The effects of multinational activities on the measurement of home bias

Journal of the Japanese and International Economies - Tập 22 - Trang 401-416 - 2008
Pascal L. Ghazalian1, W. Hartley Furtan2
1Center for Research on the Economics of Agri-food (CREA), 4424-D Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Laval University, Quebec City, PQ, Canada G1K 7P4
2Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, 1979, A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation, Amer. Econ. Rev., 69, 106 Anderson, 2003, Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, Amer. Econ. Rev., 93, 170, 10.1257/000282803321455214 Barba-Navaretti, 2004 Belderbos, 1998, Tariff jumping DFI and export substitution: Japanese electronics firms in Europe, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 16, 601, 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00027-1 Bergstrand, 1985, The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundation and empirical evidence, Rev. Econ. Statist., 67, 474, 10.2307/1925976 Bergstrand, 1989, The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade, Rev. Econ. Statist., 71, 143, 10.2307/1928061 Bergstrand, 1990, The Heckscher–Ohlin–Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade, Econ. J., 100, 1216, 10.2307/2233969 Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B., Schott, P., 2005. Importers, exporters and multinationals: A portrait of firms in the US that trade goods. Mimeo, Dartmouth College Blonigen, 2001, In search of substitution between foreign production and exports, J. Int. Econ., 53, 81, 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00066-0 Brainard, S.L., 1993. A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. Working paper 4583. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA Brainard, 1997, An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade, Amer. Econ. Rev., 87, 520 Chen, 2004, Intra-national versus international trade in the European Union: Why do national border matter?, J. Int. Econ., 63, 93, 10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00042-4 Clausing, 2000, Does multinational activity displace trade?, Econ. Inquiry, 38, 105, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00013.x Deardorff, A.V., 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? Working paper 5377. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA Evans, C.L., 2001a. Border effects and the availability of domestic products abroad. Staff report 127. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York Evans, C.L., 2001b. Home bias in trade: Location or foreign-ness? Staff report 128. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York Feenstra, 2002, Border effects and the gravity equation: Consistent methods for estimation, Scot. J. Polit. Economy, 49, 491, 10.1111/1467-9485.00244 Frankel, 1997 Haveman, J., Hummels, D., 2001. Alternative hypotheses and the volume of trade: The gravity equation and the extent of specialization. Working paper No. 2000-004. Centre for International Business Education and Research, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University Head, 2000, Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU, Weltwirtsch. Arch., 136, 285, 10.1007/BF02707689 Head, K., Mayer, T., 2002. Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Working paper 2002-01. Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales Head, 2001, Overseas investment and firm exports, Rev. Int. Econ., 9, 108, 10.1111/1467-9396.00267 Helliwell, 1996, Do national borders matter for Quebec trade?, Canadian J. Econ., 29, 507, 10.2307/136247 Helliwell, 1998 Helpman, 2004, Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms, Amer. Econ. Rev., 94, 300, 10.1257/000282804322970814 Hillberry, R., 1999. Explaining the “border effect”: What can we learn from disaggregated commodity flow data? Indiana University Graduate Student Working Paper Series 9802. Indiana University Hillberry, 2002, Aggregation bias, compositional change, and the border effect, Can. J. Econ., 35, 517, 10.1111/1540-5982.00143 Huang, 2007, Distance and trade: Disentangling unfamiliarity effects and transport cost effects, Europ. Econ. Rev., 51, 161, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.11.004 Hummels, D., 2001. Toward a geography of trade costs. Mimeo, Purdue University Markusen, 2002 McCallum, 1995, National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns, Amer. Econ. Rev., 85, 615 Nitsch, 2000, National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union, Can. J. Econ., 33, 1091, 10.1111/0008-4085.00055 Rauch, 2002, Ethnic Chinese Networks in International Trade, Rev. Econ. Statist., 84, 116, 10.1162/003465302317331955 Wei, S.-J., 1996. Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integration? Working paper 5531. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MA Wolf, 2000, Intranational home bias in trade, Rev. Econ. Statist., 82, 555, 10.1162/003465300559046