The growth–equity trade-off in modern economic development: the case of Thailand

Journal of Asian Economics - Tập 14 - Trang 735-757 - 2003
Medhi Krongkaew1, Nanak Kakwani2
1School of Development Economics, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), 118 Serithai Road, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
2School of Economics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Charoemtiarana, T. (1979). Thailand: The politics of despotic paternalism. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press. Chu, Y.P., & Hill, H. (Eds.). (2001). Social impact of the Asian financial crisis. New York: Edward Elgar. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2000). Growth is good for the poor. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank. Kakwani, 2000, Growth and poverty reduction: An empirical analysis, Asian Development Review, 18, 74, 10.1142/S0116110500000099 Kakwani, N. (2002). Comment on the growth-poverty connection by Surjit Bhalla. Mimeographed. Kakwani, 2000, What is pro-poor growth?, Asian Development Review, 18, 1, 10.1142/S0116110500000014 Kakwani, N., & Son, H. (2002). Pro-poor growth and poverty reduction: The Asian experience, background paper written for “The state of progress towards the achievements of the millennium development goals in Asia and the Pacific region”. Bangkok: The Poverty Centre, Office of the Executive Secretary, ESCAP. Krongkaew, M. (1995). Contribution of agriculture to industrialisation. In M. Krongkaew (Ed.), Thailand’s industrialisation and its consequences (Chap. 2, pp. 33–65). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan. Krongkaew, M. (1996). Changes in poverty and income inequality in Thailand, 1962/1963 to 1992. In Economic growth, poverty and income inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region Project. Working Paper Series-WP1/96. School of Economics, University of New South Wales and Faculty of Economics and Thammasat University, Bangkok. Krongkaew, M. (1998). An alternative interpretation of economic policy determination in Thailand: An important interplay of bureaucracy, political power and private business. In T. Kazuo (Ed.), Asia’s development experiences: How internationally competitive national manufacturing firms have developed in Asia (pp. 311–371). Tokyo: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FASID). Krongkaew, 1992, Rural poverty in Thailand: Policy issues and responses, Asian Development Review, 10, 199, 10.1142/S0116110592000071 Muscat, R. J. (1966). Development strategy in Thailand. New York: Praeger. Muscat, R. J. (1990). Thailand and the United States: Development, security, and foreign aid. New York: Columbia University Press. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (various years). National Economic and Social Development Plans. Bangkok: NESDB. National Statistical Office (NSO). (various years). Socio-Economic Surveys (SES). Bangkok: NSO. Okun, A. (1975). Efficiency and equity: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Tinakorn, 2002, Income inequalities during four decades of national development: 1961–2001, Thammasat Economic Journal, 20, 141 Siamwalla, A., & Setboonsarng, S. (1989). Trade, exchange rate, and agricultural pricing policies in Thailand. The political economy of agricultural pricing policy. Washington, DC: World Bank. Siamwalla, A. (forthcoming). The anatomy of the Thai crisis. In P. G. Warr (Ed.), Thailand beyond the crisis. London: Routledge. World Bank. (1959). A public development program for Thailand. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.