The effects of treaty legality and domestic institutional hurdles on environmental treaty ratification
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456.
Bang, G., Hovi, J., & Sprinz, D. F. (2012). US presidents and the failure to ratify multilateral environmental agreements. Climate Policy, 12(6), 755–763.
Barrett, S. (1994). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 878–894.
Barrett, S. (1998). On the theory and diplomacy of environmental treaty-making. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 317–333.
Barrett, S. (2006). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, B., & Koubi, V. (2013a). Is there a democracy–civil society paradox in global environmental governance? Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 88–107.
Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2010). A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 509–538.
Bernauer, T., Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V., & Spilker, G. (2013b). Is there a depth versus participation’ dilemma in international cooperation? Review of International Organizations, 8(4), 477–497.
Beron, K. J., Murdoch, J. C., & Vijverberg, W. P. M. (2003). Why cooperate? Public goods, economic power, and the Montreal Protocol. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 286–297.
Böhmelt, T., & Pilster, U. H. (2010). International environmental regimes: Legalisation, flexibility and effectiveness. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 245–260.
Boockmann, B., & Thurner, P. W. (2006). Flexibility provisions in multilateral environmental treaties. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 6(2), 113–135.
Carter, D. B., & Signorino, C. S. (2010). Back to the future: Modeling time dependence with binary data. Political Analysis, 18(2), 271–292.
Center for International Earth Science and Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. (2005). Environmental Treaties and Resource Indicators (ENTRI) Query Service. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/entri/ .
Chinkin, C. M. (1989). The challenge of soft law: Development and change in international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 38(4), 850–866.
Cole, W. M. (2005). Sovereignty relinquished? Explaining commitment to the international human rights covenants, 1969–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 472–495.
Cole, W. M. (2009). Hard and soft commitments to human rights treaties, 1966–2000. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 563–588.
Congleton, R. (1992). Political institutions and pollution control. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(3), 412–421.
Downs, G. W., Rocke, D. M., & Barsoom, P. N. (1996). Is the good news about compliance good news for cooperation? International Organization, 52(3), 379–406.
Finus, M. (2001). Game theory and international environmental cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Gaston, N. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? Public Choice, 104(3–4), 345–368.
Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., & Ujhelyi, G. (2007). Kyoto Protocol cooperation: Does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? Public Choice, 133, 231–251.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Ujhelyi, G. (2006). Political institutions, interest groups, and the ratification of international environmental agreements. Working Paper. Houston, TX: Department of Economics: University of Houston.
Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), 712–724.
Goodliffe, J., & Hawkins, D. (2006). Explaining commitment: States and the convention against torture. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 358–371.
Guzman, A. T. (2002). The cost of credibility: Explaining resistance to interstate dispute resolution mechanisms. Journal of Legal Studies, XXXI, 303–326.
Guzman, A. T. (2005). The design of international agreements. The European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 579–612.
Hathaway, O. A. (2007). Why do countries commit to human rights treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 588–621.
Hathaway, O. A. (2008). Treaties’ end: The past, present and future of international lawmaking in the United States. The Yale Law Journal, 117(7), 1236–1372.
Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). Penn world table. (version 7.1), Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
Koremenos, B. (2001). Loosening the ties that bind: A learning model of agreement flexibility. International Organization, 55(2), 289–325.
Koremenos, B. (2005). Contracting around international uncertainty. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 549–565.
Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799.
Lipson, C. (1991). Why are some international agreements informal? International Organization, 45(4), 495–538.
Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002. http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm .
Martin, L. (2000). Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Milner, H. V. (1997). Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic politics and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milner, H. V., & Rosendorff, P. B. (1997). Democratic politics and international trade negotiations: Elections and divided government as constraints on trade liberalization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(1), 117–146.
Mitchell, R. B. (2002). International environmental agreements database project (version 2007.1). http://iea.uoregon.edu/ .
Neumayer, E. (2002a). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164.
Neumayer, E. (2002b). Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? World Economy, 25(6), 815–832.
Perrin, S., & Bernauer, T. (2010). International regime formation revisited: Explaining ratification behavior with respect to long range transboundary air pollution agreements. European Union Politics, 11(3), 405–426.
Pevehouse, J. C., Nordstrom, T., & Warnke, K. (2004). The COW-2 international organizations dataset version 2.0. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 21(2), 101–119.
Raustiala, K. (2005). Form and substance in international agreements. The American Journal of International Law, 99(3), 581–614.
Roberts, T. J., Park, B. C., & Vasquez, A. A. (2004). Who ratifies environmental treaties and why? Institutionalism, structuralism and participation by 192 nations in 22 treaties. Global Environmental Politics, 4(3), 22–64.
Rosendorff, P. B. (2005). Stability and rigidity: Politics and design of the WTO’s dispute settlement procedure. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 389–400.
Rosendorff, P. B., & Milner, H. V. (2001). The optimal design of international trade institutions: Uncertainty and escape. International Organization, 55(4), 829–857.
Simmons, B. A. (1993). Credibility, costs, and institutions: Cooperation on economic sanctions. World Politics, 45(3), 406–432.
Simmons, B. A. (2000). International law and state behavior: Commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs. American Political Science Review, 94(4), 819–835.
Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International law in domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, J. M. (2000). The politics of dispute settlement design: Explaining legalism in regional pacts. International Organization, 54(1), 137–180.
Subramanian, N., & Urpelainen, J. (2013). Addressing cross-border environmental displacement: When can international treaties help?. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10784-013-9233-2 .
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
von Stein, J. (2008). The international law and politics of climate change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 243–268.
Wangler, L., Altamirano-Cabrera, J.-C., & Weikard, H.-P. (2013). The political economy of international environmental agreements: A survey. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 13, 387–403.