The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments

Abdel-Khalik, 2002, Reforming corporate governance post Enron: Shareholder’s board of trustees and the auditor, J. Account. Public Policy, 21, 97, 10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00040-6 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2002. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AICPA, New York, NY. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2009 Albrecht, 1984 Albrecht, 2012 Alon, 2010, The impact of groups and decision aid reliance on fraud risk assessment, Manage. Res. Rev., 33, 240, 10.1108/01409171011030390 Apostolou, 2001, The relative importance of management fraud risk factors, Behavioral Res. Account., 13, 1, 10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.1 Arel, 2012, Auditor liability: a comparison of judge and juror verdicts, J. Account. Public Policy, 31, 516, 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.10.004 Asare, 2004, The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting, Contemp. Account. Res., 21, 325, 10.1506/L20L-7FUM-FPCB-7BE2 Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., Neal, T., 2010. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1998–2007, An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Durham, NC. <http://www.coso.org>. Bell, 2000, A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 19, 169 Bierstaker, 2012, Audit committee compensation, fairness, and the resolution of accounting disagreements, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 31, 131 Bonner, 2008 Bonner, 1996, Using decision aids to improve auditors’ conditional probability judgments, Account. Rev., 71, 221 Center for Audit Quality (CAQ), 2010 Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., 2008. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: How Do We Close the Knowledge Gap? Institute for Fraud Prevention, Morgantown, WV. <http://www.theifp.org/research-grants/IFP-Whitepaper-1.pdf>. Carpenter, 2007, Audit team brainstorming, fraud risk identification, and fraud risk assessment: implications of SAS No. 99, Account. Rev., 82, 1119, 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1119 Chandler, 2009, The perfect storm of leaders’ unethical behavior: a conceptual framework, Int. J. Leadership Stud., 5, 69 Cohen, 2011, The impact of auditor judgments of CEO influence on audit committee independence, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 30, 129 Conover, 1982, Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation, Biometrics, 38, 715, 10.2307/2530051 Cressey, 1973 Crowe Horwath, 2010 Crowe Horwath, 2012 Deloitte, 2010 DeZoort, 2012, Tax professionals’ responsibility for fraud detection: the effects of engagement type and audit status, Account. Horizons, 26, 289, 10.2308/acch-50137 Dorminey, 2010, Beyond the fraud triangle: enhancing deterrence of economic crimes, CPA J., 17 Dorminey, 2011, Beyond the fraud triangle: enhancing deterrence of economic crimes, Fraud Magazine, 18 Dorminey, 2012, The evolution of fraud theory, Issues Account. Educ., 27, 555, 10.2308/iace-50131 Dowling, 2007, Audit support systems and decision aids: current practice and opportunities for future research, Int. J. Account. Inform. Syst., 8, 92, 10.1016/j.accinf.2007.04.001 Eagly, 2007 Eining, 1997, Reliance on decision aids: an examination of auditors’ assessment of management fraud, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 16, 1 Farag, 2012, The impact of accounting students’ professional skepticism on their ethical perception of earnings management, Res. Prof. Responsib. Ethics Account., 16, 185 Feng, 2011, Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations?, J. Account. Econ., 51, 21, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.005 Hackenbrack, 1992, Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment, J. Account. Res., 30, 126, 10.2307/2491095 Hammersley, 2011, A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 30, 101 Hammersley, 2011, How do audit seniors respond to heightened fraud risk, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 30, 81 Harvey, 2007, A bully as an archetypal destructive leader, J. Leadership Organiz. Stud., 14, 117, 10.1177/1071791907308217 Hatfield, 2010, The effect of magnitude of audit difference and prior client concessions on negotiations of proposed adjustments, Account. Rev., 85, 1647, 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1647 Hoffman, 1997, Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors’ fraud judgments, J. Account. Res., 35, 227, 10.2307/2491362 Hogan, 2008, Financial statement fraud: insights from the academic literature, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 27, 231 Hurtt, 2010, Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 29, 149 Hurtt, 2013, Research on auditor professional skepticism: literature synthesis and opportunities for future research, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 32, 45 International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), 2010. International Standard on Auditing No. 240: The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. IFAC, New York, NY. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), AICPA, and ACFE, 2008. Managing the Business Risk of Fraud: A Practical Guide. The IIA, Altamonte Springs, FL. Johnson, 2013, Auditor perceptions of client narcissism as a fraud attitude risk factor, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 32, 203 Kassem, 2012, The new fraud triangle model, J. Emerg. Trends Econ. Manage. Sci., 3, 191 Kish-Gephart, 2010, Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work, J. Appl. Psychol., 95, 1, 10.1037/a0017103 Kochetova-Kozloski, 2011, Improving auditors’ fraud judgments using a frequency response mode, Contemp. Account. Res., 28, 837, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01067.x Lynch, 2009, Fraud brainstorming using computer-mediated communication: the effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation, Account. Rev., 84, 1209, 10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1209 McEnroe, 2001, Auditors’ and investors’ perceptions of the “expectation gap”, Account. Horizons, 15, 345, 10.2308/acch.2001.15.4.345 Nelson, 2009, A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 28, 1 Nelson, 2005, Judgment and decision-making research in auditing: a task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 24, 41 Norman, 2010, Internal audit reporting lines, fraud risk decomposition, and assessments of fraud risk, Acc. Organ. Soc., 35, 546, 10.1016/j.aos.2009.12.003 Parker, 2012, Seeing what you want to see: perceptual biases of auditors, J. Manage. Policy Practice, 13, 11 Paulhus, 2002, The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy, J. Res. Pers., 36, 556, 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2007. Observations on Auditors’ Implementation of PCAOB Standards Relating to Auditors’ Responsibilities with Respect to Fraud. PCAOB Release No. 2007-001 (January 22). PCAOB, Washington, DC. <http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/2007_01-22_Release_2007-001.pdf>. Pincus, 1989, The efficacy of a red flags questionnaire for assessing the possibility of fraud, Acc. Organ. Soc., 14, 153, 10.1016/0361-3682(89)90039-1 Ping, 2007, The impact of the public’s expectations of auditors on audit quality and auditing standards compliance, Contemp. Account. Res., 24, 631, 10.1506/T776-2658-Q417-1110 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), 2009. Fraud in a Downturn: A Review of How Fraud and Other Integrity Risks Affect Business. PwC, New York, NY. Ramamoorti, 2008, The psychology and sociology of fraud: Integrating the behavioral sciences component into fraud and forensic accounting curricula, Issues Account. Educ., 23, 521, 10.2308/iace.2008.23.4.521 Rosenthal, 2006, Narcissistic leadership, Leadership Quart., 17, 617, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005 Shanteau, J., Peters, J., 1989. The 3 C’s of Expert Audit Judgment: Creativity, Confidence, and Communication. Paper Presented at the February 1989 USC Audit Judgment Symposium. <http://www.k-state.edu/psych/cws/pdf/3C89.pdf>. Shirley, 1981, A distribution-free method for analysis of covariance based on ranked data, Appl. Stat., 30, 158, 10.2307/2346386 Trompeter, 2013, A synthesis of fraud related research, Audit.: J. Practice Theory, 32, 287 United States v. Arthur Young & Co, 1984. 465 U.S. 805. Wilks, 2004, Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues, Contemp. Account. Res., 21, 719, 10.1506/HGXP-4DBH-59D1-3FHJ Wolfe, 2004, The fraud diamond: considering four elements of fraud, CPA J., 38