The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties

Gerodontology - Tập 23 Số 1 - Trang 23-32 - 2006
Vassiliki Anastassiadou1, Martlesham Heath2
1Dental School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
2Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Turner Street, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Objectives:  The development of a measure, with complimentary normative and perceived needs, for the investigation of functional impairment of individual patients and the investigation of the physical causative bases of impairment.

Subjects:  A consecutive sample of 119 complete denture (CD) wearers attending a Greek department of prosthetic dentistry took part in the study. All subjects presented with some complaint(s) of their dentures.

Method:  Functional assessment of dentures (FAD) criteria and structured questionnaires were used covering denture satisfaction (DS) and food difficulties with CDs. The questions used a five‐point Likert scale.

Results:  The results showed that there were statistically significant associations between satisfaction from dentures and eating specified foods. Statistically significant associations were also found between denture qualities and movement of upper dentures and difficulty eating specified foods, but not with an open question on the difficulty of eating unspecified foods.

Conclusions:  This study successfully validated a suitable model for the combined evaluation of denture quality with clear diagnostic criteria and closed questions on DS and perceived difficulties when eating specified foods. This could predict the need for treatment, monitor the impact of care and provide a feasible measure to meet the need of everyday clinical situations.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kelly M, 2000, Adult Dental Health Survey

10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140206.x

World Health Organization, 1980, International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00050.x

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb02084.x

10.1177/00220345950740071301

10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80092-4

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00104.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1996.tb00158.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1996.tb00157.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1996.tb00159.x

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52168.x

10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70062-3

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1999.00085.x

10.1002/j.0022-0337.1993.57.12.tb02821.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1999.00059.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2001.00051.x

10.1186/1477-7525-1-40

10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00169.x

10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01191.x

10.1093/gerona/58.10.M948

Yoshida M, 2001, Correlation between quality of life and denture satisfaction in elderly complete denture wearers, Int J Prosthodont, 14, 77

10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70008-8

Appolonio I, 1997, Dental status, quality of life and mortality in an older community population: a multivariate approach, J Am Geriatr Soc., 45, 1315, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02930.x

10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01169.x

Heath MR., 1982, The effect of maximum biting force and bone loss upon masticatory function and dietary selection of the elderly, Int Dent J, 32, 345

Strassburger C, 2004, Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part I‐Characteristics of the studies, Int J Prosthodont, 17, 83

10.1016/0022-3913(90)90202-N

10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00016-7

10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.007

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00041.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00046.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00048.x

MillwoodJ.Food choices by complete denture wearers; development of potential outcome measures criteria. London:University of London 1997.MSc Thesis.

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00038.x

Allen PF, 2003, A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures, J. Can. Dent. Assoc, 69, 662

10.1038/sj.bdj.4809551

10.1016/0022-3913(86)90074-0

10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90546-6

10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00510.x

10.1111/j.1532-849X.1996.tb00279.x

10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.d01-286.x

Ware JE, 1992, The MOS 36 item short form health survey (SF 36) I, Conceptual Framework and Item Selection, 30, 473

10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00887.x

10.1177/00220345990780020301

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2000.00025.x

10.1001/jama.1995.03520250075037

10.1111/j.1741-2358.1994.tb00116.x

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00028.x