The effect of basic robotic coding in-service training on teachers’ acceptance of technology, self-development, and computational thinking skills in technology use

Alpan, G. (2008). Visual literacy and instructional technology. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 5(2), 74–102.

Alper, A., & Gülbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of recent research. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124–135.

Arslan, H., & Şahin, İ. (2013). Information technology teachers’ opinions about in-service training courses. Middle Eastern and African Journal of Educational Research, 56(5), 56–66.

Aytaç, T. (2000). Hizmet içi eğitim kavramı ve uygulamada karşılaşılan sorunlar, [In-service training concept and problems encountered in practice]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147, 66–69.

Ayvacı, H. S., Bakırcı, H., & Yıldız, M. (2014a). Science and technology teachers’ views and expectations about in-service training practices. Amasya Education Journal, 3(2), 357–383.

Ayvacı, H. Ş, Bakırcı, H., & Başak, M. H. (2014b). The evaluation of problems emerging during the implementation process of faith project by administrators, teachers and students. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 11(1), 20–46.

Baki, A. (2002). Bilgisayar Destekli Matematik [Computer supported mathematics] [Computer supported mathematics] (1st ed.). İstanbul: Ceren Yayın Dağıtım.

Balcı, H., Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., & Uğur-Erdoğmuş, F. (2018). Attitudes of game development activities in visual programming environments to students’ programming attitudes and the effect of students on self-efficacy perceptions for coding. In International symposium on contemporary education and social sciences, November 22–25, 2018, Antalya Turkey.

Baran, E. (2016). Öğretim teknolojilerinde yeni eğilimler ve yaklaşımlar [New trends and approaches in instructional technology]. In K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds), Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri (s.757–770). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Başaran, İ. E. (1994). Türkiye eğitim sistemi [The education system in Turkey]. Ankara.

Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–547.

Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.

Blaschke, L. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71.

Boom, K. D., Bower, M., Aruel, A., Siemon, J., & Scholkmann, A. (2018). Relationship between computational thinking and a measure of intelligence as a general problem-solving ability. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education, July 2018 (pp. 206–211). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197104.

Boydak, M. (1995). İngiltere’deki hizmetiçi eğitim uygulamaları [In-service training practices in the UK]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,, 7(1–2), 29–35.

Bozkurt, A. (2015). Sosyal ağlar ve yaşam boyu öğrenme deneyimi [Social networks and lifelong learning experience]. In Akademik Bilişim 2015 (s.113–118). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.

Bozkuş, F., Kablan, Z., Pak, K., Özdişçi, S., Özdemir, A., Aydın, M., & Boğazlıyan, D. (2017). The opinions of participants about the lesson study. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(28), 141–160.

Budak, Y., & Demirel, Ö. (2003). In-service training needs for teachers. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 9(1), 62–81.

Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1(2), 67–69.

Büyüköztürk, Ş, Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş, & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Scientific research methods] [Scientific research methods] (1st ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Caffarella, E. P. (1999). The major themes and trends in doctorial dissertation research in educational technology from 1977 through 1998. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 25, 14–25.

Cuban, L. (2001). Over sold and under used: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

Çatlak, Ş., Tekdal, M., & Baz, F. Ç. (2015). The status of teaching programming with scratch: A document review work. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education, 4(3), 13–25.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

Demiraslan, Y., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2005). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin öğrenme-öğretme sürecine entegrasyonunda öğretmenlerin durumu [The situation of teachers in integration of information and communication technologies to the learning–teaching process]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 109–113.

Demircioğlu, G., & Yadigaroğlu M. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme-öğretme ortamlarında bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri [Prospective teachers’ views on the use of information and communication technologies in learning–teaching environments]. In 2nd International conference on new trends in education and their implications, Antalya, Turkey.

Demirtaş, Z. (2010). AS a tool for training teacher in service, supervision. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 9(31), 41–52.

Döğer, M. F. (2016). Bilgisayar Destekli Eğitimlere Katılan Öğretmenlerin Görüş ve Deneyimlerine Bağlı Olarak Eğitimde Teknoloji Kullanımını Etkileyen Dinamikler [Dynamics effecting the usage of technology in education depending on the opinions and experiences of the teachers attending computer supported educations]. Unpublished Master Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.

