The developing field of technology education: a review to look forward
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Banks, F. (2009). Research on teaching and learning in technology education. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 373–390). Rotterdam: Sense.
Banks, F., Barlex, D., Jarvinen, E.-M., O’Sullivan, G., Owen-Jackson, G., & Rutland, M. (2004). DEPTH: Developing professional thinking for technology teachers: An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(3), 141–157.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553.
Bell, B., Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1995). The development of the recent national New Zealand science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 26, 73–105.
Benson, C. (2009). Design and technology: A ‘new’ subject for the English national curriculum. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 17–30). Rotterdam: Sense.
Black, P. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: Falmer.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London, UK: King’s College London, Department of Education and Professional Studies.
Carr, M., Jones, C., Lee, W., Smith, A. B., Marshall, K., & Duncan, J. (2010). Learning in the making: Dispositions and design in early education. Rotterdam: Sense.
Carr, M., McGee, C., Jones, A., McKinley, E., Bell, B., Barr, H., et al. (2000). The effects of curricula and assessment on pedagogical approaches and on educational outcomes. Literature review. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Cobb, P. (1996). Where is the mind? A coordination of sociocultural and cognitive constructivist perspectives. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 34–52). New York: Teachers College.
Cobb, P. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2/3), 187–216.
Corrigan, D. J. (1999). Industry and technology links with chemistry curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australia: Monash University.
Cowie, B. (2003). Learning perspectives: Implications for pedagogy in science education. Waikato Journal of Education, 9, 65–75.
Cowie, B., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2011). Re-engaging students in science: Issues of assessment, funds of knowledge and sites for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 347–366.
Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2009). Methodological considerations in studying classroom interactions in technology education. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 625–635). Rotterdam: Sense.
Cowie, B., Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). The classroom InSiTE project: Understanding classroom interactions to enhance teaching and learning in science and technology. Teaching and learning research initiative (Final Report). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
DATA. (2003). Minimum competences for trainees to teach design and technology in secondary schools. Research Paper No. 4. Wellesbourne, UK: Author.
de Vries, M. (2000). Can we train researchers and teachers to make a team? Win-win strategies in technology education. Paper presented to the 1st Biennial International Technology Education Research Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.
de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Ding, B. (2009). The development of technology education in Mainland China. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 131–137). Rotterdam: Sense.
Driver, R. (1995). Constructive approaches to science teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 385–400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dugger, W. E., Jr. (2009). Developments in technology education in the United States of America. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 65–84). Rotterdam: Sense.
Fensham, P. J. (1987). Physical science, society and technology: A case study in the sociology of education. In K. Riquarts (Ed.), Science and technology education and the quality of life (Vol. 2, pp. 714–723). Kiel: University of Kiel, Institute for Science Education.
Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice. New York: Teachers College.
Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College.
Gardner, P. (1995). Representations of the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 24, 1–28.
Ginestié, J. (2009a). Thinking about technology education in France. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 41–50). Rotterdam: Sense.
Ginestié, J. (2009b). Training technology teachers in Europe. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 569–580). Rotterdam: Sense.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Maidenhead, UK: Open University.
Harlen, W. (1997). Confidence rising slowly: Primary teachers’ feelings about science and technology. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding in teaching science and technology in primary schools. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Hextall, I., & Mahony, P. (1998). Effective teachers for effective schools. In R. Slee, G. Weiner, & S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom? Challenges to the effectiveness and school improvement movements (pp. 128–143). London: Falmer.
Hill, A. M. (2009). The study of technology in Canada. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 85–92). Rotterdam: Sense.
Hodson, D. (2009). Technology in science-technology-society-environment (STSE) education: Introductory remarks. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 325–333). Rotterdam: Sense.
Hyland, T. (1993). Professional development and competence-based education. Educational Studies, 19(1), 123–132.
ITEA. (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
Jones, A. (1997). Recent research in student learning of technological concepts and processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 83–96.
Jones, A. (2007). The valuing of technology in the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunston (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 89–100). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jones, A. (2009). Towards an articulation of students making progress in learning technological concepts and processes. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 407–417). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers’ perceptions of technology education—implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22, 230–239.
Jones, A., & Compton, V. (1998). Towards a model for teacher development in technology education: From research to practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 51–65.
Jones, A., & Compton, V. (2009). Reviewing the field of technology education in New Zealand. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 105–116). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jones, A. T., & de Vries, M. J. (Eds.). (2009). International handbook of research and development in technology education. Rotterdam: Sense.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2003). Considering pedagogical content knowledge in the context of research on teaching: An example from technology. Waikato Journal of Education, 9, 77–89.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 121–140.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case study of a whole school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 193–206.
Kananoja, T. (2009). Technology education in general education in Finland. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 51–64). Rotterdam: Sense.
