The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation

Nature Ecology and Evolution - Tập 1 Số 11 - Trang 1677-1682
Uri Roll1, Anat Feldman2, Maria Novosolov2, Allen Allison3, Aaron M. Bauer4, Rodolphe Bernard5, Monika Böhm6, Fernando Castro‐Herrera7, Laurent Chirio, Ben Collen8, Guarino Rinaldi Colli9, Lital Dabool10, Indraneil Das11, Tiffany M. Doan12, L. Lee Grismer13, Marinus Steven Hoogmoed14, Yuval Itescu2, Fred Kraus15, Matthew LeBreton16, Amir Lewin2, Marcio Roberto Martins17, Erez Maza2, Danny Meirte18, Zoltán T. Nagy19, Cristiano de Campos Nogueira17, Olivier S. G. Pauwels20, Daniel Pincheira‐Donoso21, Gary D. Powney22, Roberto Sindaco23, Oliver Tallowin2, Omar Torres‐Carvajal24, Jean-François Trape25, Enav Vidan2, Peter Uetz26, Philipp Wagner27, Yuezhao Wang28, C. David L. Orme5, Richard Grenyer1, Shai Meiri29
1School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
2Department of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
3Hawaii Biological Survey, 4 Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI, 96817, USA
4Department of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
5Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK
6Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK
7School of Basic Sciences, Physiology Sciences Department, Universidad del Valle, Cali, 760043, Colombia
8Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
9Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70910-900, Brazil
10Department of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 31096, Israel
11Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, 94300, Malaysia
12Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
13Department of Biology, La Sierra University, Riverside, CA, 92505, USA
14Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi/CZO, Caixa Postal 399, Belém, Pará, 66017–970, Brazil
15Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann-Arbor, MI, 48109-1048, USA
16Mosaic (Environment, Health, Data, Technology), Yaoundé, Cameroon
17Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, 05508-090, Brazil
18Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 13, Tervuren, 3080, Belgium
19Joint Experimental Molecular Unit, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
20Département des Vertébrés Récents, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
21School of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, University of Lincoln, Brayford Campus, Lincoln, LN6 7DL, UK
22NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarch Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK
23Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Carmagnola, Turin, I-10022, Italy
24Museo de Zoología, Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Apartado 17-01-2184, Quito, 170525, Ecuador
25Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire de Paludologie et Zoologie Médicale, UMR MIVEGEC, Dakar, Senegal
26Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
27Zoologische Staatssammlung München, München, D-81247, Germany
28Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
29Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Grenyer, R. et al. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444, 93–96 (2006).

Orme, C. D. L. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019 (2005).

Stuart, S. N. et al. Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306, 1783–1786 (2004).

Brooks, T. M. et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–61 (2006).

Kremen, C. et al. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 320, 222–226 (2008).

Wilson, K. A., McBride, M. F., Bode, M. & Possingham, H. P. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440, 337–340 (2006).

Holt, B. G. et al. An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339, 74–78 (2013).

Schipper, J. et al. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322, 225–230 (2008).

Bates, S. T. et al. Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil. ISME J. 5, 908–917 (2011).

Morueta-Holme, N. et al. Habitat area and climate stability determine geographical variation in plant species range sizes. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1446–1454 (2013).

Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Integrating abundance and functional traits reveals new global hotspots of fish diversity. Nature 501, 539–542 (2013).

Tittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).

Mittermeier, R. A. et al. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Ecoregions (CEMEX, Mexico City, 2004).

Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: a representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 12, 502–515 (1998).

Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA) Digital Boundaries. Version 2015 2 (BirdLife Intranational, Cambridge, 2015).

Jetz, W. & Rahbek, C. Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297, 1548–1551 (2002).

Lennon, J. J., Koleff, P., Greenwood, J. J. D. & Gaston, K. J. Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 7, 81–87 (2004).

Joppa, L. N., Visconti, P., Jenkins, C. N. & Pimm, S. L. Achieving the Convention on Biological Diversity’s goals for plant conservation. Science 341, 1100–1103 (2013).

Naidoo, R. & Iwamura, T. Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities. Biol. Conserv. 140, 40–49 (2007).

Moilanen, A. et al. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272, 1885–1891 (2005).

Pianka, E. R. in Lacertids of the Mediterranean Region (eds Valakos, E. D., Böhme, W., Pérez-Mellado, V. & Maragou, P.) 121–154 (Hellenic Zoological Society, University of Athens, Athens, 1993).

Lewin, A. et al. Patterns of species richness, endemism and environmental gradients of African reptiles. J. Biogeogr. 43, 2380–2390 (2016).

Powney, G. D., Grenyer, R., Orme, C. D. L., Owens, I. P. F. & Meiri, S. Hot, dry and different: Australian lizard richness is unlike that of mammals, amphibians and birds. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 386–396 (2010).

Böhm, M. et al. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385 (2013).

Meiri, S. & Chapple, D. G. Biases in the current knowledge of threat status in lizards, and bridging the ‘assessment gap’. Biol. Conserv. 2014A, 6–15 (2016).

Roll, U. et al. Using Wikipedia page views to explore the cultural importance of global reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 204A, 42–50 (2016).

Bode, M. et al. Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6498–6501 (2008).

Hawkins, B. A. et al. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84, 3105–3117 (2003).

Uetz, P. & Hošek, J. The Reptile Database (2015); http://www.reptile-database.org/

Pouzols, F. M. et al. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516, 383–386 (2014).

Scott, J. M. et al. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monogr. 123, 3–41 (1993).

Maldonado, C. et al. Estimating species diversity and distribution in the era of Big Data: to what extent can we trust public databases? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 973–984 (2015).

Maréchaux, I., Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Charpentier, A. The value of coarse species range maps to inform local biodiversity conservation in a global context. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02598 (2016).

Cantú-Salazar, L. & Gaston, K. J. Species richness and representation in protected areas of the Western Hemisphere: discrepancies between checklists and range maps. Divers. Distrib. 19, 782–793 (2013).

Anselin, L. Local indicators of spatial association — LISA. Geogr. Anal. 27, 93–115 (1995).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Nature Ecology and Evolution

Tập 1 Số 11

1677-1682

Thông tin tác giả