Biện chứng của chăm sóc sức khỏe và xã hội: hướng tới một khuôn khổ khái niệm

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 39 - Trang 575-591 - 2010
Paul Leduc Browne1
1Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada

Tóm tắt

Khó khăn trong việc khái niệm hóa chăm sóc sức khỏe và xã hội xuất phát từ tính chất phức tạp và biện chứng của nó: các mối quan hệ xã hội cấu thành không thể giảm về một logic đơn lẻ hay một loại tác nhân duy nhất; nó vừa là một ý tưởng mô tả vừa là một ý tưởng chuẩn mực, một công cụ phân loại và đánh giá, một phương tiện phân tích và một vũ khí phê bình. Nó vừa mang tính lý thuyết vừa thực tiễn, một cấu trúc khoa học và một lập trường đạo đức, được bắt rễ cả trong các ngành học thuật và các thực tiễn đa dạng của chăm sóc sức khỏe và xã hội. Bài báo này làm nổi bật cốt lõi triệt để của khái niệm chăm sóc như một hình thức lao động đối thoại, vượt ra ngoài hành động đơn thuần mang tính công cụ hoặc chiến lược; sau đó, nó khám phá những mâu thuẫn của thực hành này trong bối cảnh phân công xã hội về chăm sóc trong chủ nghĩa tư bản muộn.

Từ khóa

#biện chứng #chăm sóc sức khỏe #chăm sóc xã hội #khái niệm #chủ nghĩa tư bản muộn

