The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on foot-ankle biomechanics and relative foot stiffness perception in people with transtibial amputation

Clinical Biomechanics - Tập 80 - Trang 105141 - 2020
Elizabeth G. Halsne1,2, Joseph M. Czerniecki1,2, Jane B. Shofer1, David C. Morgenroth1,2
1Center for Limb Loss and MoBility VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA
2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356490, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamczyk, 2006, The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking, J. Exp. Biol., 209, 3953, 10.1242/jeb.02455 Adamczyk, 2017, Sensitivity of biomechanical outcomes to independent variations of hindfoot and forefoot stiffness in foot prostheses, Hum. Mov. Sci., 54, 154, 10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.005 Bowker, 1992 ClinicalTrials.gov, 2020 Curtze, 2009, Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet, J. Biomech., 42, 1746, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.009 Fey, 2011, The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees, Clin. Biomech., 26, 1025, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.06.007 Gailey, 2012, Application of self-report and performance-based outcome measures to determine functional differences between four categories of prosthetic feet, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 49, 597, 10.1682/JRRD.2011.04.0077 Gardiner, 2016, transtibial amputee gait efficiency: energy storage and return versus solid ankle cushioned heel prosthetic feet, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 53, 1133, 10.1682/JRRD.2015.04.0066 Geil, 2000, Comparison of methods for the calculation of energy storage and return in a dynamic elastic response prosthesis, J. Biomech., 33, 1745, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00102-0 Hafner, 2002, Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis?, Clin. Biomech., 17, 325, 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00020-7 Hansen, 2010, Investigations of roll-over shape: implications for design, alignment, and evaluation of ankle-foot prostheses and orthoses, Disabil. Rehabil., 32, 2201, 10.3109/09638288.2010.502586 Hansen, 2000, Prosthetic foot roll-over shapes with implications for alignment of trans-tibial prostheses, Prosthetics Orthot. Int., 24, 205, 10.1080/03093640008726549 Hansen, 2004, Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed, Clin. Biomech., 19, 407, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.12.001 Hansen, 2004, The human ankle during walking: implications for design of biomimetic ankle prostheses, J. Biomech., 37, 1467, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.017 Hansen, 2006, The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users, Prosthetics Orthot. Int., 30, 286, 10.1080/03093640600816982 Hothorn, 2008, Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical journal, Biom. Z., 50, 346 Houdijk, 2009, The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking, Gait Posture, 30, 35, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.009 Klodd, 2010, Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on gait of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 47, 899, 10.1682/JRRD.2009.10.0166 Klodd, 2010, Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on oxygen cost and subjective preference rankings of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 47, 543, 10.1682/JRRD.2010.01.0003 Lenth, 2019 Major, 2014, The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on ankle and knee kinematics, prosthetic limb loading, and net metabolic cost of trans-tibial amputee gait, Clin. Biomech., 29, 98, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.012 Morgan, 2018, Laboratory- and community-based health outcomes in people with transtibial amputation using crossover and energy-storing prosthetic feet: a randomized crossover trial, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0189652 Postema, 1997, Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part 1: biomechanical analysis related to user benefits, Prosthetics Orthot. Int., 21, 17, 10.3109/03093649709164526 Prince, 1994, A new technique for the calculation of the energy stored, dissipated, and recovered in different ankle-foot prostheses, IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., 2, 247, 10.1109/86.340873 Raschke, 2015, Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing, J. Biomech., 48, 146, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.002 Robertson, 1980, Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking, J. Biomech., 13, 845, 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90172-4 Roerdink, 2012, Evaluating asymmetry in prosthetic gait with step-length asymmetry alone is flawed, Gait Posture, 35, 446, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.005 Shepherd, 2018, Amputee perception of prosthetic ankle stiffness during locomotion, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 15, 99, 10.1186/s12984-018-0432-5 Team, 2018, R: A language and environment for statistical computing van der Linde, 2004, A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 41, 555, 10.1682/JRRD.2003.06.0102 Ventura, 2011, The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking, Gait Posture, 33, 220, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.009 Wickham, 2019 Wurdeman, 2017, Step activity and 6-minute walk test outcomes when wearing low-activity or high-activity prosthetic feet, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 96, 294, 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000607 Zhang, 2019, Evaluation of gait variable change over time as transtibial amputees adapt to a new prosthesis foot, Biomed. Res. Int., 2019, 6