The impact of cardiac CT on the appropriate utilization of catheter coronary angiography

Farrehi PM, Bernstein SJ, Rasak M et al (2002) Frequency of negative coronary arteriographic findings in patients with chest pain is related to community practice patterns. Am J Manag Care 8:643–648

Bernstein SJ, Hilborne LH, Leape LL, Park RE, Brook RH (1994) The appropriateness of use of cardiovascular procedures in women and men. Arch Intern Med 154:2759–2765

Brook RH, Park RE, Chassin MR, Solomon DH, Keesey J, Kosecoff J (1990) Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 323:1173–1177

Leape LL, Park RE, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Brook RH (1990) Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services? Jama 263:669–672

Noonan SJ, Cook JL, Keller CE et al (1995) Relationship of anatomic disease to appropriateness ratings of coronary angiography. Arch Intern Med 155:1209–1213

Phelps CE (1993) The methodologic foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care. N Engl J Med 329:1241–1245

Ayanian JZ, Landrum MB, Normand SL, Guadagnoli E, McNeil BJ (1998) Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography–do practicing physicians agree with an expert panel and with each other? N Engl J Med 338:1896–1904

Shekelle PG (2001) Are appropriateness criteria ready for use in clinical practice? N Engl J Med 344:677–678

Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB et al (2001) American college of cardiology/society for cardiac angiography and interventions clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American college of cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2170–2214

Faxon DP, McCabe CH, Kreigel DE, Ryan TJ (1982) Therapeutic and economic value of a normal coronary angiogram. Am J Med 73:500–505

Phibbs B, Fleming T, Ewy GA et al (1988) Frequency of normal coronary arteriograms in three academic medical centers and one community hospital. Am J Cardiol 62:472–474

Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487

Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323

Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T et al (2007) Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2393–2398

Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1497

Mitka M (2006) CT angiography: clearer picture, Fuzzier reception. Jama 295:1989–1990

Wann S, Nassef AL, Jeffrey J et al (2007) Ethical considerations in CT angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23:379–388

Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2007) Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 42:543–549

Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT et al (2008) Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 18:1809–1817

Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2008) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 18:592–599

Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40

Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, Daviglus M, Rich S, Kondos GT (2001) Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35, 246 adults. Am J Cardiol 87:1335–1339

Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29:766–776

Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 114:1761–1791

Brook RH (1989) Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? Jama 262:3027–3030

Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al (2006) Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:1341–1381

Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW (2006) Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1846–1849

Gilard M, Le Gal G, Cornily JC et al (2007) Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study. Arch Intern Med 167:1686–1689

Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ (2007) Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 116:1290–1305

Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154

Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546

Achenbach S, Marwan M, Schepis T et al (2009) High-pitch spiral acquisition: a new scan mode for coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:117–121

Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1618-9