The first 30 min hidden aftershocks of the 2022 September 17, ML 6.4, Guanshan, Taiwan earthquake and its seismological implications
Tóm tắt
The first 30 min of the aftershock sequence following the 2022 September 17, ML 6.4, Guanshan, Taiwan earthquake is investigated by the back-projection (BP) method. Based on the Automatic Gain Control (AGC) to process individual earthquake record and sort waveforms by epicentral distance, 80 events are identified near the Guanshan earthquake epicenter to verify its temporal variation. However, most of these events cannot clearly image by the BP method to determine its spatial locations for its small amplitude and short time separation. In total, 29 aftershocks are imaged by this study to identify its spatial locations during this time period. The relocated events are compared with the Central Weather Bureau (CWB) rapid report catalogue. Only 5 events have been reported by the CWB rapid report catalogue. These unreported hidden aftershocks are identified to distribute surrounding the epicenter and extended to the east. This extracted information of hidden aftershocks is crucial for assessing the potential for future large aftershocks and estimating the associated seismic hazards in a given region, and provide extra message to evaluate the source physics in general.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beskardes GD, Hole JA, Wang K, Michaelides M, Wu Q, Chapman MC, Davenport KK, Brown LD, Quiros DA (2018) A comparison of earthquake backprojection imaging methods for dense local arrays. Geophys J Int 212(3):1986–2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx520
Chen YL, Shin TC (1998) Study of the earthquake location of 3-D velocity structure in Taiwan area. Meteorol Bull 42:135–169
Gadallah M, Fisher R (2005) Applied seismology: a comprehensive guide to seismic theory and application. PennWell, USA, p 600
Gadallah M, Fisher R (2009) Exploration geophysics. Springer, Berlin, p 274
Gulia L, Rinaldi AP, Tormann T, Vannucci G, Enescu B, Wiemer S (2018) The effect of a mainshock on the size distribution of the aftershocks. Geophys Res Lett 45:13277–13287. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080619
Huang BS (1996) A Fortran 77 Program to compute seismic rays travelling inside a radially inhomogeneous earth. Comput Geosci 22:287–303
Huang BS, Huang WG, Huang YL, Kuo LC, Chen KC, Angelier J (2009) Complex fault rupture during the 2003 Chengkung, Taiwan earthquake sequence from dense seismic array and GPS observations. Tectonophysics 466:184–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.025
Huang CM, Chang LH, Kuo-Chen H, Zhuang Y (2023) SeisBlue: a deep-learning data processing platform for seismology, EGU General Assembly 2023, Vienna, Austria, 24–28 Apr 2023, EGU23-13927. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13927.
Ishii M, Shearer PM, Houston H, Vidale JE (2005) Extent, duration and speed of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake imaged by the Hi-Net array. Nature 435:933–936
Ishii M, Shearer PM, Houston H, Vidale JE (2007) Teleseismic P wave imaging of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Sumatra earthquake ruptures using the Hi-net array. J Geophys Res 122:B11307. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004700
Kiser E, Ishii M (2013) Hidden aftershocks of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku, Japan earthquake imaged with the backprojection method. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118:5564–5576. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010158
Klein FW (1978) Hypocenter location program Hypoinverse. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open- File Report. 78-694.
Klein FW (2003) The Hypoinverse2000 earthquake location program. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International Handbook of Earthquake & Engineering Seismology, Part B. Academic Press, London (for International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior), p. 1619–1620
Kuo-Chen H, Sun W, Huang C, Pan S (2022) Near real-time seismic data processing helps scientist understand aftershocks, Temblor. https://doi.org/10.32858/temblor.276
Lahr JC (1989) Hypoellipse/Version 2.0: A computer program for determining local earthquakes hypocentral parameters, magnitude, and first motion pattern. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-116, pp. 92
Lahr JC (2003) The Hypoellipse earthquake location program. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International Handbook of Earthquake & Engineering Seismology, Part B. Academic Press, London (for International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior), pp. 1617–1618
Lee Y-H, Chen G-T, Rau R-J, Ching K-E (2008) Coseismic displacement and tectonic implication of 1951 Longitudinal Valley earthquake sequence, eastern Taiwan. J Geophys Res 113:B04305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005180
Lee SJ, Liu TY, Lin TC (2023) The role of the west-dipping collision boundary fault in the Taiwan 2022 Chihshang earthquake sequence. Sci Rep. 13:3552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30361-0
Lee WHK, Lahr JC (1975) HYPO71 (revised): a computer program for determining hypocenter, magnitude and first motion pattern of local earthquakes. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 75-311, pp 116
Lee WHK, Lahr JC, Valdes CM (2003) The HYPO71 earthquake location program. In: Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International Handbook of Earthquake & Engineering Seismology, Part B. Academic Press, London (for International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth’s Interior), pp. 1641–1642
Lienert BR, Havskov J (1995) A computer program for locating earthquakes both locally and globally. Seismol Res Lett 66(5):26–36
Lin CW, Liu YC, Chou PS, Lin YH (2021) Recent development of active fault investigations of Taiwan. Bull Centr Geol Surv 34:1–40
Meng L, Inbal A, Ampuero J-P (2011) A window into the complexity of the dynamic rupture of the 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 38:L00G07. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048118
Mozziconacci L, Delouis B, Huang BS, Lee JC, Béthoux N (2013a) Determining fault geometry from the distribution of coseismic fault slip related to the 2006 Taitung Earthquake, Eastern Taiwan. Bull Seisl Soc Am 103:394–411. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110232
Mozziconacci L, Huang BS, Delouis B, Lee JC, Lee SJ (2013b) Rupture behavior of a Moderate earthquake (MW 5.9, April 2006) and its close relation with the 2003 Chengkung earthquake (Mw 6.8) at the Southern Termination of the plate boundary, Southeast Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci 75:213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.07.025
Roecker SW, Yeh YH, Tsai YB (1987) Three-dimensional P and S wave velocity structures beneath Taiwan—deep structure beneath an arc-continent collision. J Geophys Res 92:10547–10570
Shyu JBH, Sieh K, Chen YG, Chung LH (2006) Geomorphic analysis of the central range fault, the second major active structure of the Longitudinal Valley suture, eastern Taiwan. Geol Soc Am Bull 118:1447–1462. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25905.1
Shyu JBH, Chung LH, Chen YG, Lee JC, Sieh K (2007) Re-evaluation of the surface ruptures of the November 1951 earthquake series in eastern Tai- wan, and its neotectonic implications. J Asian Earth Sci 31:317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.07.018
Sun W, Pan SY, Huang CM, Guan ZK, Yen IC, Ho CW, Chi TC, Ku CS, Huang BS, Fu CC, Kuo-Chen H (2023) Deep learning-based earthquake catalog reveals the rupture process of the 2022 Mw 6.9 Chihshang earthquake sequence, submitted to “Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences”, Special issue of 2022 Eastern Taiwan Longitudinal Valley Earthquakes on August 29, 2023
Wen S, Wen YY, Ching KE, Yeh YL, Lee YH (2019) Tectonic implications on the 2018 Hualien Earthquake. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 30:389–398. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2019.01.28.01
Zhang Y, An Y, Long F, Zhu G, Qin M, Zhong Y, Xu Q, Yang H (2021) Short-term foreshock and aftershock patterns of the 2021 Ms 6.4 Yangbi Earthquake Sequence. Seismol Res Lett 93:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220210154