EBA. (2017). EBA hakkında tanıtım [Introduction about EBA]. http://www.eba.gov.tr/hakkimizda.

Erdoğmuş, F., & Çağıltay, K. (2009). Türkiye’de eğitim teknolojileri alanında yapılan master ve doktora tezlerinde genel eğilimler. In Akademik Bilişim 2009 Konferansı’nda sunulan bildiri. Şanlıurfa: Harran Üniversitesi.

Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–39.

Fouts, J. T. (2000). Research on computers and education: Past, present and future (prepared for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation). Seattle, WA: Seattle Pacific University. http://www.portical.org/fouts.pdf.

Garuba, A. (2004). Continuing education: An essential tool for teacher empowerment in an era of universal basic education in Nigeria. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(2), 191–203.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Gökdere, M., & Çepni, S. (2003). Üstün yetenekli çocuklara verilen değerler eğitiminde öğretmenin rolü [The role of the teacher in the education of values given to gifted children]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(2), 93–103.

Göktaş, Y., Küçük, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacık, Ö., Yıldırım, G., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2012). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000–2009 decade. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 177–199.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

Gülbahar, Y., & Alper, A. (2009). A content analysis of the studies in instructional technologies area. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 42(2), 93–111.

Gültekin, M., Aktay, E. G., & Gültekin, I. (2018). In-service training (seminar) period implementations in primary education. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 8(2), 482–513.

Gürpınar, E., & Zayim, N. (2008). Medical education and e-Learning. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 19–25.

Hamilton, M. L., & Richardson, V. (1995). Effects of the culture in two schools on the process and outcomes of staff development. The Elementary School Journal, 95(4), 367–385.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. In UltiBase Articles. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm.

Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2001). Moving from andragogy to heutagogy: Implications for VET. In Proceedings of research to reality: Putting VET research to work, Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association (AVETRA), Adelaide, SA, March 28–30. Crows Nest, NSW: AVETRA.

ISTE. (2015). CT Leadership toolkit. http://www.iste.org/docs/ctdocuments/ct-leadershipt-toolkit.pdf?sfvrsn=4.

Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33–50.

Kaplan, A., Öztürk, M., Doruk, M., & Duran, M. (2016). Opinion on the uses of computer in mathematics courses of intellectual disability teachers. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13–2(25), 73–87.

Karagiorgi, Y., & Charalambous, K. (2004). Curricula considerations in ICT integration: Models and practices in Cyprus. Education and Information Technologies, 9(1), 21–35.

Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Özüdoğru, G., Bozkurt, Ş. B., Ülker, Ü., Özgül-Ünsal, N., Boz, K., Bozkurt, Ö. F., Ergül-Sönmez, E., Baştemur-Kaya, C., Karaca, C., Bahadır, H., & Üstün-Gül, H. (2016). 2014 Yılında Eğitim Teknolojileri Alanındaki Yayımlanan Makalelerin İncelenmesi. H. İ. Yalın içinde, Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama (s. 80–108). Ankara.

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 43(6), 740–755.

Kol, S. (2012). Development of attitude scale devoted to the usage of technology in pre-school education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(2), 543–554.

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the Computational Thinking Scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569.

Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., Özden, M. Y., Oluk, A., & Sarıoğlu, S. (2015). Investigation of individuals’ computational thinking skills in terms of different variables. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Education, 34(2), 68–87.

Kukul, V., & Gökçearslan, Ş. (2014). Investigating the problem solving skills of students attended scratch programming course. In 8th International computer and instructional technologies symposium, Trakya University (s. 58–63). Edirne.

Kuşkaya Mumcu, F., & Koçak Usluel, Y. (2004). Use of computers by vocational and technical schools’ teachers and obstacles. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 91–99.

Marker, W. B. (1999). The professional development of teachers. In T. G. K. Bryce & W. M. Humes (Eds.), Scottish education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Narayanan, N. (2017). Powered by Prezi. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 26(6), 8.

Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299–317.

Office of Technology Assessment, OTA. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Report OTA-EHR-616. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment (OTA).

Öztürk, T. (2006). Evaluation of social studies teacher nominees? Competency regarding their use of technology in education (Balikesir sample). Unpublished Master Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.

