The determinants of reliable smart grid from experts’ perspective

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 - Trang 1-23 - 2023
Ibrahim Mashal1, Osama A. Khashan2, Mohammad Hijjawi1, Mohammad Alshinwan1
1Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
2Research and Innovation Centers, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Tóm tắt

A smart grid integrates communication networks with the conventional electrical grid. Due to their potential, smart grids are anticipated to achieve widespread deployment. A key component of the success and adoption of smart grids is reliability. Without knowing users’ impressions of the reliability of the smart grid, users will not easily accept and participate in it or its services. However, very few studies address smart grid reliability from the perspective of users. Thus, there is a urgent need to identify key factors that affect smart grid reliability from the user’s viewpoint. The goal of this paper is to examine user perceptions of smart grid reliability and assess their success factors in an effort to close the gap in the literature. This paper propose a model to investigate and determine the most crucial factors that affect the smart grid's reliability based on the Multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. Firstly, a comprehensive literature analysis was conducted to determine the criteria and sub-criteria used to construct the model; then, the model is constructed using fifteen sub-criteria covering big data, network systems, and grid efficiency criteria; finally, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Approach (FAHP) and fuzzy triangular numbers are used to evaluate and prioritize the criteria. Twenty smart grid experts were consulted to collect data. The results indicate the significance of the ‘Big Data’ criterion, closely followed by ‘Grid Efficiency’ criterion. Additionally, it is discovered that the sub-criteria of ‘Privacy’ and ‘Interoperability’ had a significant impact on the reliability of the smart grid. The sensitivity analysis shows the variation of factors ranking and the stability and robustness of the model and the results. The research presented in this study has practical applications for academics, engineers, decision-makers, and stakeholders.

Tài liệu tham khảo

AlAbdulkarim L, Lukszo Z, Fens T. Acceptance of privacy-sensitive technologies: smart metering case in the Netherlands. In: Third international engineering systems symposium CESUN. 2012. Alam S, Sohail MF, Ghauri SA, Qureshi IM, Aqdas N (2017) Cognitive radio based smart grid communication network. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:535–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.086 Alaqeel TA, Suryanarayanan S (2018) A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process algorithm to prioritize smart grid technologies for the Saudi electricity infrastructure. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 13:122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2017.12.010 Alsalem M, Zaidan A, Zaidan B, Hashim M, Albahri OS, Albahri AS, Hadi A, Mohammed K (2018) Systematic review of an automated multiclass detection and classification system for acute Leukaemia in terms of evaluation and benchmarking, open challenges, issues and methodological aspects. J Med Syst 42:1–36 Ancillotti E, Bruno R, Conti M (2013) The role of communication systems in smart grids: architectures, technical solutions and research challenges. Comput Commun 36(17):1665–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2013.09.004 Balali A, Valipour A (2021) Prioritization of passive measures for energy optimization designing of sustainable hospitals and health centres. J Build Eng 35:101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101992 Balali A, Hakimelahi A, Valipour A (2020) Identification and prioritization of passive energy consumption optimization measures in the building industry: an Iranian case study. J Build Eng 30:101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101239 Balali A, Yunusa-Kaltungo A, Edwards R (2023) A systematic review of passive energy consumption optimisation strategy selection for buildings through multiple criteria decision-making techniques. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 171:113013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113013 Bamberger Y, Baptista J, Belmans R, Buchholz BM, Chebbo M, Doblado JL, Efthymiou V, Gallo L, Handschin E, Hatziargyriou N (2006). Vision and strategy for europe’s electricity networks of the future: European Technology PlatformSmartGrids Bari A, Jiang J, Saad W, Jaekel A (2014) Challenges in the smart grid applications: an overview. