The impact of Jürgen Habermas’s scientific production: a scientometric review

Abadal, E. (2012). Acceso abierto a la ciencia. Editorial UOC.

Abbasi, A., Wigand, R. T., & Hossain, L. (2014). Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance. Library and Information Science Research, 36(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.08.001

Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C. A. (2011). Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 87(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0352-7

Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics, 89(3), 929–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Ávila-Robinson, A., & Sengoku, S. (2017). Tracing the knowledge-building dynamics in new stem cell technologies through techno-scientific networks. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1691–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2436-5

Bell, D. (1976). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Basic Books.

Bhattacharyya, P. K., & Sahu, N. B. (2020). Informetric Portrait of Elinor Ostrom, the Nobel laureate in the field of economic sciences. Journal of Scientometric Research, 9(2), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.9.2.25

Bottomore, T. (2012). Dicionário do pensamento marxista (2nd ed.). Zahar.

Boudry, C., Baudouin, C., & Mouriaux, F. (2018). International publication trends in dry eye disease research: A bibliometric analysis. The Ocular Surface, 16(1), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.002

Chadegani, A., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system. In Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317

Chen, C. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21694

Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006

Chen, C. (2018). Eugene Garfield’s scholarly impact: A scientometric review. Scientometrics, 114, 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2594-5

Chen, C., & Ibekwe-SanJuan, F. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A 10 multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309

Chen, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22968

Chen, H., Jiang, W., Yang, Y., Man, X., & Tang, M. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of waste management research during the period 1997–2014. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1005–1018.

Chen, J., Su, Y., Si, H., & Chen, J. (2018). Managerial areas of construction and demolition waste: A scientometric review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112350

Dubiel, H. (1978). Wissenschaftsorganisation und politische Erfahrung: Studien zur frühen Kritischen Theorie. Suhrkamp.

Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: Quality measures of scientific publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626

Finlayson, J. (2005). Habermas: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Francisco, E. (2011). Exploration of archive in the light of bibliometrics, geoanalysis and social network. Revista De Administração De Empresas, 51(3), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902011000300008

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240

Fultner, B. (2011). Jürgen Habermas: Key Concepts. Acumen Press.

Gabriel, R., Santiago Bufrem, L., & Lima, M. (2021). Influências teóricas de Jürgen Habermas na ciência da informação indexada na BRAPCI. Logeion: Filosofia Da Informação, 7(2), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2021v7n2.p6-23

Gall, M., Nguyen, K. H., & Cutter, S. L. (2015). Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12(2015), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.010

Garfield, E. (1980). Premature discovery or delayed recognition—Why? Current Contents, 21, 5–10.

Garland, P. (2014). What can the work of Habermas offer educational researcher development programmes? Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.644785

Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course Handouts.

Glänzel, W. (2008). Seven myths in bibliometrics. About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies. In: Kretschmer & F. Havemann (Eds.), Proceedings of WIS Fourth international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics and ninth COLLNET meeting, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2008.10700836

Glänzel, W. (2014). Bibliometrics-aided retrieval—where information retrieval meets scientometrics. Scientometrics, 102, 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1480-7

Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using ‘core documents’ for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88(1), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0347-4

Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. 4. Auflage, Frankfurt am MaIn Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 1–25.

Habermas, J. (2011). The political: The rational meaning of a questionable inheritance of political theology. In E. Mendieta, & J. Vanantwerpen (Eds.), The power of religion in the public sphere (pp. 15–33). New York: Columbia University Press.

Habermas, J. (2012). Teoria do agir comunicativo: racionalidade da ação e racionalização social. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Habermas, J. (2020, abril 13). A solidariedade é a única cura. Entrevista com Jürgen Habermas. (Entrevista com Nicolas Truong). Instituto Humanitas da Unisinos. Recuperado em 13 abril, 2020, de http://www.ihu.unisinos.br/78-noticias/597983-a-solidariedade-e-a-unica-cura-entrevista-com-juergen-habermas.

Habermas, J. (1981). Philosophisch-politische Profile. M: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1983). Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. M. Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1985). Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit Kleine politische Schriften V. Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hermoso, B. (2018, agosto 28). Jürgen Habermas: “Não pode haver intelectuais se não há leitores”. El País. Recuperado em 28 agosto, 2018, de https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2018/04/25/eps/1524679056_056165.html.

Hofmann, M. (2021). Theoretical and practical influences of Habermas’s global academic best seller: Structural transformation of the public sphere in the United States. Kybernetes, 50(4), 955–968.

