The dynamics of collective social behavior in a crowd controlled game

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 8 - Trang 1-16 - 2019
Alberto Aleta1,2, Yamir Moreno1,2,3
1Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
2Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
3ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy

Tóm tắt

Despite many efforts, the behavior of a crowd is not fully understood. The advent of modern communication means has made it an even more challenging problem, as crowd dynamics could be driven by both human-to-human and human-technology interactions. Here, we study the dynamics of a crowd controlled game (Twitch Plays Pokémon), in which nearly a million players participated during more than two weeks. Unlike other online games, in this event all the players controlled exactly the same character and thus it represents an exceptional example of a collective mind working to achieve a certain goal. We dissect the temporal evolution of the system dynamics along the two distinct phases that characterized the game. We find that having a fraction of players who do not follow the crowd’s average behavior is key to succeed in the game. The latter finding can be well explained by an nth order Markov model that reproduces the observed behavior. Secondly, we analyze a phase of the game in which players were able to decide between two different modes of playing, mimicking a voting system. We show that the introduction of this system clearly polarized the community, splitting it in two. Finally, we discuss one of the peculiarities of these groups in the light of the social identity theory, which appears to describe well some of the observed dynamics.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams D, Hogg MA (2001) Collective identity: group membership and self-conception. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes, pp 425–460 Le Bon G (1895) The crowd: a study of the popular mind Reicher SD (2008) The psychology of crowd dynamics. In: Blackwell handbook of social psychology: group processes La Macchia ST, Louis WR (2016) Crowd behaviour and collective action. In: Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory. Springer, Cham, pp 89–104 Reicher S, Stott C, Cronin P, Adang O (2004) An integrated approach to crowd psychology and public order policing. Policing, Int J Police Strateg Manag 27(4):558–572 Kozinets RV, Hemetsberger A, Schau HJ (2008) The wisdom of consumer crowds: collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. J Macromark 28(4):339–354 von Ahn L, Maurer B, McMillen C, Abraham D, Blum M (2008) reCAPTCHA: human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science 321(5895):1465–1468 Baumeister RF, Ainsworth SE, Vohs KD (2016) Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification. Behav Brain Sci 39:137 Latané B (1981) The psychology of social impact. Am Psychol 36(4):343 Quinn AJ, Bederson BB (2011) Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI ’11. ACM, New York, pp 1403–1412 Malone TW, Laubacher R, Dellarocas C (2010) The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(3):21 Mason W, Watts DJ (2010) Financial incentives and the performance of crowds. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(2):100–108 Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J Econ Lit 37(1):7–63 Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: a tale of two markets. Psychol Sci 15(11):787–793 Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Q J Econ 115(3):791–810 Kittur A, Nickerson JV, Bernstein M, Gerber E, Shaw A, Zimmerman J, Lease M, Horton J (2013) The future of crowd work. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work. CSCW ’13. ACM, New York, pp 1301–1318 Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisti A (2017) Beyond the turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. J Exp Soc Psychol 70:153–163 Cox J, Oh EY, Simmons B, Lintott C, Masters K, Greenhill A, Graham G, Holmes K (2015) Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: a case study of zooniverse projects. Comput Sci Eng 17(4):28–41 von Ahn L (2006) Games with a purpose. Computer 39(6):92–94 Khatib F, Cooper S, Tyka MD, Xu K, Makedon I, Popović Z, Baker D, Players F (2011) Algorithm discovery by protein folding game players. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(47):18949–18953 Bernstein M, Tan D, Smith G, Czerwinski M, Horvitz E (2009) Collabio: a game for annotating people within social networks. In: UIST ’09 Salk CF, Sturn T, See L, Fritz S, Perger C (2016) Assessing quality of volunteer crowdsourcing contributions: lessons from the Cropland Capture game. Int J Digit Earth 9(4):410–426 Birke A, Schoenau-Fog H, Reng L (2012) Space bugz!: a smartphone-controlled crowd game. In: Proceeding of the 16th international academic MindTrek conference. MindTrek ’12. ACM, New York, pp 217–219 Description of The Button event (2019) https://perma.cc/HLV8-NTBL Müller TF, Winters J (2018) Compression in cultural evolution: homogeneity and structure in the emergence and evolution of a large-scale online collaborative art project. PLoS ONE 13(9):0202019 Rappaz