Saban, A. (2000). Hizmet içi eğitimde yeni yaklaşımlar [New approaches in in-service training]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 145, 25–30.

Saklan, H., & Ünal, C. (2018). Technology friendly science teachers’ views of Educational Information Network (EBA). Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 493–526.

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: AECT.

Seferoğlu, S. S. (2001). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin kendi mesleki gelişimleriyle ilgili görüşleri, beklentileri ve önerileri [Views, expectations and suggestions of classroom teachers about their professional development]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı,, Sayı, 149, 12–18.

Selimoğlu, E., & Biçen-Yılmaz, H. (2009). Hizmet içi eğitimin kurum ve çalışanlar üzerine etkileri [Effects of in-service training on institution and employees]. PARADOKS, Ekonomi, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi, 5(1), 1–12.

Serçemeli, M., & Kurnaz, E. (2016). Investigation of using information technology products with technology acceptance model (TAM) in auditing. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 45(1), 43–52.

Solak, M. (2009). İlköğretimde görev yapan branş öğretmenlerinin eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Opinions about using technologies in educations of branch teachers working at primary schools]. Unpublished Master Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.

Stehr, N. (2005). Knowledge polities, governing the consequences of science and technology. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

Šumak, B., Hericko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077.

Şahin, F., & Alkaya, A. (2017). Tüketicilerin çevrimiçi şikâyet kanallarını kullanımına yönelik davranışlarının: teknoloji kabul modeli ve planlı davranış teorisi bütünleşik modeli bakış açısı ile incelenmesi [Consumers’ behavior toward the use of online complaints channels: Perspective of technology acceptance model and planned behavior theory integrated model]. PESA Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(4), 87–103.

Şahin, M. (2017). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre hizmetiçi eğitim etkinliklerinin işlevselliği [The functionality of in-service training activities according to teachers’ views]. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 23–38.

Şahin, H., Balcı, H., & Çakır, R. (2019). Investigation of teachers’ self improvement in technology usage and their technology acceptance levels. In 13. International computer education and instructional technology symposium (ICITS 2019), May 02–04, 2019, Kırşehir, Turkey

Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kılıçer, K., Akbulut, Y., & Yıldırım, Y. (2008). Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarında güncel eğilimler [Current trends in educational technology research in Turkey]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 439–458.

Taymaz, A. H. (1992). Hizmet içi eğitim [In-service training]. Ankara: Pegem Yayın No. 3.

Tekin, S., & Yaman, S. (2008). The evaluation scale of in-service education program: The development of teachers’ form. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 15–26.

Turan, B., & Haşit, G. (2014). Technology acceptance model and an application on primary school teachers. Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, 6(1), 109–119.

Uçar, R., & İpek, C. (2006). İlköğretim okullarında görev yapan yönetici ve öğretmenlerin MEB hizmet-içi eğitim uygulamalarına ilişkin görüşleri [Opinions of administrators and teachers working in primary schools on MEB in-service training practice]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 34–53.

Ursavaş, Ö. F., Şahin, S., & McIlroy, D. (2014). Technology acceptance measure for teachers: T-TAM. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(4), 885–917.

Waite, S. (2004). Tools for the job: A report of two surveys of information and communications technology training and use for literacy in primary schools in the west of England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 11–20.

Wight, D., & Buston, K. (2003). Meeting needs but not changing goals: Evaluation of in-service teacher training for sex education. Oxford Review of Education., 29(4), 521–543.

Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., & McLean, T. (2017). Computational thinking in teacher education. In P. Rich & C. Hodges (Eds.), Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. Educational communications and technology: Issues and innovations. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13.

Yıldırım, Ö., Kurşun, E., & Göktaş, Y. (2015). The factors affecting the quality of in-service training on information and communication technologies. Education and Science, 40(178), 163–182.

Yurdakul, R. (2019). Matematik öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitimlerinde ders imecesi modelinin uygulama sürecini kolaylaştırmaya yönelik bir web sitesinin tasarlanması ve değerlendirilmesi [Designing and evaluation of a web site to facilitate the implementation lesson study model in in-service trainings of mathematics teachers]. Unpublished Master Thesis, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas.

Yükseltürk, E., & Altıok, S. (2016). Pre-service information technology teachers’ perceptions about using scratch tool in teaching programming. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 39–52.

Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482–515.