The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice‐friendly review of four meta‐analyses
Tóm tắt
This article reviews the research support for Motivational interviewing (MI) so that practitioners can make informed decisions about the value and applicability of MI in their clinical work. We highlight the evidence from the three published meta‐analyses of MI and a recent meta‐analysis that we completed. MI is significantly (10%–20%) more effective than no treatment and generally equal to other viable treatments for a wide variety of problems ranging from substance use (alcohol, marijuana, tobacco, and other drugs) to reducing risky behaviors and increasing client engagement in treatment. Although most client‐related variables are unrelated to outcomes (e.g., age, gender, severity), some decisions about treatment format (e.g., individual vs. group) are important. For example, relying solely on group‐delivered MI appears to be less effective than one‐on‐one MI, whereas delivering MI with problem feedback is likely to generate better outcomes for some problems than MI alone. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol: In Session 65: 1–14, 2009.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arkowitz H., 2008, Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems, 145
Arkowitz H., 2008, Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems, 1
Arkowitz H., 2008, Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems
Aubrey L.L., 1998, Motivational interviewing with adolescents presenting for outpatient substance abuse treatment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Hettema J., 2005, Motivational Interviewing, 91
Lipsey M.W., 2001, Practical meta‐analysis
Lundahl B.W. Tollefson D. Kunz C. Brownell C. &Burke B.(in press).Meta‐analysis of Motivational interviewing: Twenty five years of research. Research on Social Work Practice.
Miller W.R.(2002). Motivational interviewing skill code (MISC) coder's manual. Retrieved [15 November2008] fromhttp://motivationalinterview.org/training/MISC2.pdf.
Miller W.R., 2002, Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change
Miller W.R., 1988, Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II, The drinker's check‐up as a preventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 16, 251
Miller W.R., 1992, Motivational enhancement therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence
Norcross J.C., 2002, Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients
Prochaska J.O., 2007, Systems of psychotherapy: A Transtheoretical approach
Rogers C.R., 1980, A way of being
Rosenthal R., 2000, Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach
Spielberger C.D., 1988, Manual for the State‐Trait Anger Expression Scale (STAX)
Westra H.A. Arkowitz H. &Dozois D.J.A.(2008). Motivational Interviewing as a pretreatment to CBT for generalized anxiety disorder: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies Orlandoeditor.