The effectiveness of e-corporate governance: an exploratory study of internet voting at shareholders’ annual meetings in France

Corporate Governance (Bingley) - Tập 20 Số 4 - Trang 673-702 - 2020
Sonia Abdennadher1, Walid Cheffi2
1Higher Colleges of Technology, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
2United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates

Tóm tắt

Purpose E-corporate governance or the use of technologies and information systems (ISs) in corporate governance, is still a subject that is too seldom addressed in business research. This paper is at the intersection between two fields of research (corporate governance and the management of ISs), which are interdependent in ways that are still unexplored. The paper analyzes the implications of internet voting (IV) at shareholders’ annual meetings (SAM) for the corporate governance of listed companies in France, in particular for the relationship between executives and shareholders. Most of the studies that have dealt with IV at SAM have focused on techno-legal issues and were often conducted by business law researchers. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the implications of the new voting system through the prism of corporate governance. Design/methodology/approach The authors proceeded by triangulation of methods. This qualitative study is based on observations, interviews and documentary analysis. It assessed the IV implications for both the issuing companies and the shareholders. Findings The new voting system brings undeniable competitive advantage to the issuing company and facilitates shareholders’ activism, yet it has serious risks both for the corporations and for certain categories of the shareholder. Interestingly, the authors propose an original and field-grounded typology that distinguishes the risks and benefits associated with IV in relation to executives’ attitudes. Social implications The paper shows that the resolving of identified deficiencies with IV development could contribute to the alignment of companies’ interests with those of shareholders. Moreover, the study calls for policymakers to appoint an official body to regulate the practical implementation of the new system and to prevent its dissemination being held hostage to the executives’ willingness. Originality/value An original aspect of this research lies in the effective operationalization of the constructs of corporate governance effectiveness with a view to examining corporate governance as a set of technologically mediated practices. Moreover, this study emphasizes the key role of the construct of “executives’ willingness” in facilitating/impeding IV diffusion. This underlies their attempts to reverse the corporate governance relationship.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2008, An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: costs, contingencies, and complementarities, Organization Science, 19, 475, 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322

ANSA, 2005, The French national association of incorporated companies, ANSA report

2010, Exercising corporate governance at the annual general meeting, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10, 140, 10.1108/14720701011035666

2013, How do top managers support strategic information system projects and why do they sometimes withhold this support?, International Journal of Project Management, 31, 498, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.013

2004, Virtual shareholder meetings, Duke Law & Technology Review, 8, 1

2009, Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 27, 10.3316/QRJ0902027

1998, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development

Brav, A. Cain, M.D. and Zytnick, J. (2019), “Retail shareholder participation in the proxy process: monitoring, engagement, and voting”, Engagement and Voting, 15 May, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3387659

2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

2005, The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Information Systems Journal, 15, 5, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

2003, Bringing e-democracy back in: why it matters for future research in e-governance, Social Science Computer Review, 21, 443, 10.1177/0894439303256372

2013, Firms target retail investors for ‘say-on-Pay’ votes, Wall Street Journal

2017, Blockchain and the 21st century annual general meeting, European Company Law, 14, 167

2008, The evolution and continuing challenges of e-governance, Public Administration Review, 68, S86, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x

1992, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 3, 60, 10.1287/isre.3.1.60

2003, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9, 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

2009, Top management support of enterprise systems implementations, Journal of Information Technology, 24, 55, 10.1057/jit.2008.21

2011, Mobile corporate governance: a model proposal for modern corporate governance and investor relations, Bogazici Journal, 25, 171, 10.21773/boun.25.1.7

2009, Taking stock of corporate governance research while looking to the future, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 257, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00748.x

2017, Standing voting instructions: empowering the excluded retail investor, Minnesota Law Review, 102, 11

2017, Internet voting and turnout: evidence from Switzerland, Electoral Studies, 47, 1, 10.1016/j.electstud.2017.03.001

2016, A review of e-voting: the past, present and future, Annals of Telecommunications, 71, 279, 10.1007/s12243-016-0525-8

2002, Les dispositions du décret du 3 mai 2002 relatives aux assemblées générales d’actionnaires, 421

2008, The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 301, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250111

2015, Shareholder voting and merger returns, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 29, 337, 10.1007/s11408-015-0256-2

2016, The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: a dynamic capabilities approach, Journal of Business Research, 69, 3447, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.041

2017, Shielding or engaging: the use of online shareholder platforms in investor relations, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 22, 133, 10.1108/CCIJ-05-2016-0037

2014, Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: the perspectives of DeLone & McLean is success model and trust, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 234, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.065

2002, Investor relations in internet, Corporate Governance, 191, 10.1007/978-3-642-86010-2_10

