The effect of non-linear competitive interactions on quantifying niche and fitness differences
Tóm tắt
The niche and fitness differences of modern coexistence theory separate mechanisms into stabilizing and equalizing components. Although this decomposition can help us predict and understand species coexistence, the extent to which mechanistic inference is sensitive to the method used to partition niche and fitness differences remains unclear. We apply two alternative methods to assess niche and fitness differences to four well-known community models. We show that because standard methods based on linear approximations do not capture the full community dynamics, they can sometimes lead to incorrect predictions of coexistence and misleading interpretations of stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms. Specifically, they fail when both species occupy the same niche or in the presence of positive frequency dependence. Conversely, a more recently developed method to decompose niche and fitness differences, which accounts for the full non-linear dynamics of competition, consistently identifies the correct contribution of stabilizing and equalizing components. This approach further reveals that when the true complexity of the system is taken into account, essentially all mechanisms comprise both stabilizing and equalizing components and that local maxima and minima of stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms exist. Amidst growing interest in the role of non-additive and higher order interactions in regulating species coexistence, we propose that the effective decomposition of niche and fitness differences will become increasingly reliant on methods that account for the inherent non-linearity of community dynamics.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adler PB, HilleRislambers J, Levine JM (2007) A niche for neutrality. Ecol Lett 10:95–104
Bairey E, Kelsic ED, Kishony R (2016) High-order species interactions shape ecosystem diversity. Nat Commun 7:1–7
Barabas G, D’Andrea R, Stump SM (2018) Chesson’s coexistence theory. Ecol Monogr 88:277–303
Buche L, Spaak JW, Jarillo J, De Laender F (2022) Niche differences, not fitness differences, explain predicted coexistence across ecological groups. J Ecol 110:2785–2796
Carmel Y, Cornell SJ, Belmaker J, Suprunenko YF, Kent R, Kunin WE, Bar-Massada A (2017) Using exclusion rate to unify niche and neutral perspectives on coexistence. Oikos 126:1451–1458
Carroll IT, Cardinale BJ, Nisbet RM (2011) Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. Ecology 92:1157–1165
Chesson P (1990) MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. Theor Popul Biol 37:26–38
Chesson P (1994) Multispecies Competition in Variable Environments. Theor Popul Biol 45:227–276
Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Evol Syst Annu Rev Ecol p. 31
Chesson P (2013) Species Competition and Predation. Ecological Systems. Springer, New York, pp 223–256
Chesson P (2018) Updates on mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. J Ecol 106:1773–1794
Chesson P, Kuang JJ (2008) The interaction between predation and competition. Nature 456:235–238
Godoy O, Bartomeus I, Rohr RP, Saavedra S (2018) Towards the Integration of Niche and Network Theories
Godoy O, Levine JM (2014) Phenology effects on invasion success: Insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. Ecology 95:726–736
Godoy O, Kraft NJ, Levine JM (2014) Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. Ecol Lett 17:836–844
Godwin CM, Chang FH, Cardinale BJ (2020) An empiricist’s guide to modern coexistence theory for competitive communities. Oikos
Grilli J, Barabas G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S (2017) Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature 548:210–213
Holt R, Grover J, Tilman D (1994) Simple Rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771
Johnson CA (2021) How mutualisms influence the coexistence of competing species. Ecology
Ke PJ, Letten AD (2018) Coexistence theory and the frequency-dependence of priority effects. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2:1691–1695
Letten AD, Stouffer DB (2019) The mechanistic basis for higher-order interactions and non-additivity in competitive communities. Ecol Lett 22:423–436
Letten AD, Ke PJ, Fukami T (2017) Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory. Ecol Monogr 87:161–177
Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S (2017) Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546:56–64
Mayfield MM, Stouffer DB (2017) Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1:1–7
Meszena G, Gyllenberg M, Pasztor L, Metz JA (2006) Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: A unified theory. Theor Popul Biol 69:68–87
Mordecai EA (2011) Pathogen impacts on plant communities: unifying theory, concepts, and empirical work. Ecol Monogr 81:429–441
Pande J, Fung T, Chisholm R, Shnerb NM (2019) Mean growth rate when rare is not a reliable metric for persistence of species. Ecol Lett 23:274–282
Petry WK, Kandlikar GS, Kraft NJ, Godoy O, Levine JM (2018) A competition-defence trade-off both promotes and weakens coexistence in an annual plant community. J Ecol 106:1806–1818
Saavedra S, Rohr RP, Bascompte J, Godoy O, Kraft NJ, Levine JM (2017) A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. Ecol Monogr 87:470–486
Singh P, Baruah G (2019). Higher order interactions and coexistence theory. Theo Ecol
Song C, Barabas G, Saavedra S (2019) On the consequences of the interdependence of stabilizing and equalizing mechanisms. The American Naturalist pp. 000-000
Song C, Saavedra S (2020) Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: An environment-dependent approach. PLoS Comput Biol 16
Spaak JW, Adler PB, Ellner SP (2022a) Modeling phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions: opportunities for species richness and challenges for modern coexistence theory. bioRxiv
Spaak JW, De Laender F (2020) Intuitive and broadly applicable definitions of niche and fitness differences. Ecol Lett https://doi.org/10.1101/482703
Spaak JW, Carpentier C, De Laender F (2021) Species richness increases fitness differences, but does not affect niche differences. Ecol Lett 24:2611–2623
Spaak JW, Godoy O, De Laender F (2021) Mapping species niche and fitness differences for communities with multiple interaction types. Oikos 130:2065–2077
Spaak JW, Ke PJ, Letten AD, DeLaender F (2022b) Different measures of niche and fitness differences tell different tales. Oikos p. e09573
Striebel M, Behl S, Diehl S, Stibor H (2009) Spectral Niche Complementarity and Carbon Dynamics in Pelagic Ecosystems. Am Nat 174:141–147
Tilman GD (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press
Zhao L, Zhang QG, Zhang DY (2016) Evolution alters ecological mechanisms of coexistence in experimental microcosms. Funct Ecol 30:1440–1446