The future of fish passage science, engineering, and practice
Tóm tắt
Much effort has been devoted to developing, constructing and refining fish passage facilities to enable target species to pass barriers on fluvial systems, and yet, fishway science, engineering and practice remain imperfect. In this review, 17 experts from different fish passage research fields (i.e., biology, ecology, physiology, ecohydraulics, engineering) and from different continents (i.e., North and South America, Europe, Africa, Australia) identified knowledge gaps and provided a roadmap for research priorities and technical developments. Once dominated by an engineering‐focused approach, fishway science today involves a wide range of disciplines from fish behaviour to socioeconomics to complex modelling of passage prioritization options in river networks. River barrier impacts on fish migration and dispersal are currently better understood than historically, but basic ecological knowledge underpinning the need for effective fish passage in many regions of the world, including in biodiversity hotspots (e.g., equatorial Africa, South‐East Asia), remains largely unknown. Designing efficient fishways, with minimal passage delay and post‐passage impacts, requires adaptive management and continued innovation. While the use of fishways in river restoration demands a transition towards fish passage at the community scale, advances in selective fishways are also needed to manage invasive fish colonization. Because of the erroneous view in some literature and communities of practice that fish passage is largely a proven technology, improved international collaboration, information sharing, method standardization and multidisciplinary training are needed. Further development of regional expertise is needed in South America, Asia and Africa where hydropower dams are currently being planned and constructed.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aarestrup K., 2017, Another paradigm lost? Autumn downstream migration of juvenile brown trout: Evidence for a presmolt migration, Ecology of Freshwater Fish
Agostinho A. A., 2004, Fisheries management in Brazilian reservoirs: Lessons from/for South America, Interciencia, 29, 334
Allison P. D., 2010, Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide
Araújo‐Lima C. A. R. M., 2003, Migratory fishes of south america: Biology, fisheries and conservation status, 233
Baras E., 2001, Impacts of man's modifications of river hydrology on the migration of freshwater fishes: A mechanistic perspective, Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 1, 291
Bennett A. F., 1991, Nature conservation 2: The role of corridors, 99
Birnie‐Gauvin K., 2017, Shining a light on the loss of rheophilic fish habitat in lowland rivers as a forgotten consequence of barriers, and its implications for management, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 10.1002/aqc.2795
Bok A. Rooseboom A. &Rossouw J.(2004).Guidelines for the planning design and operation of fishways in South Africa. Water Research Commission.
Bruinsma J.(2009).The resource outlook to 2050. Paper presented at FAO Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050 Rome 24–26 June 2009
Candee M.(2016).Impacts of a restoration project on elements of the brown trout (Salmo trutta) smolt migration ‐ A case study from Villestrup Å. Technical University of Denmark.
CanFishPass. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fecpl.ca/projects/canfishpass-inventory-of-canadian-fish-passage-facilities/
Castro‐Santos T., 2012, Adaptive fishway design: A framework and rationale for effective evaluations, Monitoring, Funktionskontrollen und Qualitätssicherung an Fischaufstiegsanlagen, 2, 76
Castro‐Santos T., 2009, Challenges for diadromous fishes in a dynamic global environment, 557
Castro‐Santos T., 2006, Fish physiology volume 23: Fish biomechanics, 469
Castro‐Santos T., 2012, Telemetry techniques, 427
Clay C. H., 1995, Design of fishways and other fish facilities
Cooke S. J., 2012, Fisheries techniques, 819
Dixon D. &Hogan T.(2015).Session B3: Alden Fish‐Friendly Hydropower Turbine: History and Development Status. International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage. 30.
Dudgeon D., 2005, River rehabilitation for conservation of fish biodiversity in monsoonal Asia, Ecology and Society, 10, 1, 10.5751/ES-01469-100215
EPRI‐DOE(2011).Conference on Environmentally‐Enhanced Hydropower Turbines: Technical Papers. EPRI Palo Alto CA and U.S. Department of Energy Washington D.C.: 1024609 xxiv+1‐1 to 1‐6 + 2‐1 to 2‐225 + 3‐1 to 3‐6.