2000, The internet will drive corporate monitoring, 4

2003, Democracy and infomediaries, Corporate Governance, 11, 91, 10.1111/1467-8683.00010

2005, The use of ICT in annual shareholder meetings and investor relations: an examination of the German stock market, Corporate Reputation Review, 8, 110, 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540243

1995, Essentials of Management Information Systems, 585

2019, Managerial reliance on the retail shareholder vote: evidence from proxy delivery methods, Management Science

2011, The willingness of e-government service adoption by business users: the role of offline service quality and trust in technology, Government Information Quarterly, 28, 222, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.007

2018, Vote avoidance and shareholder voting in mergers and acquisitions, The Review of Financial Studies, 31, 3176, 10.1093/rfs/hhy065

2016, Evasive shareholder meetings, Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 318, 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.001

2015, Cross-border voting chains and the case for improving the quality of shareholder engagement, International Journal of Corporate Governance, 6, 70, 10.1504/IJCG.2015.069770

2012, Shareholder rights, shareholder voting, and corporate performance, Journal of Management & Governance, 16, 171, 10.1007/s10997-010-9138-1

2005, An investigation of factors that influence senior executives to accept innovations in information technology, International Journal of Management, 22, 542

1995, Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use, Organization Science, 6, 423, 10.1287/orsc.6.4.423

2009, A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean is success model: an examination of is success at the individual level, Information & Management, 46, 159, 10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006

2008, Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships, European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236, 10.1057/ejis.2008.15

2011, The role of shareholder proposals in corporate governance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 167, 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.10.002

2012, The new European shareholder rights directive: removing barriers and creating opportunities for more shareholder activism and democracy, Journal of Management & Governance, 16, 269, 10.1007/s10997-010-9140-7

Saccone, F. (2010), “E-proxy reform, activism, and the decline in retail shareholder voting”, available at: www.conference-board.org/retrievefile.cfm?filename=DN-021-101.pdf&- type=subsite (accessed 15 April 2015).

2011, Changing the world through shareholder activism?, Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 5, 51

2017, Digital Transformation in Financial Services

1997, A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of is success, Information Systems Research, 8, 240, 10.1287/isre.8.3.240

1994, A partial test and development of the Delone and McLean model of is success, 99

2018, Stakeholders’ perspective on electronic initiatives in corporate governance, IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 17, 24

2003, The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation, MIS Quarterly, 533

2010, User participation in information systems security risk management, MIS Quarterly, 503

1990, Basics of Qualitative Research

2013, Corporate governance, cross-border voting and the securities law directive – enhancing investor engagement through standardization, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 2

2017, Understanding mobile banking individual performance: the DeLone & McLean model and the moderating effects of individual culture, Internet Research, 27, 538, 10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0117

2015, Shareholder meetings and corporate governance: with a focus on electronic provision of reference materials for shareholder meetings, Public Policy Review, 11, 451

2006, Corporate governance and innovation: the UK compared with the US and ‘insider’ economies, Research Policy, 35, 160, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.004

2004, Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: to greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 685, 10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.009

2011, Issuers & shareholders: information & proxy voting process in France

2006, Empowering small shareholders: a comparison of three instruments, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14

2019, Blockchain and smart contracting for the shareholder community, European Business Organization Law Review, 20, 111, 10.1007/s40804-019-00136-0

2007, The virtual shareholders meeting: how to make it work?, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 32

2016, The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 453, 10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.007

2004, Electronic government (e-government) and development, The European Journal of Development Research, 16, 417, 10.1080/0957881042000220886

2018, Social identity and trust in internet-based voting adoption, Government Information Quarterly, 35, 195, 10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007

2008, Top management support: mantra or necessity?, International Journal of Project Management, 26, 713, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.06.001

2010, Control of corporate decisions: shareholders vs management, Review of Financial Studies, 23, 23

2004, Analysing internet voting security, Communications of the Acm, 47, 59, 10.1145/1022594.1022624

2003, « Analyse Des Données Qualitatives: Recueil de Nouvelles Méthodes »

Norris, P. (2000), “The worldwide digital divide: information poverty, the internet and development”, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Studies Association of the UK, 10-13 April.

2012, Effects of activist shareholding on corporate social responsibility’ reporting practices: an empirical study in Spain, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 17, 7

Proxinvest (2012), “Rapport sur les assemblées générales des sociétés cotées en France (translation: report on the general meetings of listed companies in France)”, 16th report, Paris.

2001, Trust, risk, and shareholder decision making: an investor perspective on corporate governance, Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 177, 10.2307/3857876

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Corporate Governance (Bingley)

Tập 20 Số 4

673-702

Thông tin tác giả