The effect of spatial interdependencies on prioritization and payments for environmental services

Land Use Policy - Tập 48 - Trang 341-350 - 2015
Joshua M. Duke1, Steven J. Dundas1, Robert J. Johnston2, Kent D. Messer1
1Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, 213 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716, USA
2George Perkins Marsh Institute and Department of Economics, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610-1477, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahern, 1991, Planning for an extensive open space system: linking landscape structure and function, Landscape Urban Plan, 21, 131, 10.1016/0169-2046(91)90037-M Albers, 1996, Modeling ecological constraints on tropical forest management: spatial interdependence, irreversibility, and uncertainty, J. Envion. Econ. Manage., 30, 73, 10.1006/jeem.1996.0006 Anderson, 1979, A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation, Am. Econ. Rev., 69, 106 Anderson, 2003, Gravity with Gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle, Am. Econ. Rev., 93, 170, 10.1257/000282803321455214 Ando, 1998, Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation, Science, 279, 2126, 10.1126/science.279.5359.2126 Arnold, 2013, Adverse selection in reverse auctions for environmental services, Land Econ., 89, 387, 10.3368/le.89.3.387 Babcock, 1997, Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities, Land Econ., 73, 325, 10.2307/3147171 Banerjee, 2012, Agglomeration bonus in small and large local networks: a laboratory examination of spatial coordination, Ecol. Econ., 84, 142, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.005 Banerjee, 2013, The impact of information provision on agglomeration bonus performance: an experimental study on local networks Bateman, 2006, The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP, Ecol. Econ., 60, 450, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003 Bateman, 2009, Bringing the real world into economic analyses of land use value: incorporation spatial complexity, Land Use Policy, 26S, S30, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.010 Bergstrom, 2009, What have we learned from over 20 years of farmland amenity valuation research in North America, Rev. Agric. Econ., 31, 21, 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.01424.x Bohara, 2001, Addressing negative willingness to pay in dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 20, 173, 10.1023/A:1012642902910 Bolitzer, 2000, The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon, J. Environ. Manage., 59, 185, 10.1006/jema.2000.0351 Borchers, 2012, Capitalization and proximity to agricultural and natural lands: evidence from Delaware, J. Environ. Manage., 99, 110, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.011 Breffle, 1998, Using contingent valuation to estimate a neighbourhood’s willingness to pay to preserve undeveloped urban land, Urban Stud., 35, 715, 10.1080/0042098984718 Brouwer, 2010, Spatial preference heterogeneity: a choice experiment, Land Econ., 86, 552, 10.3368/le.86.3.552 Bucholtz, 2010, An empirical analysis of a ‘smart subsidy’ Campbell, 2009, Using choice experiments to explore spatial distribution of willingness to pay for rural landscape improvement, Environ. Plann. A, 41, 97, 10.1068/a4038 Cummings, 1994, Substitution effects in CVM values, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 76, 205, 10.2307/1243622 Davis, 2006, Efficient conservation in a utility-maximization framework, Ecol. Soc., 11, 10.5751/ES-01591-110133 Drechsler, 2010, An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes, Resour. Energy Econ., 32, 261, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.015 Duke, 2014, Prioritizing payment for environmental services: using nonmarket benefits and costs for optimal selection, Ecol. Econ., 105, 319, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.014 Duke, 2012, Sustainable agricultural management contracts: using choice experiments to estimate the benefits of land preservation and conservation practices, Ecol. Econ., 74, 95, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.002 Duke, 2010, Multifunctionality and land use policy: an application of non-market valuation to urban fringe farm and forest preservation, 124 Fooks, J., Higgins, N., Messer, K.D., Duke, J.M., Hellerstein, D., Lynch, L., Conserving spatially explicit benefits in ecosystem service markets: lab and artefactual field tests of network bonuses and spatial targeting. Am. J. Agric. Econ, (forthcoming). Gallo, 1980, Quadratic knapsack problems, Math. Programm., 12, 132 Gardner, 1977, The economics of agricultural land preservation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 59, 1027, 10.2307/1239883 Geoghegan, 2002, The value of open spaces in residential land use, Land Use Policy, 19, 91, 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00040-0 Geoghegan, 2003, Capitalization of open spaces into housing values and the residential property tax revenue impacts of agricultural easement programs, Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev., 32, 33, 10.1017/S1068280500002483 Hanley, 2003, Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values, J. Environ. Manage., 68, 297, 10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00084-7 Hoehn, 1991, Valuing the multidimensional impacts of environmental policy: theory and methods, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 73, 289, 10.2307/1242713 Hoehn, 1993, Substitution effects in the valuation of multiple environmental programs, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 25, 56, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1026 Hoehn, 1989, Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test, Am. Econ. Rev., 79, 544 Holland, 2014, Spatially-referenced choice experiments: tests of individualized geocoding in stated preference questionnaires Holland, 2010 