FAO/DVWK, 2002, Fish passes – design, dimensions and monitoring
FishBase. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fishbase.org/search.php.
de Fraiture C., 2007, Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture, 91
Gough P. Philipsen P. Schollema P. P. &Wanningen H.(2012).From Sea to Source: International guidance for the restoration of fish migration highways. Regional Water Authority Hunze en Aa's Netherlands. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fromseatosource.com/?page=HOME
Harris J., 2016, Mitigating the effects of barriers to freshwater fish migrations: The Australian experience, Marine and Freshwater Research, 68, 614, 10.1071/MF15284
Harris L. D., 1991, Nature conservation 2: The role of corridors, 189
Hinch S. G., 2000, Effects of swim speed and activity pattern on success of adult sockeye salmon migration through an area of difficult passage, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129, 589, 10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129<0598:EOSSAA>2.0.CO;2
Hosmer D. W., 1999, Applied survival analysis
Jewitt D., 2015, Systematic land‐cover change in KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa: Implications for biodiversity South African Journal of Science, 111, 9, 10.17159/sajs.2015/20150019
Katopodis C. Chilibeck B. Kemp P. &Johnson W.(2007).Development of guidance and fish passage facilities for multiple downstream migrating species through physical and numerical hydraulic modelling for the proposed Dunvegan Hydroelectric Project on the Peace River northern Alberta Canada. Proc. 6th Int'l Symposium on Ecohydraulics Christchurch New Zealand Feb. 18‐23 4 p.
Katopodis C. Shepherd D. Johnson W. &Kemp P.(2004).Hydraulic modelling of a nature‐mimicking fishway design for the proposed Dunvegan Hydroelectric Project on the Peace River northern Alberta Canada. Proc. 5th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics Aquatic Habitats: Analysis & Restoration Sept. 12‐17 Madrid Spain Published by IAHR Vol. II: 1052‐1057.
Khai H., 2014, Choice modeling: Assessing the non‐market environmental values of the biodiversity conservation of swamp forest in Vietnam, International Journal of Energy, Environment and Engineering, 5, 77, 10.1007/s40095-014-0077-5
Kristensen E. A., 2014, Dansk fiskeindeks for vandløb (DFFV)
Kulik G., 1985, The countryside in the age of capitalist transformation: Essays in the social history of rural America, 25
Larinier M., 2004, Proceedings of the second international symposium on the management of large rivers for fisheries, 183
Lauder G. V., 2000, Biomechanics in animal behaviour, 19
Lucas M. C., 2000, Advances in fish telemetry, 117
Movebank. Retrieved fromhttps://www.movebank.org/
Nicola G. G., 1996, Dams and fish passage facilities in the large rivers of Spain: Effects on migratory species, Archives of Hydrobiology, 10, 375
Nieminen E., 2016, Economic and policy considerations regarding hydropower and migratory fish, Fish and Fisheries, 18, 54, 10.1111/faf.12167
Northwest Power and Conservation Council(2016)15th Annual Report to the Northwest Governors Fish & Wildlife Costs. Portland OR USA. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nwcouncil.org/media/7150247/2016-4.pdf
Swimway South Africa. Retrieved fromhttp://riversoflife.co.za/sa-swimway-programme/
Washburn E. Hateley J. &Gregory J.(2015).Monitoring fish pass performance: towards a European standard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage 2015. June 23 2015 Available at the University of Massachusetts ‐ Amherst. Retrieved fromhttp://scholarworks.umass.edu/fishpassage_conference/2015/June23/3/
Wasserman R. J., 2011, The effects of instream barriers on the distribution of migratory marine‐spawned fishes in the lower reaches of the Sundays River, South Africa. Water SA, 37, 495
Williams J. G., 1998, Fish migration and fish bypasses, 180
Williams J. G., 1992, Restoring the nation's marine environment, 405