The development of a measurement tool for the assessment of pain behaviour in real time

Physiotherapy - Tập 90 - Trang 12-18 - 2004
Lorraine L Moores1, Paul J Watson2
1Manchester and Salford Pain Centre, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK
2Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fordyce WE. Behavioural methods for chronic pain and illness. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby; 1976. Keefe, 2002, The assessment of pain behavior: implications for applied psychophysiology and future research directions, Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback, 7, 117, 10.1023/A:1016240126437 Turk, 1987, Pain > pain behaviours: the utility and limitations of the pain behaviour construct, Pain, 31, 277, 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90158-8 Pain Society. Report of a working party of the Pain Society of Great Britain and Ireland: Desirable Criteria for Pain Management Programmes. Pain Society, London; 1997. Watson PJ. Interdisciplinary pain management in fibromyalgia. In: Chaitow L, editor. Fibromyalgia: a practitioners guide to treatment, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Harcourt Brace; 2003. Peat, 2001, Pain management programme follow-ups: a national survey of current practice in the United Kingdom, J. Pain Symptom Manage., 21, 218, 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00259-1 Romano, 1991, Sequential analysis of chronic pain behaviours and spouse responses, J. Consulting Clin. Psychol., 60, 777, 10.1037/0022-006X.60.5.777 Keefe, 1982, Development of an observational method for assessing pain behaviour in chronic low back pain patients, Behav. Therapy, 13, 363, 10.1016/S0005-7894(82)80001-4 Watson, 1997, The development of a functional task orientated measure of pain behaviour in chronic low back pain patients, J. Back Musculoskeletal Rehab., 9, 57, 10.1016/S1053-8127(97)00052-3 Vlaeyen, 1987, Dimensions and components of observed chronic pain behaviour, Pain, 31, 65, 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90007-8 Simmonds M. Physical function and physical performance in patients with pain: what are the measures and what do they mean? In: Max M, editor. Pain 1999—an updated review. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999. Keefe, 1992, Pain behaviour concepts and controversies, Am. Pain Soc. J., 1, 92 Koho, 2001, Assessment of chronic pain behaviour: reliability of the method and its relationship with perceived disability, physical impairment and function, J. Rehab. Med., 33, 128, 10.1080/165019701750165970 Prkachin, 2002, Real-time assessment of pain behavior during clinical assessment of low back pain patients, Pain, 95, 23, 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00369-4 Bland, 2002, Statistics notes: validating scales and indexes, Br. Med. J., 324, 606, 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.606 Harding, 1994, The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients, Pain, 58, 367, 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90131-7 Sweet CA. Presentation to Rheumatology Forum. University of Manchester; 1995. Dworkin SF, Whitney CW. Relying on objective and subjective measures of chronic pain: guidelines for use and interpretation. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editors. Handbook of pain assessment. New York: The Guildford Press; 1992. Brennan P, Silman. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. Br Med J 1991;304:1491–4. Roland, 1983, A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1a: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain, Spine, 8, 141, 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 McDaniel, 1986, Development of an observation method for assessing pain behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis patients, Pain, 24, 165, 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90039-4 Keefe FJ, Williams DA. Assessment of pain behaviours. In: Turk DC, Melzack R, editors. Handbook of Pain Assessment. London: The Guildford Press; 1992. Keefe, 1987, Osteoarthritic knee pain: a behavioural analysis, Pain, 28, 309, 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90066-2 Main, 1998, Behavioral responses to examination. A reappraisal of the interpretation of “non-organic signs”, Spine, 23, 2367, 10.1097/00007632-199811010-00025 Prkachin, 2002, Assessing pain behaviour of low-back pain patients in real time: concurrent validity and examiner sensitivity, Behav. Res. Therapy, 40, 595, 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00075-4