The developmentally handicapped witness

Law and Human Behavior - Tập 18 - Trang 171-187 - 1994
Nitza B. Perlman1, Kristine I. Ericson1, Victoria M. Esses2, Barry J. Isaacs1
1Surrey Place Centre, Toronto
2University of Western Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

This study compared the ability of 30 developmentally handicapped (DH) and 30 nonhandicapped individuals in their ability to report on witnessed events. Participants watched a film clip and were asked to respond to five different types of questions about it. Misleading or leading questions were embedded in three of the question types Results indicated that in response to free recall and very general questions, DH participants did not provide as complete responses as did nonhandicapped participants, although the information provided by both groups tended to be quite accurate. Both groups, and particularly DH individuals, were less accurate in responding to more focused shortanswer recall questions. In response to correct leading specific and statement questions, requiring recognition of the information provided, DH and control participants were comparable in their performance. DH participants had greater difficulty with misleading recall questions and false leading specific and statement questions. Results are discussed in terms of optimizing eyewitness accuracy in DH individuals.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ceci, J. & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439. Ceci, S., Caves, R. & Howe, M. (1981). Children's long-term memory for information that is incongruous with their prior knowledge.British Journal of Psychology, 72, 443–450. Ceci, S., & Howe, M. (1978). Semantic knowledge as a determinant of developmental differences in recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 230–245. Christianson, S., & Loftus, E. (1987). Memory for traumatic events.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225–239. Cohen, R., & Harnick, M. (1980). The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion.Law and Human Behavior, 4, 201–210. Dale, P., Loftus, E., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269–277. Dent, H. (1986). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 13–17. Glidden, L., & Mar, H. (1978). Availability and accessibility of information in the semantic memory of retarded and nonretarded adolescents.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 33–40. Goodman, G. (1984). The child witness: conclusions and future directions for research and legal practice.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 157–175. Goodman, G., & Reed, R. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332. Goodman, G., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds.),Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). New York: Cambridge University Press. Gudjonsson, G., & Gunn, J. (1982). The competence and reliability of a witness in a criminal court: a case report.British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 624–627. Johnson, M. & Foley, M. (1984). Differentiating fact from fantasy: the reliability of children's memory.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 33–50. Loftus, E., & Davies, G. (1984). Distortions in the memory of children.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 51–67. Loftus, E., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of wording of a question.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86–88. Mann, E. (1985). The assessment of credibility of sexually abused children in criminal court cases.American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 6, 9–15. Marin, B., Holmes, D., Guth, M. & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295–305. Perlmutter, M., & Myers, N. (1976). Recognition memory in preschool children.Developmental Psychology, 12, 271–272. Perlmutter, M., & Myers, N. (1975). Young children's coding and storage of visual and verbal material.Child Development, 46, 215–219. Perlmutter, M., & Ricks, M. (1979). Recall in preschool children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 423–436. Pirolli, P., & Mitterer, J. (1984). The effect of leading questions on prior memory: Evidence for the coexistence of inconsistent memory traces.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 135–141. Quinn, K. (1986). Competency to be a witness: A major child forensic issue.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 14, 311–321. Ramey, C., & Finkelstein, N. (1981). Psychosocial metal retardation. In: P. Brooks, R. Sperber & C. McCauley (Eds.),Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 419–432). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Ross, D., Dunning, D., Toglia, M., & Ceci, S. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury.Law and Human Behavior, 124, 5–23. Senn, C. (1988). Vulnerable:Sexual abuse and people with an intellectural handicap. Toronto: The G. Allan Roeher Institute. Yates, A. (1987). Should young children testify in cases of sexual abuse?American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 476–480.