The evolution of production systems and conceptual frameworks

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management - Tập 18 Số 8 - Trang 949-965 - 2007
AfonsoFleury1, MariaTereza Fleury2
1Production Engineering Department, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
2School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe development of a conceptual framework for the study of production systems in general derived from the analysis of the telecommunications industry; since this industry is considered as one of the pillars of the coming information society and knowledge economy, the application of that framework to other industries and production systems brings insights as to their recent changes and future trends. This paper looks at the stream of frameworks proposed for production and operations management, with the intent of contributing to the debate by addressing the following question: would an analytical framework derived from the telecommunications industry have distinct features relative to the analytic frameworks currently in use?Design/methodology/approachFollowing a literature review of the evolution of the telecommunications industry, the framework (TbF for telecommunications‐based framework) was built from scratch, using grounded theory, case studies and Delphi methods. The field for research was the Brazilian Telecommunications industry, considered as a microcosm of the whole industry. The TbF was then applied to the automobile and textile/apparel industries for illustration purposes.FindingsThe TbF is composed by six types of companies, characterised by distinct profiles of organisational competences, interacting according to some specific patterns of relationships. Compared to the most commonly used conceptual frameworks, the TbF allows for critical assessments in regards to their basic assumptions and reveals ways to evolve in direction of more dynamic approaches to the study of production systems.Research limitations/implicationsAs all other conceptual frameworks, the TbF is a simplification of reality and so its use requires a clear view of its assumptions. In regards to generalisation, the main assumption of the TbF is that other industries and production systems are accelerating their “clockspeeds” over time. As to the TbF's limitations, the main drawback relates to its development being derived from the most “traditional” segment of the telecommunications industry. This led to the exclusion of the internet‐enabled industries which promise a great impact in the near future.Practical implicationsThe main contribution is for practical work in the academic and consultancy spheres, because what is under investigation is the way in which knowledge about production systems is being produced. The use of the TbF might disclose the limitations of the most commonly used conceptual frameworks and reveal ways to produce knowledge which is more aligned to the dynamism and complexity of production systems now and in the future.Originality/valueThe TbF is original in its structure. Its value in the creation of knowledge which is relevant and applicable still depends on further development.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Berger, S. (2005), How We Compete, Currency‐Doubleday, New York, NY.

Brusoni, S. and Prencipe, A. (2001), “Unpacking the black box of modularity: technologies, products, organisations”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10, pp. 179‐205.

Davies, A., Tang, P., Brady, T., Hobday, M., Rush, H. and Gann, D. (1999), Integrated Solutions: the New Economy between Manufacturing and Services, CENTRIM, University of Brighton, Brighton, mimeo, p. 45.

Fine, C. (1998), Clockspeed, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Fleury, A. and e Fleury, M.T. (2003), “The evolution of strategies and organizational competences in the telecommunications industry”, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, Vol. 2 No. 2.

Fleury, A. and e Fleury, M.T. (2005), “In search of competence: aligning strategy and competences in the telecommunications industry”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16, pp. 1640‐55.

Fransman, M. (2001), “Evolution of telecommunications industry into the internet age”, The International Handbook on Telecommunications Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, Aldershot.

Fransman, M. (2002), Telecoms in the Internet Age, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Frigant, V. and Talbot, D. (2004), “Convergence et diversité du passage à la production modulaire dans l'aéronautique et l'automobile en Europe”, Actes du GERPISA,Vol. 37, GERPISA, Paris, pp. 107‐18.

Gereffi, G. (1994), “Capitalism, development and global commodity chains”, in Sclair, L. (Ed.), Capitalism and Development, Routledge, London.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. (2002), “Developing a theory of global value chains: a framework document”, paper presented at the Global Value Chains Conference, Rockport, MA, April 25‐28, p. 24.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. (2005), “The governance of global value chains”, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, pp. 78‐104.

Gerstner, L. Jr (2003), Who Says Elephants can't Dance?, Harper Collins Publishers, New York, NY.

Glaser, G. and Strauss, A. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine de Gruyter, Berlin.

Harland, C.M., Lamming, R.C., Zheng, J. and Johnsen, T.E. (2001), “A taxonomy of supply networks”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Fall, pp. 21‐7.

Hayes, R., Pisano, G., Upton, D. and Wheelwright, S. (2005), Pursuing the Competitive Edge, Wiley, New York, NY.

Hobday, M., Davies, A. and Prencipe, A. (2005), “Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14 No. 6.

Johansen, J. and Riis, J. (2005), “The interactive firm‐towards a new paradigm”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 202‐16.

Karlsson, C. (2003), “The development of international networks: challenges for operations management in the extraprise”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23, pp. 44‐61.

Kim, L. (1993), “National system of industrial innovation: dynamics of capability building in Korea”, in Nelson, R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 357‐83.

Lung, Y. (2003), “The challenges of the European automotive industry at the beginning of the 21st century”, paper presented at Auto Industry Symposium The RIETI – Hosei – MIT‐IMVP Meeting, p. 18.

Nelson, R. and Rosenberg, N. (1993), “Technical innovation and national systems”, in Nelson, R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 3‐21.

Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 79‐91.

Silvestro, R. (1999), “Positioning services along the volume‐variety diagonal: the contingencies of service design, control and improvement”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19, pp. 399‐420.

Slack, N. (2001), “Exploring the trade‐off concept”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, pp. 949‐64.

Slack, N. and Lewis, M. (2002), Operations Strategy, Wiley, New York, NY.

Slack, N., Chambers, S., Harland, C., Harrison, A. and Johnston, R. (1999), Operations Management, Pitman Publishing, London.

Sturgeon, T. (1997), “Turnkey production networks: a new American model of industrial organization?”, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper 92 A.

Takeishi, A. and Fujimoto, T. (2003), “Modularization in the car industry: interlinked multiple hierarchies of product, production and supplier systems”, in Prencipe, A., Davies, A. and Hobday, M. (Eds), The Business of Systems Integration, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509‐33.

Verschuren, P. and Doorewaard, H. (1999), Designing a Research Project, LEMMA, Utrecht.

Warr, P.B. (1988), “An introduction to models in psychological research”, in Chapman, A.J. and Jones, D.M. (Eds), Models of Man, BPS, Leicester, pp. 289‐309.

Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, Harper Perennial, New york, NY.

Zysman, J. (2003), “Strategic asset or vulnerable commodity: manufacturing in a digital era”, Paper presented at the New Directions in Manufacturing, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Ferdows, K. (1997), “Making the most of foreign factories”, Harvard Business Review, March, pp. 73‐88.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

Tập 18 Số 8

949-965

Thông tin tác giả