Inocencio, E., & Favoreto, R. (2019). Contribuições sociológicas de Jürgen Habermas para os estudos organizacionais. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo Em Administração, 14(1), 124–145. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v14i1.40097

Jiménez-García, M., Ruiz-Chico, J., Peña-Sánchez, A. R., & López-Sánchez, J. A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of sports tourism and sustainability (2002–2019). Sustainability, 12(7), 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072840

Lara, L., & Vizeu, F. (2019). O potencial da frankfurtianidade de Habermas em estudos organizacionais. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395171270

Li, J., Goerlandt, F., & Reniers, G. (2020a). Trevor Kletz’s scholarly legacy: A co-citation analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104166

Li, J., Goerlandt, F., & Reniers, G. (2020b). Mapping process safety: A retrospective scientometric analysis of three process safety related journals (1999–2018). Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 65, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104141

Liu, W., Gu, M., Hu, G., Li, C., Liao, H., Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2014). Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: A 20-year perspective. Scientometrics, 99, 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1152-z

Mao, G., Huang, N., Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2018). Research on biomass energy and environment from the past to the future: A bibliometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 1081–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.173

Mariano, A. M.; Rocha, M. S. (2017). Revisão da Literatura: Apresentação de uma Abordagem Integradora. AEDM International Conference–Economy, Business and Uncertainty: Ideas for a European and Mediterranean industrial policy. Reggio Calabria (Itália).

Marzi, G., Dabić, M., Daim, T., & Garces, E. (2017). Product and process innovation in manufacturing firms: A 30-year bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 113(2), 673–704.

Mendonça, R. (2013). Teoria crítica e democracia deliberativa: Diálogos instáveis. Opinião Pública, 19(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762013000100003

Mészáros, I. (2004). O poder da ideologia. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002

Müller-Doohm, S. (2015). Member of a school or exponent of a paradigm? Jürgen Habermas and critical theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(2), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015622049

Müller-Doohm, S. (2016). Habermas: A biography. Wiley.

Nigro, R. (2009). A virada linguístico-pragmática e o pós-positivismo. Revista Direito, Estado e Sociedade, 34, 170–211.

Nobre, M. (2012). Teoria crítica: Uma nova geração—apresentação de dossiê. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 93, 23–27.

Prado, J. W., Alcântara, V. C., Carvalho, F. M., Vieira, K. C., Machado, L. K. C., & Tonelli, D. F. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: A bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968–2014). Scientometrics, 106, 1007–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1829-6

Pendlebury, D. A. (2009). The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators. Scientometrics, 57(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-009-0008-y

Pinto, C., Serra, F. R., & Ferreira, M. P. (2014). A bibliometric study on culture research in international business. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 11(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2014309

Prusak, B. G. (2005). Rethinking “liberal eugenics”—Reflections and questions on Habermas on bioethics. Hastings Center Report, 35(6), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528563

Rawls, J. (1995). Political liberalism: Reply to Habermas. Journal of Philosophy., 92(3), 132–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/294084

Ringer, F. (1969). The decline of the German mandarins: The German academic community, 1890–1933. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626938500144

Romanelli, J., & Boschi, R. (2020). The legacy of Elinor Ostrom on common forests research assessed through bibliometric analysis. Cerne, 25, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201925042658

Romanelli, J., Fujimoto, J. T., Ferreira, M. D., & Milanez, D. H. (2018). Assessing ecological restoration as a research topic using bibliometric indicators. Ecological Engineering, 120, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.06.015

Rouanet, B. (2020). Habermas, Imaginação Dialética e Inovação Política. Revista Dissertatio De Filosofia, 9, 7–16.

Santos, R. (2003). Indicadores estratégicos em ciência e tecnologia: Refletindo a sua prática como dispositivo de inclusão/exclusão. Transinformação, 15, 129–140.

Savidan, P. (2007). Prefácio à Edição Francesa. In J. Habermas (Ed.), A ética da discussão e a questão da verdade (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Scheuerman, W. (2014). Entre o radicalismo e a resignação: Teoria democrática em Direito e democracia, de Habermas. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Política, 13, 155–185.

Siebeneichler, F. (2018). Jürgen Habermas: Uma Teoria da Comunicação Humana. Logeion: Filosofia Da Informação, 5, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2018v5n0.p8-26

Skute, I. (2019). Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 120(1), 237–265.

Taylor, C. (1999). Two theories of modernity. Public Culture., 11(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-11-1-153

Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Uddin, S., Choudhury, N., & Hossain, M. E. (2019). A research framework to explore the evolution of knowledge and academic quantification of collaborative research. Scientometrics, 119(2), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03057-4

Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T, Esser. F., Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T. & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551

Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). New York: Springer.

Van Eck, N., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van Den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2.405-2.416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421

Van Raan, A. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0301_7

Van Raan, A. (2012). Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0747-0

Vandenberghe, F. (2011). Um Estado para o cosmopolitismo. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 90, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002011000200007

Voirol, O. (2012). Teoria crítica e pesquisa social: Da dialética à reconstrução. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 93, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002012000200007

Wang, Q., & Schneider, J. (2020). Consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00011

Wuni, I., Shen, G., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2019). Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy Build, 190, 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.010

Ye, Y., & Ge, Y. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of inventory management research based on knowledge mapping. The Electronic Library, 37(1), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-11-2017-0241

Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, K., & Yao, X. (2017). Research development, current hotspots, and future directions of water research based on MODIS images: A critical review with a bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(18), 15226–15239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9107-1

Zhao, L., Deng, J., Sun, P., Liu, J., Ji, Y., Nakada, N., Qiao, Z., Tanaka, H., & Yang, Y. (2018). Nanomaterials for treating emerging contaminants in water by adsorption and photocatalysis: Systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 627, 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.006

Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., & Bassecoulard, E. (2003). Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021923329277

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629