Hynes, 2010, A combinatorial optimization approach to nonmarket environmental benefit aggregation via simulated populations, Land Econ., 86, 345, 10.3368/le.86.2.345 Johnston, 2014, Modeling spatial patchiness and hot spots in stated preference willingness to pay, Environ. Resour. Econ., 59, 363, 10.1007/s10640-013-9731-2 Johnston, 2002, Spatial factors and stated preference values for public goods: considerations for rural land use, Land Econ., 78, 481, 10.2307/3146848 Johnston, 2002, Designing multidimensional environmental programs: assessing tradeoffs and substitution in watershed management plans, Water Resour. Res., 38, 1099, 10.1029/2001WR000521 Johnston, 2014, Connecting ecosystem services to land use: implications for valuation and policy, 196 Johnston, 2007, Willingness to pay for agricultural land preservation and policy process attributes: does the method matter, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 89, 1098, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01029.x Johnston, 2008, Benefit transfer equivalence tests with nonnormal distributions, Environ. Resour. Econ., 41, 1, 10.1007/s10640-007-9172-x Johnston, 2009, Willingness to pay for land preservation across states and jurisdictional scale: implications for benefit transfer, Land Econ., 85, 217, 10.3368/le.85.2.217 Johnston, 2009, Informing preservation of multifunctional agriculture when primary research is unavailable: An application of meta-analysis, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 91, 1353, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01347.x Johnston, 2010, Socioeconomic adjustments and choice experiment benefit function transfer: evaluation the common wisdom, Resour. Energy Econ., 32, 421, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.11.003 Jørgensen, 2013, Spatially induced disparities in users’ and non-users’ WTP for water quality improvements–testing the effect of multiple substitutes and distance decay, Ecol. Econ., 92, 58, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.015 Knight, 2009, Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land, Conserv. Biol., 24, 1348, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01494.x Kroeger, 2007, An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem service on agricultural lands, Ecol. Econ., 64, 321, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.021 Lewis, 2009, Targeting incentives to reduce habitat fragmentation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 91, 1080, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01310.x Lynch, 2006, Critical mass: does the number of productive farmland acres or farms affect farmland loss?, 119 Margules, 2000, Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 243, 10.1038/35012251 Messer, 2010, Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware, Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev., 39, 442, 10.1017/S1068280500007437 Neumann, 2009, Property price effects of a national wildlife refuge: Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Massachusetts, Land Use Policy, 26, 1101, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.008 Newburn, 2005, Economics of land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation, Conserv. Biol., 19, 1411, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00199.x Newburn, 2006, Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: targeting strategies for land conservation, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 88, 28, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00837.x Parkhurst, 2002, Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation, Ecol. Econ., 41, 305, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00036-8 Parkhurst, 2007, Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat, Econ. Ecol., 63, 344, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.009 Pfaff, 2004, Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning: a conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica, Resour. Energy Econ., 26, 237, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.009 Pisinger, 2007, The quadratic knapsack problem – a survey, Discrete Appl. Math., 155, 623, 10.1016/j.dam.2006.08.007 Polasky, 2008, Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns, Biol. Conserv., 141, 1505, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022 Quandt, 1965, Some perspectives of gravity models Rodrigue, 2009 Rolfe, 2012, Distance decay functions for iconic assets: assessing national values to protect the health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia, Environ. Res. Econ., 53, 347, 10.1007/s10640-012-9565-3 Schaafsma, 2012, Directional heterogeneity in WTP models for environmental valuation, Ecol. Econ., 79, 21, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.013 Sieg, 2004, Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large changes in spatially delineated public goods, Int. Econ. Rev., 45, 1047, 10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00297.x Stoms, 2009, Strategic targeting of agricultural conservation easements as a growth management tool, Land Use Policy, 26, 1149, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.004 Stoms, 2011, The power of information for targeting cost-effective conservation investments in multifunctional lands, Environ. Modell. Software, 26, 8, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.008 Swallow, 1993, Spatial interactions in multiple-use forests and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 25, 103, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1036 Tait, 2012, Nonmarket valuation of water quality: addressing spatially heterogeneous preferences using GIS and a random parameter logit model, Ecol. Econ., 75, 15, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.009 Walsh, 2007, Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium, J. Urban Econ., 61, 319, 10.1016/j.jue.2006.09.002