The evaluation of climate policy: theory and emerging practice in Europe

Policy Sciences - Tập 44 Số 2 - Trang 179-198 - 2011
Dave Huitema1, Andrew Jordan2, Eric Massey1, Tim Rayner2, Harro van Asselt1, Constanze Haug1, Roger Hildingsson3, Suvi Monni4, Johannes Stripple3
1Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
3Dept. of Political Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Joint Research Centre - IES, European Union, Ispra, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abma, T., & In ‘t Veld, R. (Eds.) (2001). Handboek beleidswetenschap. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom Uitgevers.

Bailey, I., & Marsh, S. (2009). Facing up to the greenhouse challenge? Australian climate politics. In H. Compston & I. Bailey (Eds.) Turning down the heat (pp. 202–222). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.) (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Christie, C. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 7–35.

Coenen, F. H. J. M., Huitema, D., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (Eds.) (1998). Participation and the quality of environmental decision making. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 87–105.

Crabbé, A., & Leroy, P. (2008). The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. London, UK: Earthscan.

Derlien, H.-U., & Rist, R. C. (2002). Policy evaluation in international comparison. In J. E. Furubo, R. C. Rist, & R. Sandahl (Eds.) International atlas of evaluation (pp. 439–455). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. New York, USA: Basil Blackwell.

Dunn, W. (2004). Public policy analysis (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating public policy. Chicago, USA: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

Furubo, J. E., Rist, R. C., & Sandahl, R. (Eds.) (2002). International atlas of evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, USA: Sage Publications.

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London, UK: Sage.

Gupta, J., & Grubb, M. (Eds.) (2000). Climate change and european leadership: A sustainable role for Europe?. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Harris, P. G. (Ed.) (2007). Europe and global climate change: Politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Haug, C., & Huitema, D. (2009). Leren van een beleidsexercitie. De casus van het Europese milieubeleid. Bestuurskunde, 18(3), 36–46.

Haug, C., Huitema, D., & Wenzler, I. (forthcoming). Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.001 .

Haug, C., Rayner, T., Huitema, D., Massey. E., Monni, S., van Asselt, H., et al. (2008). What makes climate policies effective? Findings from a ‘meta analysis’ of recent policy evaluations. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM). Available at http://adamproject.info/index.php/Downloads/ .

Haug, C., Rayner, T., Jordan, A., Hildingsson, R., Stripple, J., Monni, S., et al. (2010). Navigating the dilemmas of climate policy in Europe: evidence from policy evaluation studies. Climatic Change, 101(3–4), 427–445.

Herrick, C., & Sarewitz, D. (2000). Ex post evaluation. A more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(3), 309–331.

Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (2001). Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. In M. Hisschemöller, W. Dunn, R. Hoppe, & J. Ravetz (Eds.) Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis. Policy Studies Review Annual, 12, 47–72.

Huitema, D., Jeliazkova, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Phases, levels and circles in policy development: The cases of higher education and environmental quality assurance. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 197–215.

Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (Eds.) (2009). Water policy entrepreneurs. A research companion to water transitions around the globe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance. Assessing adaptive management from a governance perspective. Ecology and Society, 4(1), 26 [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/ .

Huitema, D., Rayner, T., Massey, E., Haug, C., Hildingsson, R. Monni, S., et al. (2008). Climate policy evaluation across Europe. Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM). Available at http://adamproject.info/index.php/Downloads/ .

Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.) (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union. Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jordan, A. J., & Lenschow, A. (Eds.) (2008). Innovation in environmental policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Jordan, A. J., & Liefferink, D. (Eds.) (2004). Environmental policy in the European Union. London, UK: Routledge.

Jordan, A. J., Van Asselt, H., Berkhout, F., Huitema, D., & Rayner, T. (forthcoming). Climate change policy in the European Union: Understanding the paradoxes of multi-level governing. Global Environmental Politics, 11.

King, J. A. (2003). The challenge of studying evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 57–67.

Knaap, G. J., & Kim, T. J. (1998). Introduction: Environmental program evaluation. Framing the subject, identifying issues. In G. J. Knaap & T. J. Kim (Eds.) Environmental program evaluation. A primer (pp. 1–20). Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press.

Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2010). Public policy. Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Lehtonen, M. (2005). OECD environmental performance review programme. Accountability (f)or learning? Evaluation, 11, 169–188.

Lehtonen, M. (2006). Deliberative democracy, participation, and OECD peer reviews of environmental policies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 185–201.

Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., et al. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6), 1786–1793.

Martinuzzi, A. (2004). Sustainable development evaluations in Europe—market analysis, meta evaluation and future challenges. Journal of Environmental Assessment, Policy and Management, 6(4), 411–442.

Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments, context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9, 415–436.

Mickwitz, P., & Birnbaum, M. (2009). Key insights for the design of environmental evaluations. In M. Binbaum & P. Mickwitz (Eds.) Environmental program and policy evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 122, 105–112.

Moberg, F., & Galaz, V. (2005). Resilience: going from conventional to adaptive freshwater management for human and ecosystem compatibility. Stockholm: SIWA (Swedish Water House Policy Brief, No. 3).

Nilsson, M., Jordan, A., Turnpenny, J., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B., & Russel, D. (2008). The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: An analysis of three European countries and the European Union. Policy Sciences, 41, 335–355.

Owens, S., Rayner, T., & Bina, O. (2004). New agendas for appraisal: Reflections on theory, practice and research. Environment and Planning A, 36(11), 1943–1959.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 18, 354–365.

Paterson, M. (2009). Post-hegemonic climate politics? British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 11(1), 140–158.

Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence based policy: A realist perspective. London, UK: Sage.

Pielke, R. A. (2004). What future for the policy sciences? Policy Sciences, 37, 209–225.

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker. Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ridder, D., Mostert, E., & Wolters, H. A. (Eds.) (2005). Learning together to manage together. Improving participation in water management. Osnabrueck, Germany: University of Osnabrueck, USF.

Russel, D., Haxeltine, A., Huitema, D., & Nilsson, M. (2010). Climate change appraisal in the EU: Current trends and future challenges. In M. Hulme & H. Neufeldt (Eds.) Making climate change work for us (pp. 31–53). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.

Schreurs, M., & Tiberghien, Y. (2007). Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining EU leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19–46.

Stufflebeam, D. (2001). The meta evaluation imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 183–209.

Van de Graaf, H., & Hoppe, R. (1996). Beleid en politiek. Een inleiding tot de beleidswetenschap en de beleidskunde. Bussum, The Netherlands: Coutinho.

Vedung, E. (2005). Public policy and program evaluation (3rd ed.) New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers.

Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531–545.

Wollmann, H. (2007). Policy evaluation and evaluation research. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidnet (Eds.) Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 393–402). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.