J, Catasta M, West R, Aberer K Latent structure in collaboration: the case of Reddit R/place. arXiv:1804.05962 Guinness World Records 2015 Gamer’s Edition (2014) Guinness book Pokémon passes 300 million games sold (2018) https://perma.cc/DC6H-GTMV Althoff T, White RW, Horvitz E (2016) Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity: study and implications. J Med Internet Res 18(12):315 Sjöblom M, Hamari J (2017) Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Comput Hum Behav 75:985–996 Twitch is 4th in Peak US Internet Traffic (2018) https://perma.cc/5V9Y-YYPG Churchill BCB, Xu W (2016) The modem nation: a first study on Twitch.TV social structure and player/game relationships. In: 2016 IEEE international conferences on big data and cloud computing (BDCloud), social computing and networking (SocialCom), sustainable computing and communications (SustainCom) (BDCloud-SocialCom-SustainCom), pp 223–228 Flynn-Jones E (2015) Well played, vol 3. ETC Press, Pittsburgh Twitch Plays Pokémon timeline (2018) https://perma.cc/5V9Y-YYPG Time needed to finish Pokémon Red (2018) https://perma.cc/6Y69-76KH Lindsey M-V (2015) Religion in digital games relodaded, vol 7. Institute for Religious Studies, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Chap. 6 Centola D, Baronchelli A (2015) The spontaneous emergence of conventions: an experimental study of cultural evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(7):1989–1994 Kirman B, Lineham C, Lawson S (2012) Exploring mischief and mayhem in social computing or: how we learned to stop worrying and love the trolls. In: CHI ’12 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 121–130 Paul HL, Bowman ND, Banks J (2015) The enjoyment of griefing in online games. J Gaming Virtual Worlds 7(3):243–258 Buckels EE, Trapnell PD, Paulhus DL (2014) Trolls just want to have fun. Pers Individ Differ 67:97–102 A strategy to traverse the ledge (2019) https://perma.cc/FFK8-9CHG Sunstein CR (1999) The law of group polarization. J Polit Philos 10(2):175–195 Conover M, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco MR, Gonçalves B, Menczer F, Flammini A (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133:89–96 Galton F (1907) Vox populi (the wisdom of crowds). Nature 75(7):450–451 Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations, vol 296. Anchor Books, New York Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433(7025):513 Dyer JR, Ioannou CC, Morrell LJ, Croft DP, Couzin ID, Waters DA, Krause J (2008) Consensus decision making in human crowds. Anim Behav 75(2):461–470 Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: a randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651 Rosenberg LB (2015) Human swarming, a real-time method for parallel distributed intelligence. In: 2015 swarm/human blended intelligence workshop (SHBI), pp 1–7 Rosenberg L, Baltaxe D, Pescetelli N (2016) Crowds vs swarms, a comparison of intelligence. In: 2016 swarm/human blended intelligence workshop (SHBI), pp 1–4 Lee RLM (2017) Do online crowds really exist? Proximity, connectivity and collectivity. Distinktion J Soc Theory 18(1):82–94 Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Kraft-Todd GT, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O, Nowak MA, Greene JD (2014) Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat Commun 5:3677 Yamagishi T, Matsumoto Y, Kiyonari T, Takagishi H, Li Y, Kanai R, Sakagami M (2017) Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:6394–6399 Kameda T, Tsukasaki T, Hastie R, Berg N (2011) Democracy under uncertainty: the wisdom of crowds and the free-rider problem in group decision making. Psychol Rev 118(1):76–96 Hung AA, Plott CR (2001) Information cascades: replication and an extension to majority rule and conformity-rewarding institutions. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1508–1520 White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol Rev 66(5):297–333 Klimmt C, Hartmann T, Frey A (2007) Effectance and control as determinants of video game enjoyment. CyberPsychol Behav 10(6):845–848 Mekler ED, Bopp JA, Tuch AN, Opwis K (2014) A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 927–936 Bartle R (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit muds van den Hoogen W, Poels K, IJsselsteijn W, de Kort Y (2012) Between challenge and defeat: repeated player-death and game enjoyment. Media Psychol 15(4):443–459 Spears R, Postmes T (2015) Group identity, social influence and collective action online: extensions and applications of the SIDE model. In: Sundar S (ed) Handbooks in communication and media. Wiley–Blackwell, Chichester, pp 23–46 Nylund A, Landfors O (2015) Frustration and its effect on immersion in games: a developer viewpoint on the good and bad aspects of frustration. DIVA The rise of masocore gaming (2018) https://perma.cc/HKD3-KP2Q Games with Busted Physics and Controls (2018) https://perma.cc/Z33L-NUSW Ramirez D, Saucerman J, Dietmeier J (2014) Twitch plays pokemon: a case study in big g games. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2014, Snowbird, UT Chat logs and videos of the whole event (2014) https://archive.org/