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abel, E. K., & Nelson, M. K. (1990). Circles of care. An introductory essay. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care. Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 4–34). Albany: State University of New York Press. Adloff, F., & Mau, S. (2006). Giving social ties, reciprocity in modernity. Archives of European Sociology, 47(1), 93–123. Armstrong, P. (2004). Thinking it through: Women, work, and caring in the new millennium. In K. R. Grant, C. Amaratunga, P. Armstrong, M. Boscoe, A. Pederson, & K. Willson (Eds.), Caring for /Caring about. Women, home care, and unpaid caregiving (pp. 5–43). Aurora: Garamond. Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (2004). Planning for care: Approaches to human resources policy and planning in health care. In P.-G. Forest, G. P. Marchildon, & T. McIntosh (Eds.), Changing health care in Canada (Volume 2 of The Romanow Papers) (pp. 117–149). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Armstrong, P., Banerjee, A., Szebehely, M., Armstrong, H., Daly, T., & Lafrance, S. (2009). They deserve better. The long-term care experience in Canada and Scandinavia. Ottawa: CCPA. Baines, D. (2004). Caring for nothing: work organization and unwaged labour in social services. Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), 267–295. Baines, D. (2006). “Whose needs are being served?” Quantitative metrics and the reshaping of social services. Studies in Political Economy, 77, 195–209. Baldock, J. (1997). Social care in old age: more than a funding problem. Social Policy & Administration, 31(1), 73–89. Beckett, C. (2007). Women, disability, care: good neighbours or uneasy bedfellows? Critical Social Policy, 27(3), 360–380. Bolton, S. (2005). Emotion management in the workplace. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit. Bourdieu, P. (2003). Méditations pascaliennes (revised edition). Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Browne, P. L. (2000). Unsafe practices. Restructuring and privatization in Ontario health care. Ottawa: CCPA. Browne, P. L. (2003). The social division of care in a world of commodities. In P. L. Browne (Ed.), The commodity of care. Home care reform in Ontario (pp. 1–22). Ottawa: CCPA. Browne, P. L. (2009a). Conflict, competition and cooperation in the social division of health care. In A. Denis & D. K. Fishman (Eds.), The ISA handbook in contemporary sociology (pp. 250–264). London: Sage. Browne, P. L. (2009b). Spatialité et conditions de vie: le cas du soutien à domicile. Paper presented to the Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales. Montreal, February. Caudwell, C. (1973). Illusion and reality. New York: International Publishers. Chanial, P. (2008). Ce que le don donne à voir. In P. Chanial (Ed.), La société vue du don. Manuel de sociologie anti-utilitariste appliquée (pp. 9–42). Paris: Éditions La Découverte. Cresson, G., & Gadrey, N. (2004). Entre famille et métier: le travail du care. Nouvelles questions féministes, 23(3), 26–41. Daly, M., & Lewis, J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281–298. Diamond, T. (1990). Nursing homes as trouble. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care. Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 173–187). Albany: State University of New York Press. Diamond, T. (1992). Making gray gold. Narratives of nursing home care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399. Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care. Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). Albany: State University of New York Press. Glucksmann, M. (1995). Why “work”? Gender and the total social organization of labour. Gender, Work and Organization, 2(2), 63–75. Godbout, J. (2000). Le don, la dette et l’identité, Homo donator vs homo oeconomicus. Montréal: Boréal. Godbout, J. (2007). Ce qui circule entre nous. Donner, recevoir, rendre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Godelier, M. (2007). Au fondement des sociétés humaines. Paris: Albin Michel. Gouldner, A. (1973a). The norm of reciprocity. In For sociology (pp. 226–259). London: Allen Lane. Gouldner, A. (1973b). The importance of something for nothing. In For sociology (pp. 260–299). London: Allen Lane. Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value. The false coin of our own dreams. New York: Palgrave. Gustafson, D. L. (2000). Home care before and after reform: A comparative analysis of two texts-in-action. In D. L. Gustafson (Ed.), Care and consequences. The impact of health care reform (pp. 177–198). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon. Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell. Himmelweit, S. (1999). Caring labor. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 561, 27–38. Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan. With a foreword by C.B. Macpherson. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Hochschild, A. (2003). The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press. Hollway, W. (2006). The capacity to care. Gender and ethical subjectivity. London: Routledge. Hughes, B., McKie, L., Hopkins, D., & Watson, N. (2005). Love’s labours lost? Feminism, the disabled people’s movement and an ethic of care. Sociology, 39(2), 259–275. James, N. (1989). Emotional labour: skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. The Sociological Review, 1, 15–42. James, N. (1992). Care = Organization + Physical Labour + Emotional Labour. In E. Annandale, M. A. Elston, & L. Prior (Eds.), Medical work, medical knowledge and health care (pp. 265–284). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Jetté, C. (2008). Les organismes communautaires et la transformation de l’État-providence. Trois décennies de coconstruction des politiques publiques dans le domaine de la santé et des services sociaux. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec. Laville, J.-L., & Nyssens, M. (Eds.) (2001). Les services sociaux entre associations, État et marché. L’aide aux personnes âgées. Paris: La Découverte/M.A.U.S.S./C.R.I.D.A. Leys, C. (2001). Market-driven politics. Neoliberal democracy and the public interest. London: Verso. Livant, B. (1998). I’ll make you an offer you can’t refuse. Science & Society, 62(3), 373–374. Lukács, G. (1963). Ästhetik, I. Die Eigenart des Ästhetischen. Werke, Vols. 11 & 12. Neuwied: Luchterhand. Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin. Maheu, L., & Bien-Aimé, P.-A. (1996). Et si le travail exercé sur l’humain faisait une différence.. Sociologie et sociétés, 28(1), 189–199. Marin, I. (2008). Don et sacrifice en cancérologie. In P. Chanial (Ed.), La société vue du don. Manuel de sociologie anti-utilitariste appliquée (pp. 401–412). Paris: La Découverte. Marx, K. (1976). Results of the immediate process of production. In Capital, vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Meagher, G. (2006). What can we expect from paid carers? Politics & Society, 34(1), 33–53. Mellow, M. (2007). Hospital volunteers and carework. Canadian Review of Sociology, 44(4), 451–467. Molinier, P. (2004). La haine et l’amour, la boîte noire du féminisme? Une critique de l’éthique du dévouement. Nouvelles questions féministes, 23(1), 12–25. Rankin, J. M., & Campbell, M. L. (2006). Managing to nurse. Inside Canada’s health care reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Simmel, G. (1950). Faithfulness and gratitude. In K. H. Wolf (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 379–395). New York: Free. Thomas, C. (1993). De-constructing concepts of care. Sociology, 27(4), 649–669. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge. Twigg, J. (2000). Bathing ~ the body and community care. London: Routledge. Visser, M. (2008). The gift of thanks. The roots, persistence, and paradoxical meanings of a social ritual. Toronto: Harper Collins. Williams, F. (1999). Good-enough principles for welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 28(4), 667–687. Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493. Williams, F. (2003). Rethinking care in social policy. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Finnish Social Policy Association, University of Joensuu, Finland, October 24. Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion. Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.