The effect of a topical anaesthetic formulation, systemic flunixin and carprofen, singly or in combination, on cortisol and behavioural responses of Merino lambs to mulesing

Australian Veterinary Journal - Tập 85 Số 3 - Trang 98-106 - 2007
DR Paull1, Caroline Lee1, Ian G. Colditz1, S. J. Atkinson1, Andrew Fisher1
1CSIRO Livestock Industries, FD McMaster Laboratory, Armidale NSW 2350 [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Objective  To determine the pain responses of lambs to mulesing, and the effectiveness of potential analgesic treatments.

Procedures  Merino lambs (n = 64) were allocated at 5 weeks of age to eight treatment groups: 1) sham mules; 2) conventional mules; 3) topical anaesthetic, incorporating lignocaine, bupivicaine, adrenaline and cetrimide, applied immediately after mulesing; 4) flunixin + topical anaesthetic, with flunixin administered 2.5 mg/kg s.c. 90 min before mulesing; 5) carprofen + topical anaesthetic, with carprofen administered 4 mg/kg s.c. 90 min before mulesing; 6) carprofen, administered as above; 7) flunixin, administered as above; and 8) carprofen + flunixin, administered as above. Plasma cortisol was measured at 0, 0.5, 6, 12 and 24 h relative to mulesing. Animal behaviour, including posture, was recorded for 12 h after mulesing.

Results  The conventional mules lambs exhibited large increases in plasma cortisol, reduced lying and increased standing with a hunched back compared with sham mules animals. Topical anaesthetic reduced the cortisol peak to mulesing and hunched standing, and increased lying compared with the conventional mules treatment, but generally did not result in values equivalent to sham mules animals. Carprofen, flunixin, and carprofen + flunixin treatments did not reduce the cortisol response to mulesing but substantially ameliorated some changes in behavioural postures. Flunixin + topical anaesthetic reduced the cortisol peak following mulesing and substantially ameliorated most changes in behavioural postures. Carprofen + topical anaesthetic abolished the cortisol peak following mulesing and substantially ameliorated most changes in behavioural postures. All mulesed animals lost weight in the week after mulesing regardless of analgesic administration, but there were no significant differences in growth rate between any of the eight treatments over the 3 weeks after mulesing.

Conclusions  Analgesics can moderate the pain response of lambs to mulesing. The welfare outcome for lambs of mulesing could be improved by use of a combination of local anaesthetic and long acting non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Primary Industries Standing Committee, 2006, Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals. The Sheep.

10.1111/j.1751-0813.1984.tb07222.x

Australian Sheep and Wool Industry Taskforce.Industry agreement on mulesinghttp://www.nff.org.au/pages/policies_printfiles/NR_TF_08_11_04_PETA.pdf.2004. Retrieved 7 March 2006.

10.1080/00480169.1997.36005

10.1080/00480169.1999.36143

10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80041-X

10.1111/j.1751-0813.1999.tb12917.x

10.1016/S1090-0233(98)80033-6

10.1016/S1090-0233(97)80013-5

10.1016/0034-5288(91)90013-E

10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10004.x

10.1111/j.1751-0813.2004.tb12712.x

10.1080/00480169.2000.36156

10.1016/B978-070202035-3.50011-5

10.1016/0266-7681(87)90192-6

10.1016/B978-0-7020-1767-4.50008-4

10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00573.x

10.1016/0034-5288(95)90090-X

10.1136/inpract.13.1.31

10.1016/0034-5288(92)90123-J

GilmourAR GogelBJ CullisBR WelhamSJandThompsonR.ASReml user guide release 1.0.2002VSN International Ltd Hemel Hempstead HP1 1ES UK.

R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna Austria. ISBN 3‐900051‐00‐3.2004.

Phillips CJC., 1998, The use of individual dairy cows as replicates in the statistical analysis of their behaviour at pasture, Appl Anim Behav Sci, 60, 365

10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00131-3

10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00002-3

Shutt DA, 1987, Stress‐induced changes in plasma concentrations of immunoreactive beta‐endorphin and cortisol in response to routine surgical procedures in lambs, Aust J Biol Sci, 40, 97, 10.1071/BI9870097

10.1016/0168-1591(89)90023-3

10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.011

10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00613.x

10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.04.008

10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb10004.x

10.1016/0034-5288(94)90119-8

10.1136/vr.155.21.667

10.2527/2006.842351x

10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00045-0

10.2527/2002.8041044x

10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.06.001

10.1079/9780851993591.0171

10.1080/00480169.1996.35933

10.2527/1997.7551244x

10.2527/1996.74102336x