The ethics of ‘public understanding of ethics’—why and how bioethics expertise should include public and patients’ voices

Bauer, M.W., N. Allum, and S. Miller. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79–95.

Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards an alternative modernity. Beverley Hills and London: Sage.

Benhabib, S., ed. 1996. Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ and Chichester: Princeton University Press.

Birnbacher, D. 1999. Ethics and social science: Which kind of co-operation? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2(4): 319–336.

Birnbacher, D. 2002. Wofür ist der “Ethik-Experte” experte? In Biomedizinische ethik: Aufgaben, methoden, selbstverständnis, ed. B. Gesang, 97–114. Paderborn: Mentis.

Bodmer, W. 1987. The public understanding of science. Science and Public Affairs 2: 69–90.

Bogner, A., and W. Menz. 2005. Bioethical controversies and policy advice: The production of ethical expertise and its role in the substantiation of political decision-making. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 24: 21–40.

Borry, P., P. Schotsmans, and K. Dierickx. 2005. The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics. Bioethics 19(1): 49–71.

Burgess, J., A. Stirling, J. Clark, G. Davies, M. Eames, K. Staley, and S. Williamson. 2007. Deliberative mapping: A novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science 16(3): 299–322.

Bybee, R.W., N. Harms, B. Ward, and R. Yager. 1980. Science, society, and science education. Science Education 64(3): 377–395.

Cooke, B., and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: The new tyranny?. London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.

Cowley, Ch. 2005. A new rejection of moral expertise. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 8(3): 273–279.

Daniels, N. 2003. Reflective equilibrium. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2003 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta, URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/davidson/ >. Accessed 28th April 2010.

Delkeskamp-Hayes, C. 2005. Societal consensus and the problem of consent: Refocusing the problem of ethics expertise in liberal democracies. In Ethics expertise. History, contemporary perspectives, and applications, ed. L. Rasmussen, 139–163. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Düwell, M. 2000. Die Bedeutung ethischer diskurse in einer wertepluralen welt. In Angewandte ethik als politikum, ed. M. Kettner, 76–114. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

Ericsson, A.K., N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman. 2006. Cambridge handbook on expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

European Commission. 2002. Science and Society Action Plan. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ss_ap_en.pdf . Accessed 28th April 2010.

Frank, A., and T. Jones. 2003. Bioethics and the later Foucault. Journal of Medical Humanities 24(3/4): 179–186.

Fox, R.C., J.P. Swazey, and J.C. Watkins. 2008. Observing bioethics. Oxford University Press: UK.

Gerhards, J., F. Neidhardt, and D. Rucht, eds. 1998. Zwischen palaver und diskurs. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Gerhards, J., and M.S. Schäfer. 2009. Two normative models of science in public. Human genome sequencing in German and US print media. Public Understanding of Science 18(4): 437–451.

Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Grauman, S. 2003. Die Rolle der Medien in der öffentlichen Debatte zur Biomedizin. In Kulturelle aspekte der biomedizin, ed. S. Schicktanz, Ch. Tannert, and P. Wiedemann, 212–243. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.

Habermas, J. 1990. Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In The communicative ethics controversy, ed. S. Benhabib and F. Dallmayr, 60–110. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Haimes, E. 2002. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations. Bioethics 16: 89–113.

Held, V. 2005. The ethics of care, personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Holm, S., and T. Takala. 2007. High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 1–4.

Irwin, A. 2006. The politics of talk. Coming to terms with the ‘New’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–320.

Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizens participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3): 323–344.

Jollimore, T. 2006. Impartiality, Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/impartiality/#CogImpImp . Acessed April 28th 2010.

Koch, T. 2006. Bioethics as ideology: Conditional and unconditional values. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31: 251–267.

Kuczewski, M.G. 2009. The common morality in communitarian thought: reflective consensus in public policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30(1): 45–54.

Lagerspetz, E. 2008. Ethical expertise in democratic societies. In Genetic democracy. Philosophical perspectives, ed. V. Launis and J. Räikkä, 21–29. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Lancet, 1997. Editorial. The Lancet 350(9082): 897.

