The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing

*Attali, 2004 *Chen, 1997 Chen, 2008, Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes, Language Learning and Technology, 12, 94 *Chodorow, 2010, The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment, Language Testing, 27, 419, 10.1177/0265532210364391 *Choi, 2010 *El Ebyary, 2010, The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work, International Journal of English Studies, 10, 121, 10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119231 *Elliot, 2004 *Foltz, 1999, The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology, Interactive Multimedia Educational Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1 *Franzke, 2005, Summary Street: Computer support for comprehension and writing, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 53, 10.2190/DH8F-QJWM-J457-FQVB *Frost, 2008 *Grimes, 2008 *Grimes, 2010, Utility in a fallible tool: A multi-site case study of automated writing evaluation, Journal of Technology, Language, and Assessment, 8, 1 *Kellogg, 2010, Does automated feedback help students learn to write?, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42, 173, 10.2190/EC.42.2.c Lai, 2010, Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: Peers or computer program, British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 432, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x *Riedel, 2006, Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of automated essay scoring in teacher education cases, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 267, 10.2190/U552-M54Q-5771-M677 *Rock, 2007 Scharber, 2008, Students’ experiences with an automated essay scorer, The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 7, 1 *Shermis, 2004 *Shermis, 2008 *Schroeder, 2008, The impact of criterion writing evaluation technology on criminal justice student writing skills, Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 432, 10.1080/10511250802476269 *Wang, 2012, A comparative study on the influence of automated evaluation system and teacher grading on students’ English writing, Procedia Engineering, 29, 993, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.077 *Warden, 2000, EFL business writing behavior in differing feedback environments, Language Learning, 50, 573, 10.1111/0023-8333.00141 Warden, 1995, Improving feedback while decreasing teacher burden in ROC ESL business English classes Anson, 2006, Can’t touch this: Reflections on the servitude of computers as readers. Machine scoring of student essays, 38 Biber, 2011 Burstein, 2004, Automated essay evaluation: The Criterion online writing service, AI Magazine (Fall), 27 Chandrasegaran, 2005, Essay assist: Developing software for writing skills improvement in partnership with students, RELC Journal, 36, 137, 10.1177/0033688205055567 Dikli, 2006, An overview of automated scoring of essays, The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5, 1 Faigley, 1981, Analyzing revision, College Composition and Communication, 32, 400, 10.2307/356602 Freitag Ericsson, 2006, The meaning of meaning Grimes, 2005 Herrington, 2001, What happens when machines read our students writing?, College English, 63, 480, 10.2307/378891 Hyland, 2006, Feedback on second language students’ writing, Language Teaching, 39, 83, 10.1017/S0261444806003399 Patterson, 2005, Computerized writing assessment: Technology gone wrong, Voices From the Middle, 13, 56 Philips, 2007 Schmidt, 1990, The role of consciousness in second language learning, Applied Linguistics, 11, 129, 10.1093/applin/11.2.129 2003 2013 Taylor, 2005 Truscott, 1996, The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes, Language Learning, 46, 327, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x Truscott, 1998, Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review, Second Language Research, 14, 103, 10.1191/026765898674803209 Warschauer, 2006, Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda, Language Teaching Research, 10, 1, 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa Whalen, 1995, L1 and L2 writers’ strategic and linguistic knowledge: A model of multiple-level discourse processing, Language Learning, 44, 381, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00447.x Yang, 2002, A review of strategies for validating computer-automated scoring, Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 391, 10.1207/S15324818AME1504_04 Zellermayer, 1991, Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner, American Educational Research Journal, 28, 373, 10.3102/00028312028002373 *Britt, 2004, Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students’ essays, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 359 Dikli, 2007 *Hoon, 2006 *Lee, 2009, Web-based essay critiquing system and EFL students’ writing: A quantitative and qualitative investigation, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 57, 10.1080/09588220802613807 *Matsumoto, 2008, Evaluation of the use of automated writing assessment software, 1827 *Schreiner, 2002 *Steinhart, 2001 Wade-Stein, 2004, Summary Street: Interactive computer support for writing, Cognition and Instruction, 22, 333, 10.1207/s1532690xci2203_3 Warschauer, 2008, Automated writing assessment in the classroom, Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3, 22, 10.1080/15544800701771580 Yao, 1996