4D facial imaging. Sci Rep 7:16263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16608-7 Avidan S, Brostow G, Cissé M et al (eds) (2022) Computer Vision – ECCV 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022. In: Proceedings, Part XVI (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13676, Band 13676) Paperback Jack RE, Garrod OGB, Yu H et al (2012) Facial expressions of emotion are not culturally universal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7241–7244. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200155109 Hess U, Blairy S, Kleck RE (1997) The intensity of emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. J Nonverbal Behav 21:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024952730333 Desai R, Blacutt M, Youdan G et al (2022) Postural control and gait measures derived from wearable inertial measurement unit devices in Huntington’s disease: recommendations for clinical outcomes. Clin Biomech 96:105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105658 Bois A, Tervil B, Moreau A et al (2022) A topological data analysis-based method for gait signals with an application to the study of multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 17:e0268475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268475 Muftuoglu O, Akturk ES, Eren H et al (2023) Long-term evaluation of masseter muscle activity, dimensions, and elasticity after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Clin Oral Investig. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05004-3 Lee D-H, Yu H-S (2012) Masseter muscle changes following orthognathic surgery: a long-term three-dimensional computed tomography follow-up. Angle Orthod 82:792–798. https://doi.org/10.2319/111911-717.1 Hsu SS-P, Gateno J, Bell RB et al (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:128–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027 Proffit WR, Phillips C, Dann C (1990) Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:153–160 Proffit WR, White RP (1990) Who needs surgical-orthodontic treatment? Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5:81–89 Espeland L, Hogevold HE, Stenvik A (2007) A 3-year patient-centred follow-up of 516 consecutively treated orthognathic surgery patients. Eur J Orthod 30:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm081 Yamamoto S, Miyachi H, Fujii H et al (2016) Intuitive facial imaging method for evaluation of postoperative swelling: a combination of 3-dimensional computed tomography and laser surface scanning in orthognathic Surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74:2506.e1-2506.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.039 Semper-Hogg W, Fuessinger MA, Dirlewanger TW et al (2017) The influence of dexamethasone on postoperative swelling and neurosensory disturbances after orthognathic surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Head Face Med 13:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-017-0153-1 Lee RJH, Perera A, Naoum S et al (2021) Treatment time for surgical-orthodontic cases: a private versus public setting comparison. Australas Orthod J 37:31–36. https://doi.org/10.21307/aoj-2021-003 Dowling PA, Espeland L, Krogstad O et al (1999) Duration of orthodontic treatment involving orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 14:146–152 van den Braber W, van der Bilt A, van der Glas H et al (2006) The influence of mandibular advancement surgery on oral function in retrognathic patients: a 5-year follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1237–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.019 Magalhães IB, Pereira LJ, Marques LS et al (2010) The influence of malocclusion on masticatory performance. Angle Orthod 80:981–987. https://doi.org/10.2319/011910-33.1