The impact of information-based interventions on conservation behavior: A meta-analysis

Abrahamse, 2005, A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, J. Environ. Psychol., 25, 273, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002 Alinaghi, 2018, Meta‐analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT‐PET‐PEESE procedure work?, Res. Synth. Methods, 9, 285, 10.1002/jrsm.1298 Allcott, 2011, Social norms and energy conservation, J. Public Econ., 95, 1082, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003 Allcott, 2015, Site selection bias in program evaluation, Q. J. Econ., 130, 1117, 10.1093/qje/qjv015 Allcott, 2012 Andrews, 2019, Identification of and correction for publication bias, Am. Econ. Rev., 109, 2766, 10.1257/aer.20180310 Ayres, 2013, Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage, J. Law Econ. Organ., 29, 992, 10.1093/jleo/ews020 Benartzi, 2017, Should governments invest more in nudging?, Psychol. Sci., 28, 1041, 10.1177/0956797617702501 Benzoni, 2016, A review of intervention studies aimed at domestic water conservation, 427 Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 Brent, 2015, Social comparisons, household water use, and participation in utility conservation programs: evidence from three randomized trials, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2, 597 Burgess, 2008, Re-materialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems, Energy Policy, 36, 4454, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.039 Delmas, 2013, Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: a meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012, Energy Policy, 61, 729, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109 Djebbari, 2008, Heterogeneous impacts in PROGRESA, J. Econom., 145, 64, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.012 Doucouliagos, 2009, Publication selection bias in minimum‐wage research? A meta‐regression analysis, Br. J. Ind. Relat., 47, 406, 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00723.x Farhar, 1989 Faruqui, 2010, The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—a survey of the experimental evidence, Energy, 35, 1598, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.042 Ferraro, 2013, Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: evidence from a large-scale field experiment, Resour. Energy Econ., 35, 356, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.04.001 Ferraro, 2013, Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment, Rev. Econ. Stat., 95, 64, 10.1162/REST_a_00344 Heckman, 1997, Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts, Rev. Econ. Stud., 64, 487, 10.2307/2971729 Hummel, 2019, How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies, J. Behav. Exp. Econ., 80, 47, 10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005 Imai, 2013, Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation, Ann. Appl. Stat., 7, 443, 10.1214/12-AOAS593 Karlin, 2015 Lindhjem, 2008, How reliable are meta-analyses for international benefit transfers?, Ecol. Econ., 66, 425, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.005 List, 2001, What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?, Environ. Resour. Econ., 20, 241, 10.1023/A:1012791822804 Manski, 2004, Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations, Econometrica, 72, 1221, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00530.x Mullaly, 1998, Home energy use behaviour: a necessary component of successful local government home energy conservation (LGHEC) programs, Energy Policy, 26, 1041, 10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00046-9 Nelson, 2014, Estimating the price elasticity of beer: meta-analysis of data with heterogeneity, dependence, and publication bias, J. Health Econ., 33, 180, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.11.009 Nemati, 2016 Olmstead, 2010, The economics of managing scarce water resources, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 4, 179, 10.1093/reep/req004 Penn, 2018, Understanding hypothetical bias: an enhanced meta-analysis, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 10.1093/ajae/aay021 Penn, 2019, Cheap talk efficacy under potential and actual Hypothetical Bias: a meta-analysis, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 96, 22, 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.02.005 Shrestha, 2001, Testing a meta-analysis model for benefit transfer in international outdoor recreation, Ecol. Econ., 39, 67, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00193-8 Simonsohn, 2014, p-curve and effect size: correcting for publication bias using only significant results, Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 9, 666, 10.1177/1745691614553988 Stanley, 2012 Stanley, 2014, Meta‐regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias, Res. Synth. Methods, 5, 60, 10.1002/jrsm.1095 Stanley, 2009, Are recreation values systematically underestimated? Reducing publication selection bias for benefit transfer, Bull. Econ. Meta-Anal. Stanley, 2013, Meta‐analysis of economics research reporting guidelines, J. Econ. Surv., 27, 390, 10.1111/joes.12008 Steg, 2008, Promoting household energy conservation, Energy Policy, 36, 4449, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027 Van Lissa, 2017 Vining, 2002, Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behaviour, Urbana, 51, 541 Wichman, 2017, A cautionary tale on using panel data estimators to measure program impacts, Econ. Lett., 151, 82, 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.11.029 Yoeli, 2013, Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 10424, 10.1073/pnas.1301210110