The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum - Tập 31 - Trang 10-16 - 1988
James W. Fleshman1,2, Zane Cohen1,2, Robin S. McLeod1,2, Hartley Stern1,2, Joan Blair1,2
1Division of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
2Division of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada

Tóm tắt

A retrospective review was undertaken to determine factors important in predicting functional results following the ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure. One hundred seventy-nine patients underwent ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis at the University of Toronto between December 1981 and January 1987. One hundred sixty-three patients had ulcerative colitis, 11 had familial adenomatous polyposis, and five had Crohn's disease. A J-reservoir was constructed in 72 patients and an S-reservoir in 107 patients. Functional results were assessed in 102 patients who had had their loop ileostomies closed for more than one year. The most significant technical complications were anal anastomotic leaks (10 percent), reservoir anastomotic leaks (3.9 percent), anal anastomotic stricture (7.8 percent), late fistula-inano (2.8 percent), small-bowel obstruction (19 percent), and loop ileostomy complications (23 percent). Overweight males and patients with operative blood loss greater than 1000 cc developed anal stricture more frequently (P<.005). Patients who had a stapled J-reservoir had a higher rate of reservoir leak. The average number of bowel movements reported by patients for 24 hours was 6.2±3.1. Only ten (9.8 percent) patients had to intubate their reservoir to empty it. Urgency was experienced by 24 patients and soilage at night by 23 (22.5 percent) and during the day by 18 (17.6 percent). Seven patients (6.8 percent) were incontinent during the night and only one during the day. Pouchitis was reported in 16 patients (15.7 percent). Patients with anal anastomotic stricture had more urgency and pouchitis, and had to intubate their reservoir more frequently (P<.05). No other factors analyzed affected technical or functional results.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Parks AJ, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;2:85–8. Dozois RR. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1985; 72(suppl):S80–2. Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Grant D, Nordgren S. The pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: surgical technique and initial results. Am J Surg 1985;150:601–7. Taylor BM, Beart RW, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Phillips SF. Straight ileoanal anastomosis vs. pouch-anal anastomosis after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy. Arch Surg 1983;118:696–791. Pezim ME, Nicholls RJ. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with pelvic ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985;72:31–3. Nicholls RJ, Pescatori M, Motson RW, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with a three-loop ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 1984; 199:383–8. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987;153:157–64. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist L, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relationship to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–9. Grant D, Cohen Z, McHugh S, McLeod R, Stern H. Restorative proctocolectomy: clinical results and manometric findings with long and short rectal cuffs. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:27–32. Pescatori M, Manhire A, Bartram CL. Evacuation pouchography in the evaluation of ileoanal reservoir function. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:365–8. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PGR, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:469–73. Heppell J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW, Telander RL, Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1982;195:435–43. Stern H, Bernstein M, Killam S, Cohen Z, McLeod R. A stapled S-shaped ileoanal reservoir. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:214–9. Nicholls RJ, Moskowitz RL, Shepherd NA. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Br J Surg 1985;72(suppl):76–9. Becker JM, Raymond JL. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1986;204:375–83. Feinberg SM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z. Complications of loop ileostomy. Am J Surg 1987;153:102–7. Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Buls JG, Goldberg SM. The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In: Dozois RR. Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1985: 345–62. Beart RW, Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA. The J ileal pouchanal anastomosis: the Mayo Clinic experience. In: Dozois RR. Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers, 1985:384–97. McHugh S, Cohen Z, McLeod R. S-pouchesvs. J-pouches: a comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30: 671–7. Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P, Neill M, Wilks M, Tabaqchali S. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a pathophysiological assessment. Gut 1981;22:462–8.