Lengwiler, M. 2008. Participatory approaches in science and technology: Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Science, Technology and Human Values 33(2): 186–201.

Levitt, M. 2003. Public consultation in bioethics. What’s the point of asking the public when they have neither scientific nor ethical expertise? Health Care Analysis 11(1): 15–24.

Means, A. 2002. Narrative argumentation: Arguing with natives. Constellations 9(2): 221–245.

Miller, J.D. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science 7: 203–224.

Musschenga, A.W. 2005. Empirical Ethics, context sensitivity, and contextualism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30(5): 467–490.

Myshkja, B. 2007. Lay expertise: Why involve the public in biobank governance? Genetics, Society and Policy 3: 1–16.

Nobel, C.N. 1982. Ethics and experts. Hastings Center Report 12(3): 7–8.

Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. London: Polity Press.

President’s Council on Bioethics. 2001. Executive order 13237 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_register&docid=fr30no01-151.pdf . Accessed 28th April 2010.

Rasmussen, L., ed. 2005. Ethics expertise. History, contemporary perspectives, and applications. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Raz, A., and S. Schicktanz. 2009. Lay perceptions of genetic testing in Germany and Israel: The interplay of national culture and individual experience. New Genetics and Society 28(4): 401–414.

Reck, B. 2003. Between democracy and technocracy. The Role of Expertise for the European Parliament. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.

Royal Society of London. 1985. The public understanding of science. London: Royal Society.

Schicktanz, S. 2008. Politikberatung im Kontext der Medizin. In Politikberatung, ed. S. Bröchler and R. Schützeichel, 47–69. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius UTB.

Schicktanz, S. 2009. Zum Stellenwert von Betroffenheit, Öffentlichkeit und Deliberation im empirical turn der Medizinethik. Ethik in der Medizin 21(3): 223–234.

Schicktanz, S., and M. Schweda. 2009. “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure”: Exploring economic and moral subtexts of the “organ shortage” problem in public views on organ donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 473–476.

Schicktanz, S., M. Schweda, and M. Franzen. 2008. ‘In a completely different light’? – The role of ‘being affected’ for the epistemic perspectives and moral attitudes of patients, relatives and lay people. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11(1): 57–72.

Schicktanz, S., M. Schweda, and S. Wöhlke. 2010. Gender issues in living organ donation: Medical, social and ethical aspects. In Gender and medicine, ed. I. Klinge and C. Wiesemann, 33–55. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press.

Schweda, M., and S. Schicktanz. 2009. Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries. Social Science & Medicine 68(6): 1129–1136.

Schweda M., and S. Schicktanz. 2010. The public understanding of ethics and its relevance for bioethical reflection. In The public life of ethics, ed. L. Colombo and A. Vlasak, 67–76. Oxford: The Inter-Disciplinary Press.

Scofield, G. 1993. Ethics consultation: The least dangerous profession? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2(4): 417–426.

Scofield, G. 2008. Speaking of ethical expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18(4): 369–384.

Singer, P. 1979. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steinkamp, N.L., B. Gordijn, and H.A.M.J. ten Have. 2008. Debating ethical expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18(2): 173–192.

Sturgis, P., and N. Allum. 2004. Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55–74.

Tashakkori, A., and Ch. Taddlie. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, London, Delhi: Sage.

Toulmin, S. 1982. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 25(4): 736–750.

Weinstein, B.D. 1994. The possibility of ethical expertise. Theoretical Medicine 15: 61–75.

Williams, M. 1998. Voice, trust, and memory: Marginalized groups and the failings of liberal representation. Patricia: Princeton University Press.

Wynne, B. 1991. Knowledges in context. Science Technology and Human Values 16: 111–121.

Wynne, B. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1: 281–304.

Wynne, B. 1993. Public uptake of science: A case for institutional reflexivity. Public Understanding of Science 2: 321–338.

Wynne, B. 2006. Public engagement as means of restoring trust in science? Hitting the notes, but missing the music. Community Genetics 10(5): 211–220.

Yoder, S.D. 1998. The nature of ethical expertise. Hastings Center Report 28(6): 11–19.