The fault in Japan’s stars: Shinzo Abe, North Korea, and the quest for a new Japanese constitution
Tóm tắt
In the wake of North Korea’s progressive missile testing that set even the usually stoic Japanese people into a panic mode, Japan has found itself at the mercy of its former enemies. In an ironic twist of fate, Tokyo’s security outlooks seem to have become hostage to the strategic calculations of its fiercest nemesis in the past. This paper asks whether Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s desire for constitutional change is precipitated mainly by the resurgence of Japanese nationalist sentiments as what many of his critics claim, or if there are genuinely rational justifications for revising the country’s 72-year old Constitution. And if so, why has it been so elusive for many Japanese leaders? Using neoclassical realism theory, I analyze the structural contexts and domestic intervening variables that simultaneously drive and prevent the realization of constitutional change in Japan. I argue that state leaders like Abe and those who have come before him have always been prone to acquiring flawed and inaccurate perceptions of the systemic stimuli; susceptible to making irrational and unsound decisions; and ineffective at mobilizing the national resources demanded by their preferred policies and strategies. Thus, despite having rational justifications, the quest for constitutional change has remained elusive for many Japanese leaders. Success will require Abe to carefully harmonize domestic and international expectations; prudently balance Japan’s benign security intentions and hawkish military strategies; and shift away from his pragmatic–ambivalent style of domestic politics.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abe, S. 2017. Solidarity against the North Korean threat. The New York Times, September 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/opinion/north-korea-shinzo-abe-japan.html.
Arase, D. 2007. Japan, the active state? Security policy after 9//11. Asian Survey 47(4): 560–583.
Berkofsky, A. 2012. A pacifist constitution for an armed empire: Past and present of the Japanese security and defense policies. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
Blair, G. 2017. With a landslide win, Shinzo Abe could be ready to rewrite Japan’s pacifist constitution. Los Angeles Times, October 22. http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-japan-election-20171022-story.html.
Boyd, P., and R. Samuels. 2005. Nine lives? The politics of constitutional reform in Japan. East-West Center Policy Studies Series (19): 1–82. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/26090/PS019.pdf.
Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J.D. Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.
Byman, D.L., and K.M. Pollack. 2001. Let us now praise great men: Bringing the statesman back in. International Security 25(4): 107–146.
Christensen, T.J. 1996. Useful adversaries: Grand strategy, domestic mobilization, and Sino-American conflict, 1947–1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Colvin, J., and J. Lemire. 2017. Trump says U.S. will arm Japan to shoot down N Korean missiles. Japan Today, November 7. https://japantoday.com/category/politics/Trump-says-U.S.-will-arm-Japan-to-shoot-down-N-Korean-missiles.
Dower, J. 2000. Embracing defeat: Japan in the wake of World War II. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Easley, L.E., K. Tetsuo, and A. Mori. 2010. Electing a new Japanese Security policy? Examining foreign policy visions within the Democratic Party of Japan. Asia Policy 9(1): 45–66.
Fareed, Z. 1998. From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fifield, A. 2017a. Japanese prime minister’s poll numbers are so low they make Trump’s look good. The Washington Post, July 27. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/japanese-prime-ministers-poll-numbers-are-so-low-they-make-trumps-look-good/2017/07/27/481356e8-728c-11e7-803f-a6c989606ac7_story.html?utm_term=.5d18985ab985.
Fifield, A. 2017b. Abe may have hit a snag in plans to revise Japan’s pacifist constitution: His own party. The Washington Post, December 14. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/abe-may-have-hit-a-snag-in-plans-to-revise-japans-pacifist-constitution-his-own-party/2017/12/13/e3c651aa-df22-11e7-9eb6-e3c7ecfb4638_story.html?utm_term=.34aa255e9e5a.
Foulon, M. 2015. Neoclassical realism: Challengers and bridging identities. International Studies Review 17(4): 635–661.
Friedberg, A.L. 1988. The weary Titan: Britain and the experience of relative decline, 1895–1905. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hagström, L. 2010. The Democratic Party of Japan’s security policy and Japanese politics of constitutional revision: A cloud over Article 9? Australian Journal of International Affairs 64(5): 510–525.
Hatoyama, Y. 1999. The constitution should acknowledge the SDF as armed forces. Bungeishunjū, October 1999, pp. 262–273.
Holsti, O.R. 1979. Theories of crisis decision-making. In Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory, and policy, ed. P.D. Lauren, 99–136. New York, NY: Free Press.
Hook, G., and G. McCormack. 2001. Japan’s contested constitution: Documents and analysis. London: Routledge.
Hughes, C. 2004. Japan’s re-emergence as a ‘normal ‘military power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, C. 2006. Why Japan could revise its constitution and what it would mean for Japanese security policy. Orbis 50(4): 725–744.
Hurst, D. 2017. Shinzo Abe and wife accused of giving cash to ultra-nationalist school. The Guardian, March 23. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/23/shinzo-abe-wife-akie-accused-giving-cash-ultra-nationalist-school.
Ishikawa, M. 1995. Postwar political history. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten
Itoh, M. 2001. Japanese constitutional revision: A neo-liberal proposal for article 9 in comparative perspective. Asian Survey 41(2): 310–327.
Jervis, R. 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kataoka, T. 1991. The price of a constitution: The origin of Japan’s post-war politics. New York: Taylor & Francis.
King, A. 2014. China’s response to Japan’s constitutional reinterpretation. East Asia Forum, July 27. http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/07/27/china-responds-to-japans-constitutional-reinterpretation/.
Kua, Y.L. 2017. Trump’s Asia trip: 10 best quotes. Strait Times, November 14. http://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/ten-of-trumps-best-quotes-on-his-trip-to-asia.