Kimbell, R. (2009). Performance portfolios… problems, potentials, and policy. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 509–522). Rotterdam: Sense.
Kimbell, R., Wheeler, T., Miller, S., & Pollitt, A. (2007). e-Scape portfolio assessment: A research and development project for the department for education & skills (DfES) and the qualifications and curriculum authority (QCA). Phase 2 report. London: Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths, University of London.
Kimbell, R., Wheeler, T., Shepard, T., Brown-Martin, G., Perry, D., Hall, P., et al. (2005). e-scape portfolio assessment: A research and development project for the department for education and skills (DfES) and the qualifications and curriculum authority (QCA). Phase 1 report. London: Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths, University of London.
Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons: Engaging with the social context of science in schools. London: Wellcome Trust. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Education/WTD003435.htm . Accessed 1 September 2010.
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labour: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University and the Russell Sage Foundation.
Lewis, T. (1999). Research in technology education—some areas of need. Journal of Technology Education, 11(1), 41–56.
Lingard, B., Hayes, D., Mills, M., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading learning: Making hope practical in schools. Maidenhead, UK: Open University.
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 141–159.
McCormick, R. (2009). Learning and teaching: An introduction. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 363–371). Rotterdam: Sense.
McWilliam, E. (2008). Making excellent teachers. In A. Phelan & J. Sumison (Eds.), Critical readings in teacher education (pp. 33–44). Rotterdam: Sense.
Middleton, H. (2009). Technology education and research in Australia: A coming of age in the 21st century. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 93–104). Rotterdam: Sense.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University.
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Moreland, J. (2009). Assessment: Focusing on the learner and the subject. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 445–447). Rotterdam: Sense.
Moreland, J., & Cowie, B. (2009). Making meaning in primary technology classrooms through assessment for learning. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 461–476). Rotterdam: Sense.
Moreland, J., Cowie, B., & Jones, A. (2007). Assessment for learning practices in primary technology classrooms. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 12(2), 37–48.
Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Barlex, D. (2008). Design and technology inside the black box. London: GL Assessment.
Natarajan, C., & Chunawala, S. (2009). Technology and vocational education in India. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 117–130). Rotterdam: Sense.
NFG-W&E. (2007). Position paper of the national focus group on work and education. New Delhi: NCERT.
Novak, J. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167–193.
Olson, J., & Henning Hansen, K. (1994). Research on technology education. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education (Vol. V, pp. 225–239). Paris: UNESCO.
Oulton, C. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411–423.
Pedretti, E. G., Bencze, L., Hewitt, J., Romkey, L., & Jivraj, A. (2008). Promoting issues-based STSE perspectives in science teacher education: Problems of identity and ideology. Science & Education, 17(8&9), 941–960.
Petrina, S. (1998). The politics of research in technology education: A critical content and discourse analysis of the Journal of Technology Education, Volumes 1–8. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 27–57.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1998). A scheme of work for KS 1, 2, 3: Design and technology. London: Author.
Robitaille, D., & Dirks, M. (1982). Models for the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(3), 3–21.
Roth, W.-M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768–790.
Roth, W.-M., & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2006). Tracking situated, distributed, and embodied communication in real time. In M. A. Vanchevsky (Ed.), Focus on cognitive psychology research (pp. 237–261). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. F. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.
Smyth, J., Dow, A., Hattam, R., Reid, A., & Shacklock, G. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy. London: Falmer.
Solomon, J. (1988). Science technology and society courses: Tools for thinking about social issues. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 379–397.
Stables, K., & Kimbell, R. (2000). The unpickled portfolio: Pioneering performance assessment in design and technology. In R. Kimbell (Ed.), D&T international millennium conference: Learning from experience: Modelling new futures (pp. 195–202). Wellesbourne, UK: DATA.
Stables, K., & Kimbell, R. (2007). Evidence through the looking glass: Developing performance and assessing capability. In L. Taxén, (Ed.), The 13th international conference on thinking. linköping electronic conference proceedings, No. 21 (pp. 175–182). Norrköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press. Retrieved 10 January 2009, from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/021/vol1/175-182 .
Stevens, A. (2009). The introduction and development of technology education in South Africa. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 131–137). Rotterdam: Sense.
UNESCO. (2005). Education for all global monitoring report 2005. http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=35939&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html . Accessed 10 January 2009.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University.
Williams, P. J. (2009). Teacher education. In A. T. Jones & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 531–540). Rotterdam: Sense.
Yost, D. S., Sentner, S. M., & Forlenza-Baily, A. (2000). An examination of the construct of critical reflection: Implications for teacher education programming in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(1), 39–49.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework of socioscientific issues in education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.
Zuga, K. F. (1997). An analysis of technology education research in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 203–217.