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 10(2):974682 Basílio MP, Pereira V, Costa HG, Santos M, Ghosh A (2022) A systematic review of the applications of multi-criteria decision aid methods (1977–2022). Electronics 11(11):1720 Bayindir R, Colak I, Fulli G, Demirtas K (2016) Smart grid technologies and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66:499–516 Bian D, Kuzlu M, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S, Shi D (2019) Performance evaluation of communication technologies and network structure for smart grid applications. IET Commun 13(8):1025–1033 Bohra SS, Anvari-Moghaddam A (2022) A comprehensive review on applications of multicriteria decision-making methods in power and energy systems. Int J Energy Res 46(4):4088–4118 Broman Toft M, Schuitema G, Thøgersen J (2014) The importance of framing for consumer acceptance of the smart grid: a comparative study of Denmark, Norway and Switzerland. Energy Res Soc Sci 3:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.010 Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 Chou SW, Chang YC (2008) The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits. Decis Support Syst 46(1):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003 Chou JS, Yutami IG (2014) Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia. Appl Energy 128:336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.083 Dagtekin Y, Kaya S, Besli N (2022) Distributed energy system selection for a commercial building by using multi criteria decision making methods. Int J Hydrog Energy 47(86):36672–36692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.208 Daki H, El Hannani A, Aqqal A, Haidine A, Dahbi A (2017) Big Data management in smart grid: concepts, requirements and implementation. J Big Data 4(1):1–19 Department of Energy U (2009). 2010 Smart grid system report Diamantoulakis PD, Kapinas VM, Karagiannidis GK (2015) Big data analytics for dynamic energy management in smart grids. Big Data Res 2(3):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2015.03.003 Dileep G (2020) A survey on smart grid technologies and applications. Renew Energy 146:2589–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.092 Dong J, Huo H, Guo S (2016) Demand side management performance evaluation for commercial enterprises. Sustainability 8(10):1041 Dong J, Huo H, Liu D, Li R (2017) Evaluating the comprehensive performance of demand response for commercial customers by applying combination weighting techniques and fuzzy VIKOR approach. Sustainability 9(8):1332 Dong J, Li R, Huang H (2018) Performance evaluation of residential demand response based on a modified fuzzy VIKOR and scalable computing method. Energies 11(5):1097 Estévez RA, Espinoza V, Ponce Oliva RD, Vásquez-Lavín F, Gelcich S (2021) Multi-criteria decision analysis for renewable energies: research trends, gaps and the challenge of improving participation. Sustainability 13(6):3515 Fan X, Gong G (2013) Security challenges in smart-grid metering and control systems. Technol Innov Manag Rev 3(7):42 Fang X, Misra S, Xue G, Yang D (2012) Smart Grid—The new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 14(4):944–980. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.101911.00087 Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108(1):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0 Gao J, Xiao Y, Liu J, Liang W, Chen CLP (2012) A survey of communication/networking in smart grids. Future Gener Comput Syst 28(2):391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.04.014 Gârdan IP, Micu A, Paștiu CA, Micu AE, Gârdan DA (2023) Consumers’ attitude towards renewable energy in the context of the energy crisis. Energies 16(2):676 Ghasempour A (2019) Internet of things in smart grid: architecture, applications, services, key technologies, and challenges. Inventions 4(1):22 Govindan K, Kaliyan M, Kannan D, Haq AN (2014) Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 147:555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.018 Haddad B, Liazid A, Ferreira P (2017) A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renew Energy 107:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.035 Hasan Ghodusinejad M, Ghodrati A, Zahedi R, Yousefi H (2022) Multi-criteria modeling and assessment of PV system performance in different climate areas of Iran. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 53:102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102520 Hasheminasab H, Streimikiene D, Pishahang M (2023) A novel energy poverty evaluation: study of the European Union countries. Energy 264:126157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126157 Hashmi M, Hänninen S, Mäki K (2011) Survey of smart grid concepts, architectures, and technological demonstrations worldwide. In: 2011 IEEE PES conference on innovative smart grid technologies Latin America (ISGT LA) Hawk C, Kaushiva A (2014) Cybersecurity and the smarter grid. Electr J 27(8):84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2014.08.008 Heile B (2010) Smart grids for green communications [industry perspectives]. IEEE Wirel Commun 