The impact of cost allocation errors on price and product-mix decisions

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting - Tập 51 - Trang 497-527 - 2017
C. Homburg1, Julia Nasev1, Philipp Plank1
1Department of Accounting, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Tóm tắt

We use simulations to examine the impact of cost allocation errors on pricing and product-mix decisions. We compare the imperfect cost allocation of cost systems based on heuristics to the ideal cost allocation of a benchmark model. First, we find that more complex cost systems are associated with substantially lower profit errors. Second, we decompose the profit error and find that production quantity errors are larger than product portfolio errors indicating that reducing product portfolio errors is less critical in designing cost systems. We also document that overproduction errors are larger than underproduction errors and errors from keeping unprofitable products are larger than errors from dropping profitable products suggesting that cost systems tend to underestimate full costs. Third, we find that profit errors increase for more complex cost systems as resource sharing levels rise, which is an interesting counter intuitive result.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed MN, Scapens RW (2000) Cost allocation in Britain: towards an institutional analysis. Eur Acc Rev 9:159–204 Anand V, Balakrishnan R, Labro E (2013) On the profit performance of tidy cost systems: a numerical experiment. Working Paper, Emory University Balachandran BV, Balakrishnan R, Sivaramakrishnan K (1997) On the efficiency of cost-based decision rules for capacity planning. Acc Rev 72:599–619 Balakrishnan R, Sivaramakrishnan K (2002) A critical overview of the use of full-cost data for planning and pricing. J Manag Acc Res 14:3–31 Balakrishnan R, Hansen S, Labro E (2011) Evaluating heuristics used when designing product costing systems. Manag Sci 57:520–541 Banker R, Hansen S (2002) The adequacy of full-cost-based pricing heuristics. J Manag Acc Res 14:33–58 Banker RD, Hughes JS (1994) Product costing and pricing. Acc Rev 69:479–494 Bjornenak T, Mitchell F (2002) The development of activity-based costing journal literature 1987–2000. Eur Acc Rev 11:481–508 Bordley RF (1993) Estimating Automotive Elasticities from Segment Elasticities and First Choice/Second Choice Data. Rev Econ Stat 75:455–462 Brierley J, Cowton J, Drury C (2001) Research into product costing practice: a European perspective. Eur Acc Rev 10:215–256 Bromwich M, Hong C (1999) Activity-based costing systems and incremental costs. Manag Acc Res 10:39–60 Charles SL, Hansen DR (2008) An evaluation of activity-based costing and functional-based costing: a game-theoretic approach. Int J Prod Econ 113:282–296 Cooper R, Kaplan RS (1988) How cost accounting distorts product costs. Acc Manag 69:20–27 Datar S, Gupta M (1994) Aggregation, specification and measurement errors in product costing. Acc Rev 69:567–591 Dearman DT, Shields MD (2001) Cost knowledge and cost-based judgment performance. J Manag Acc Res 13:1–18 Feldman D, Trzcinka C, Winer RS (2015) Pricing under noisy signaling. Rev Quant Financ Acc 45:435–454 Hansen S, Magee RP (1993) Capacity cost and capacity allocation. Contemp Acc Res 9:635–660 Homburg C (2001a) A note on optimal cost driver selection in ABC. Manag Acc Res 12:197–205 Homburg C (2001b) Using data envelopment analysis to benchmark activities. Int J Prod Econ 73:51–58 Homburg C (2004) Improving activity-based costing heuristics by higher-level cost drivers. Eur J Oper Res 157:332–343 Homburg C (2005) Using relative profits as an alternative to activity-based costing. Int J Prod Econ 95:387–397 Hwang Y, Evans III JH, Hegde VG (1993) Product cost bias and selection of an allocation base. J Manag Account Res 5:213–242 Innes J, Mitchel F, Sinclair D (2000) Activity-based costing in the U.K’.s larget companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Manag Acc Res 11:349–362 Kee R, Schmidt C (2000) A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions. Int J Prod Econ 63:1–17 Kennedy T, Affleck-Graves J (2001) The impact of activity-based costing techniques on firm performance. J Manag Acc Res 13:19–45 Labro E, Vanhoucke M (2007) A simulation analysis of interactions among errors in costing systems. Acc Rev 82:939–962 Labro E, Vanhoucke M (2008) Diversity in resource consumption patterns and robustness of cost systems to errors. Manag Sci 54:1715–1730 Leitch RA, Chen Y (1999) Simulation of controlled financial statements. Rev Quant Financ Acc 13:189–207 Pfaff D (1994) On the allocation of overhead costs. Eur Acc Rev 1:49–70 Schilling M (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad Manag Rev 25:312–334 Schneeweiss C (1998) On the applicability of activity based costing as a planning instrument. Int J Prod Econ 54:277–284 Wouters MJF (1994) Decision orientation of activity-based costing. Int J Prod Econ 36:75–84