The digit ratio (2D:4D) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 women

Alonso, J., Di Paolo, R., Ponti, G., & Sartarelli, M. (2018). Facts and misconceptions about 2D:4D, social and risk preferences. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 22.

Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(6), 384–390.

Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., Gray, P. B., Hoffman, M., Little, A. C., & Campbell, B. C. (2011). Androgens and competitiveness in men. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4(1), 54.

Aycinena, D., Baltaduonis, R., & Rentschler, L. (2014). Risk preferences and prenatal exposure to sex hormones for ladinos. PloS One, 9(8), e103332.

Barel, E. (2017). 2D:4D, Optimism, and Risk Taking. In Current Psychology, pp. 1–9.

Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., et al. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6.

Bönte, W., Procher, V. D., & Urbig, D. (2016). Biology and selection into entrepreneurship—The relevance of prenatal testosterone exposure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(5), 1121–1148.

Bönte, W., Procher, V. D., Urbig, D., & Voracek, M. (2017). Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts self-reported measures of general competitiveness, but not behavior in economic experiments. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 238.

Boschini, A., Dreber, A., von Essen, E., Muren, A., & Ranehill, E. (2018). Gender, risk preferences and willingness to compete in a random sample of the Swedish population. Available at SSRN 3241415.

Brañas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2018). Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): Evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review, 59(3), 1131–1157.

Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A.M., Garcia-Muñoz, T., & Kovářík, J. (2019). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and pro-social behavior in economic games: No direct correlation with generosity, bargaining or trust-related behaviors. Biology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0185 .

Brañas-Garza, P., Kovářík, J., & Neyse, L. (2013). Second-to-fourth digit ratio has a non-monotonic impact on altruism. PloS One, 8(4), e60419.

Brañas-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: Not just risk taking. PloS One, 6(12), e29842.

Brown, W. M., Hines, M., Fane, B. A., & Marc Breedlove, S. (2002). Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 42(4), 380–386.

Buser, T. (2012). Digit ratios, the menstrual cycle and social preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(2), 457–470.

Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83(1), 50–58.

Chicaiza-Becerra, L. A., & Garcia-Molina, M. (2017). Prenatal testosterone predicts financial risk taking: Evidence from Latin America. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 32–37.

Coates, J. M., & Page, L. (2009). A note on trader Sharpe Ratios. PloS One, 4(11), e8036.

Cohen-Bendahan, C. (2005). Biological roots of sex differences: A longitudinal twin study. Nijmegen: C. Cohen-Bendahan.

Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.

Dariel, A., Kephart, C., & Nikiforakis, N., Zenker, C. (2017). Emirati women do not shy away from competition: Evidence from a patriarchal society in transition. Journal of the Economic Science Association 3(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-017-0045-y .

de Miranda, K. L., Neyse, L., & Schmidt, U. (2018). Risk preferences and predictions about others: No association with 2D:4D ratio. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 9.

Dreber, A., & Hoffman, M. (2007). Portfolio selection in utero. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.

Dreber, A., & Johannesson, M. (2018). Sex hormones and economic decision making in the lab: A review of the causal evidence. In O. Schultheiss & P. Mehta (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of social neuroendocrinology. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis Group.

Drichoutis, A. C., & Nayga, R. M. (2015). Do risk and time preferences have biological roots? Southern Economic Journal, 82(1), 235–256.

Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 1061–1073.

Galizzi, M. M., & Nieboer, J. (2015). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and altruism: evidence from a large, multi-ethnic sample. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 41.

Garbarino, E., Slonim, R., & Sydnor, J. (2011). Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 1–26.

Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Working Paper.

Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing type S (sign) and type M (magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651.

Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637–1664.

Grimbos, T., Dawood, K., Burriss, R. P., Zucker, K. J., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Sexual orientation and the second to fourth finger length ratio: A meta-analysis in men and women. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124(2), 278.

Hiraishi, K., Sasaki, S., Shikishima, C., & Ando, J. (2012). The second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) in a Japanese twin sample: Heritability, prenatal hormone transfer, and association with sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 711–724.

Hollier, L. P., Keelan, J. A., Jamnadass, E. S. L., Maybery, M. T., Hickey, M., & Whitehouse, A. J. O. (2015). Adult digit ratio (2D: 4D) is not related to umbilical cord androgen or estrogen concentrations, their ratios or net bioactivity. Early Human Development, 91(2), 111–117.

Hönekopp, J., & Schuster, M. (2010). A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts the other. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 4–10.

Hönekopp, J., & Watson, S. (2011). Meta-analysis of the relationship between digit-ratio 2D:4D and aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 381–386.

Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Raggatt, P., Knickmeyer, R., & Manning, J. T. (2004). 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Human Development, 77(1), 23–28.

Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Wilson, J., & Iwan Lewis-Jones, D. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 13(11), 3000–3004.

McIntyre, M. H. (2006). The use of digit ratios as markers for perinatal androgen action. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 4(1), 10.

Medland, S. E., Loehlin, J. C., & Martin, N. G. (2008). No effects of prenatal hormone transfer on digit ratio in a large sample of same-and opposite-sex dizygotic twins. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1225–1234.

Miller, E. M. (1994). Prenatal sex hormone transfer: A reason to study opposite-sex twins. Personality and Individual Differences, 17(4), 511–529.

Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2006). Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior. Biological Psychology, 71(1), 111–115.

Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. (2009). The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game. British Journal of Psychology, 100(1), 151–162.

Nelson, J. A. (2015). Are women really more risk-averse than men? A re-analysis of the literature using expanded methods. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(3), 566–585.

Neyse, L., Vieider, F.M., Ring, P., Probst, C., Kaernbach, C., van Eimeren, T., & Schmidt, U. (2019). Risk attitudes and digit ratio (2D:4D): Evidence from prospect theory. Available at SSRN 3409084.

Neyse, L., Bosworth, S., Ring, P., & Schmidt, U. (2016). Overconfidence, incentives and digit ratio. Scientific Reports, 6, 23294.

Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1067–1101.

Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Marc Breedlove, S. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 100.

Ranehill, E., Zethraeus, N., Blomberg, L., von Schoultz, B., Hirschberg, A. L., Johannesson, M., et al. (2017). Hormonal contraceptives do not impact economic preferences: Evidence from a randomized trial. Management Science, 64(10), 4515–4532.

Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(36), 15268–15273.

Savic, I., Frisen, L., Manzouri, A., Nordenstrom, A., & Hirschberg, A. L. (2017). Role of testosterone and Y chromosome genes for the masculinization of the human brain. Human Brain Mapping, 38(4), 1801–1814.

Schipper, B.C. (2014). Sex hormones and choice under risk. Working Paper.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.

Stenstrom, E., Saad, G., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Mendenhall, Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 412–416.

Sytsma, T. (2014). Handling risk: Testosterone and risk preference, evidence from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Master’s thesis, The University of San Francisco.

van Anders, S. M., Vernon, P. A., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins. Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 315–319.

Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. G. (2007). Digit ratio (2D:4D) in twins: Heritability estimates and evidence for a masculinized trait expression in women from opposite-sex pairs. Psychological Reports, 100(1), 115–126.

Voracek, M., & Loibl, L. M. (2009). Scientometric analysis and bibliography of digit ratio (2D:4D) research, 1998–2008. Psychological Reports, 104(3), 922–956.

Voracek, M., Pietschnig, J., Nader, I. W., & Stieger, S. (2011). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex-role orientation: Further evidence and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 417–422.