Liberal Democratic Party. 2012. LDP announces a new draft constitution for Japan. May 7. https://www.jimin.jp/english/news/117099.html.
Liff, A. 2015. Japan’s defense policy: Abe the evolutionary. The Washington Quarterly 38(2): 79–99.
Lobell, S., N. Ripsman and J.W. Taliaferro (eds.). 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCurry, J. 2017. Japan’s general election: All you need to know. The Guardian, October 16. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/oct/16/japan-general-election-all-you-need-to-know.
Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization 51(4): 513–553.
Nakasone, Y. 2000. My ideas on constitutional revisions. Shokun, April 2000, pp. 55–56.
Nogi, K. 2017. Abe says N Korean missile tests are ‘imminent threat’. Japan Today, December 5. https://japantoday.com/category/politics/north-korea-missile-tests-are-%27imminent-threat%27-japan.
Osaki, T. 2016. LDP sets aside 2012 draft constitution ahead of Diet debate on revision. Japan Times, October 18. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/10/18/national/politics-diplomacy/ldp-sets-aside-2012-draft-constitution-ahead-diet-debate-revision/#.Wnp7fWaB1p-.
Osaki, T. 2017. Abe claims victory as powerful endorsement, may seek re-election next month. Japan Times, October 23. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/10/23/national/politics-diplomacy/abe-claims-victory-powerful-endorsement-may-seek-re-election-next-month/#.Wnfw92aB1p8.
Osaki, T., and D. Kikuchi. 2017. Abe declares 2020 as goal for new Constitution. Japan Times, May 3. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/05/03/national/politics-diplomacy/abe-declares-2020-goal-new-constitution/#.Wnp-2WaB1p9.
Ozawa, I. 1999. Nihonkoku kempo kaisei shian [A draft proposal for revisions to the Japanese Constitution], Bungei Shunju, September 9, pp.94–106.
Panton, M. 2010. Politics, practice and pacifism: Revisiting Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 11(2): 164–218.
Piotrowski, K. 2005. Keeping pace with the progress of the world: Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. Washington University Law Review 83(5): 1653–1677.
Politi, D. 2017. Trump reportedly can’t understand why Japan didn’t shoot down North Korea missiles. Slate, November 5. http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/11/05/trump_reportedly_can_t_understand_why_japan_didn_t_shoot_down_north_korea.html.
Putnam, R. 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.
Rathbun, B. 2008. A rose by any other name: Neoclassical realism as the logical and necessary extension of structural realism. Security Studies 17(2): 294–321.
Repeta, L. 2013. Japan’s democracy at risk—The LDP’s ten most dangerous proposals for constitutional change. The Asia-Pacific Journal 11(3): 1–12.
Repeta, Lawrence. 2015. Japan’s proposed National Security Legislation—Will this be the end of Article 9. The Asia-Pacific Journal 13(1): 1–11.
Ripsman, N. 2011. Neoclassical realism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies.
Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51(1): 144–172.
Sasaki, T. 2015. Japan’s postwar military and civil society: Contesting a better life. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Schweller, R.L. 2003. The progressiveness of neoclassical realism. In Progress in international relations theory: Appraising the field, ed. C. Elman and M. Elman, 311–347. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Soble, J. 2017. Bigotry and fraud scandal at kindergarten linked to Japan’s first lady. The New York Times, February 24. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/24/world/asia/japan-abe-first-lady-school.html.
Stewart, P. 2017. North Korea threat is ‘critical, imminent,’ Japan tells U.S., South Korea. Reuters, October 23. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asia-mattis-japan/north-korea-threat-is-critical-imminent-japan-tells-u-s-south-korea-idUSKBN1CS18K.
Stoessinger, J.G. 2005. Why nations go to war. Belmont, MA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Tachikawa, T. 2017. Abe’s support for ‘all options’ on North Korea complicates efforts to bring abductees home. Japan Times, November 7. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/11/07/national/politics-diplomacy/abes-support-options-north-korea-complicates-efforts-bring-abductees-home/#.Wnp-iGaB1p9.
Taliaferro, J.W. 2006. State building for future wars: Neoclassical realism and the resource-extractive state. Security Studies 15(3): 464–495.
Taylor, A. 2017. Changing Japan’s pacifist constitution won’t be easy for Abe. The Washington Post, October 24. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/changing-japans-pacifist-constitution-wont-be-easy-for-abe/2017/10/24/5b11b1d4-b82a-11e7-9b93-b97043e57a22_story.html?utm_term=.2b2d649bad09.
The Asahi Shimbun. 2018. Editorial: Abe needs to focus on Japan’s future, not his reign in power. January 2. http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201801020020.html.
The Japan Times. 2016. The LDP’s draft constitution. August 24, 2016. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2016/08/24/commentary/japancommentary/ldps-draft-constitution/#.XTnoYC2ZOu4.
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.
Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winkler, C. 2011. The quest for Japan’s new constitution: An analysis of visions and constitutional reform proposals, 1980–2009. Oxon: Routledge.
Wohlforth, W.C. 1993. The elusive balance: Power and perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Yoshida, R. 2017a. Abe urges diplomatic tack on North Korea, but rules out ‘dialogue for dialogue’s sake’. Japan Times, April 17. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/04/17/national/politics-diplomacy/abe-urges-diplomatic-tack-north-korea-rules-dialogue-dialogues-sake/#.WnqBZmaB1p9.
Yoshida, R. 2017b. Abe softens stance on deadline for constitutional reform proposals, deferring to LDP. Japan Times, August 4. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/08/04/national/politics-diplomacy/abe-softens-stance-deadline-constitutional-reform-proposals-deferring-ldp/#.WnqBnGaB1p8.