The fire frequency‐severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests
Tóm tắt
Fire is one of the most important natural disturbance processes in the western United States and ecosystems differ markedly with respect to their ecological and evolutionary relationships with fire. Reference fire regimes in forested ecosystems can be categorized along a gradient ranging from “fuel‐limited” to “climate‐limited” where the former types are often characterized by frequent, lower‐severity wildfires and the latter by infrequent, more severe wildfires. Using spatial data on fire severity from 1984–2011 and metrics related to fire frequency, we tested how divergence from historic (pre‐Euroamerican settlement) fire frequencies due to a century of fire suppression influences rates of high‐severity fire in five forest types in California. With some variation among bioregions, our results suggest that fires in forest types characterized by fuel‐limited fire regimes (e.g., yellow pine and mixed conifer forest) tend to burn with greater proportions of high‐severity fire as either time since last fire or the mean modern fire return interval (FRI) increases. Two intermediate fire regime types (mixed evergreen and bigcone Douglas‐fir) showed a similar relationship between fire frequency and fire severity. However, red fir and redwood forests, which are characterized by more climate‐limited fire regimes, did not show significant positive relationships between FRI and fire severity. This analysis provides strong evidence that for fuel‐limited fire regimes, lack of fire leads to increasing rates of high‐severity burning. Our study also substantiates the general validity of “fuel‐limited” vs. “climate‐limited” explanations of differing patterns of fire effects and response in forest types of the western US.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Agee J. K, 1993, Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests
Barbour M. G, 1993, California's changing landscapes: diversity and conservatoin of California vegetation
Bates D, 2012, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 classes. R package version 1.0-4
Heinselman M. L, 1981, Fire intensity and frequency as factors in the distribution and structure of northern ecosystems, Fire regimes and ecosystem properties. General Technical Report WO-26
Huston M. A, 2003, Understanding the effects of fire and other mortality-causing disturbances on species diversity, Fire in south-western Australian forests: impacts and management, 51
Keeley J. D, 2012, Fire in mediterranean ecosystems
Key C. H, 2006, Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Indes, FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System. General Technical Report
McDonald P. M, 1990, Conifers, Agricultural Handbook 654, 520
Minnich R. A, 1980, Wildfire and the geographic relationships between canyon live oak, Coulter pine, and bigcone Douglas-fir forests, Proceedings of the symposium on ecology, management, and utilization of California oaks
Pickett S. T. A, 1985, The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics
Pillers M. D, 1989, Fine fuel dynamics of old growth redwood forests
R Development Core Team, 2011, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Safford H. D, 2013, Using Fire Return Interval Departure (FRID) analysis to map spatial and temporal changes in fire frequency on National Forest lands in California. Research Paper PSW-RP-266
Schmidt K. M, 2002, Development of course-sclae spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-87
Stuart J. D, 2006, North Coast bioregion, Fire in California's ecosystems, 147