The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Askell-Williams, H., Lawson, M., & Skrzypiec, G. (2012). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons. Instructional Science, 40, 413–443. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9182-5 .
Axelrod, M. I., & Zank, A. J. (2012). Increasing classroom compliance: Using a high-probability command sequence with noncompliant students. Journal of Behavioural Education, 21, 119–133.
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition—Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367–379. doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9 .
Bicard, D. F., Ervin, A., Bicard, S. C., & Baylot-Casey, L. (2012). Differential effects of seating arrangements on disruptive behaviour of fifth grade students during independent seatwork. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 45, 407–411.
Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007). The effect of class size on the teaching of pupils aged 7–11 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 18, 147–172. doi: 10.1080/09243450601058675 .
Bliss, J., Askew, M., & Macrae, S. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education, 22, 37–61. doi: 10.1080/0305498960220103 .
Boersma, A. M. E., Dam, G. ten, Volman, M., & Wardekker, W. (2009, April). Motivation through activity in a community of learners for vocational orientation. Paper presented at the AERA conference, San Diego
Brühwiler, C., & Blatchford, P. (2007). Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and Instruction, 21, 95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.004 .
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213%2801%2900044-1 .
Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 365–399. doi: 10.3102/00028312041002365 .
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychology Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 .
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35. doi: 10.2307/1170744 .
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., & Oser, R. L. (2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science, 30, 433–464. doi: 10.1023/A:1020516301541 .
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 265–272. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1 .
De Bruijn, E., Overmaat, M., Glaudé, M., Heemskerk, I., Leeman, J., Roeleveld, J., & van de Venne, J. (2005). Krachtige leeromgevingen in het middelbaar beroepsonderwijs: vormgeving en effecten [Results of powerful learning environments in vocational education]. Pedagogische Studiën, 82, 77–95.
Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 39–65. doi: 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028402.10122.ff .
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Educational communications and technology (pp. 170–199). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x .
Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Azevedo, R., Legowski, E., Reitmeyer, K., Tseytlin, E., & Crowley, R. (2013). Metacognitive scaffolds improve self-judgments of accuracy in a medical intelligent tutoring system. Instructional Science,. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9275-4 .
Fidalgo, Z., & Pereira, F. (2005). Socio-cultural differences and the adjustment of mothers’ speech to their children’s cognitive and language comprehension skills. Learning and Instruction, 15, 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.12.005 .
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059 .
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.3 .
Haladyna, T. M. (1999). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher–student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 1–14. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1 .
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539.
Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case study. Instructional Science, 39, 255–282. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9127-4 .
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 .
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routeledge.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research., 30, 411–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x .
Leat, D. (1998). Thinking through geography. Cambridge: Chris Kington Publishing.
Mattanah, J. F., Pratt, M. W., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Authoritative parenting, parental scaffolding of long-division mathematics, and children’s academic competence in fourth grade. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 85–106. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.10.007 .
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.
Mercer, N., & Fisher, E. (1992). How do teachers help children to learn? An analysis of teachers’ interventions in computer-based activities. Learning and Instruction, 2, 339–355. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(92)90022-E .
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking. A sociocultural approach. New York: Routledge.
Molenaar, I., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2011). Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement. Instructional Science, 39, 785–803. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9154-1 .
Murphy, N., & Messer, D. (2000). Differential benefits from scaffolding and children working alone. Educational Psychology, 20, 17–31. doi: 10.1080/014434100110353 .
Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2009). Regulation of teacher elicitations in the mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 91–120. doi: 10.1080/07370000902797304 .
Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 143–175.
Pino-Pasternak, D., Whitebread, D., & Tolmie, A. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of parent-child interactions during academic tasks and their relationships with children’s self-regulated learning. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 219–272. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2010.490494 .
Praetorius, A. K., Lenske, G., & Helmke, A. (2012). Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise? Learning and Instruction, 6, 387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.002 .
Pratt, M. W., & Savoy-Levine, K. M. (1998). Contingent tutoring of long-division skills in fourth and fifth graders: Experimental tests of some hypotheses about scaffolding. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 287–304. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)80041-0 .
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Etaläpelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, P. (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion?—Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project. Instructional Science, 31, 377–393. doi: 10.1023/A:1025700810376 .
Roehler, L. R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 6–42). Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Roll, I., Holmes, N. G., Day, J., & Bonn, D. (2012). Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in guided invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 691–710. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7 .
Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123–139. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003 .
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling metaanalytic results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499. doi: 10.3102/0034654307310317 .
Simons, C., & Klein, J. (2007). The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science, 35, 41–72. doi: 10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5 .
Slavin, R. E. (2008). What works? Issues in synthesizing educational programme evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37, 5–14. doi; 10.3102/0013189X08314117
Stoel, R. D., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Roeleveld, J. (2003). Relations between the development of school investment, self-confidence, and language achievement in elementary education: a multivariate latent growth curve approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 313–333. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(03)00017-7 .
Stone, C. A. (1998a). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344–364. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100404 .
Stone, C. A. (1998b). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 409–413. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100411 .
Van de Pol, J., & Elbers, E. (2013). Scaffolding student learning: A microanalysis of teacher-student interaction. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 2, 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.001 .
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–297. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 .
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21, 46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004 .
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Elbers, E., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Measuring scaffolding in teacher—small- group interactions. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences (pp. 151–188). Hauppage: Nova Science Publishers.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2014). Teacher scaffolding in small- group work – An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 600–650. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2013.805300 .
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society—the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wannarka, R., & Ruhl, K. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: a review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93.
Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 1–28. doi: 10.1348/000709908X380772 .
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2003). The development of students’ learning in peer-directed small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 361–428. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2104_2 .
Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63–119. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8 .
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological process: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1–22. doi: 10.1159/000272425 .
Wittwer, J., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Using a diagnosis-based approach to individualize instructional explanations in computer-mediated communication. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 9–23. doi: 10.1007/s10648-010-9118-7 .
Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2008). Why instructional explanations often do not work: A framework for understanding the effectiveness of instruction explanations. Educational Psychologist, 43, 49–64. doi: 10.1080/00461520701756420 .
Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x .
Wood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 181–191. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01454.x .
Wood, D., & Wood, H. (1996). Commentary: Contingency in tutoring and learning. Learning and Instruction, 6, 391–397. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(96)00023-0 .