17(3):4–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2010.5490972 Ilbahar E, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2019) A state-of-the-art review on multi-attribute renewable energy decision making. Energy Strategy Rev 25:18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.014 Jain P, Gyanchandani M, Khare N (2016) Big data privacy: a technological perspective and review. J Big Data 3(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0059-y Jaradat M, Jarrah M, Bousselham A, Jararweh Y, Al-Ayyoub M (2015) The internet of energy: smart sensor networks and big data management for smart grid. Proc Comp Sci 56:592–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.250 Kim M (2012) A survey on guaranteeing availability in smart grid communications. In: 2012 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) Krishankumar R, Pamucar D, Deveci M, Aggarwal M, Ravichandran KS (2022) Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach. Renew Energy 189:1428–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.081 Kuzlu M, Pipattanasomporn M (2013) Assessment of communication technologies and network requirements for different smart grid applications. In: 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) Kuzlu M, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S (2014) Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN. Comp Netw 67:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.029 Lakshmi BM, Mathew M, Kinol AMJ, Vedagiri B, Perumal SB, Madhu P, Dhanalakshmi CS (2022) An integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS- and Entropy-TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking approach for evaluating green energy sources and its experimental analysis on pyrolysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(40):61370–61382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20219-9 Léonard C, Chartres S, Chiappini F, Drouineau M, Nekrassov A, Hadjsaïd N (2016) Methodology, results and key success factors of Smart grid assessment in France. In: 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) Lin CY, Chau KY, Moslehpour M, Linh HV, Duong KD, Ngo TQ (2022) Factors influencing the sustainable energy technologies adaptation in ASEAN countries. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 53:102668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102668 Lněnička M (2015) AHP model for the big data analytics platform selection. Acta Inform Prag 4(2):108–121 Luthra S, Kumar S, Kharb R, Ansari MF, Shimmi SL (2014) Adoption of smart grid technologies: an analysis of interactions among barriers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:554–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.030 Ma S, Zhang H, Xing X (2018) Scalability for smart infrastructure system in smart grid: a survey. Wirel Pers Commun 99(1):161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5045-y Manirambona E, Talai SM, Kimutai SK (2022) Sustainability evaluation of power generation technologies using multi-criteria decision making: the Kenyan case. Energy Rep 8:14901–14914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.055 Mashal I (2021) Evaluation and assessment of smart grid reliability using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making. In: Rahmani-Andebili M (ed) Applications of fuzzy logic in planning and operation of smart grids. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 67–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64627-1_3 Mashal I (2022) Smart grid reliability evaluation and assessment. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2020-0910 Mashal I, Alsaryrah O, Chung T-Y, Yang C-Z, Kuo W-H, Agrawal DP (2015) Choices for interaction with things on Internet and underlying issues. Ad Hoc Netw 28:68–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.12.006 Mashal I, Shuhaiber A, Daoud M (2020) Factors influencing the acceptance of smart homes in Jordan. Int J Electron Mark Retail 11(2):113–142 Mohammadzadeh AK, Ghafoori S, Mohammadian A, Mohammadkazemi R, Mahbanooei B, Ghasemi R (2018) A Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP) approach for prioritizing internet of things challenges in Iran. Technol Soc 53:124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.01.007 Mokhtar MR, Abdullah MP, Hassan MY, Hussin F (2015) Combination of AHP-PROMETHEE and TOPSIS for selecting the best Demand Side Management (DSM) options. In: 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) Moslehi K, Kumar R (2010) Smart Grid—a reliability perspective. In: 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT) Nadizadeh Shorabeh S, Argany M, Rabiei J, Karimi Firozjaei H, Nematollahi O (2021) Potential assessment of multi-renewable energy farms establishment using spatial multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study and mapping in Iran. J Clean Prod 295:126318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126318 Narayanamoorthy S, Brainy JV, Shalwala RA, Alsenani TR, Ahmadian A, Kang D (2023) An enhanced fuzzy decision making approach for the assessment of sustainable energy storage systems. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 33:100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2022.100962 Naseem A, Ullah K, Akram M, Božanić D, Ćirović G (2022) Assessment of smart grid systems for electricity using power maclaurin symmetric mean operators based on T-spherical fuzzy information. Energies 15(21):7826 Nga DV, See OH, Xuen CY, Chee LL (2012) Visualization techniques in smart grid. Smart Grid Renew Energy 3(03):175 Ourahou M, Ayrir W, El Hassouni B, Haddi A (2020) Review on smart grid control and reliability in presence of renewable energies: Challenges and prospects. Math Comput Simul 167:19–31 Pokorni SJ (2019) Reliability and availability of the internet of things. Vojnoteh Glas 67(3):588–600 Ponce P, Polasko K, Molina A (2016) End user perceptions toward smart grid technology: acceptance, adoption, risks, and trust. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.101 Qarabsh NA, Sabry SS, Qarabash HA (2020) Smart grid in the context of industry 40: an overview of communications technologies and challenges. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 18(2):656–665 Raimi KT, Carrico AR (2016) Understanding and beliefs about smart energy technology. Energy Res Soc Sci 12:68–74 Rehmani MH, Reisslein M, Rachedi A, Erol-Kantarci M, Radenkovic M (2018) Integrating renewable energy resources into the smart grid: Recent developments in information and communication technologies. IEEE Trans Indus Infor 14(7):2814–2825 Rodriguez-Calvo A, Cossent R, Frías P (2018) Scalability and replicability analysis of large-scale smart grid implementations: approaches and proposals in Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 93:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.041 Saleem Y, Crespi N, Rehmani MH, Copeland R (2019) Internet of things-aided smart grid: technologies, architectures, applications, prototypes, and future research directions. IEEE Access 7:62962–63003. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913984 Sanchez A, Rivera W (2017) Big data analysis and visualization for the smart grid. In: 2017 IEEE International congress on big data (big data congress) Sanchez-Hidalgo M-A, Cano M-D (2018) A survey on visual data representation for smart grids control and monitoring. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 16:351–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2018.09.007 Shayani Mehr P, Hafezalkotob A, Fardi K, Seiti H, Movahedi Sobhani F, Hafezalkotob A (2022) A comprehensive framework for solar panel technology selection: A BWM- MULTIMOOSRAL approach. Energy Sci Eng 10(12):4595–4625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1292 Shuhaiber A, Mashal I (2019) Understanding users’ acceptance of smart homes. Technol Soc 58:101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.01.003 Siddiqa A, Karim A, Gani A (2017) Big data storage technologies: a survey. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng 18(8):1040–1070. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1500441 Sigrist L, May K, Morch A, Verboven P, Vingerhoets P, Rouco L (2016) On scalability and replicability of smart grid projects—a case study. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030195 Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D (2020) Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for the assessment of renewable energy technologies in a household: a review. Energies 13(5):1164 Soomro H, Shah SF, Sahito WS, Uqaili MA, Kumar L, Nixon JD, Harijan K (2022) Assessment of sustainable biomass energy technologies in Pakistan using the analytical hierarchy process. Sustainability 14(18):11388 Stefan M, Lopez JG, Andreasen MH, Olsen RL (2017) Visualization techniques for electrical grid smart metering data: a survey. In: 2017 IEEE third international conference on big data computing service and applications (bigdataservice) Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Puška A, Chatterjee P (2020) Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Comput Ind Eng 140:106231 Taylan O, Alamoudi R, Kabli M, AlJifri A, Ramzi F, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) Assessment of energy systems using extended fuzzy AHP, fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS approaches to manage non-cooperative opinions. Sustainability 12(7):2745 Tightiz L, Yang H, Piran MJ (2020) A survey on enhanced smart micro-grid management system with modern wireless technology contribution. Energies 13(9):2258 Triantaphyllou E, Sánchez A (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods*. Decis Sci 28(1):151–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01306.x Usman M, Jonas D, Frey G (2022) A methodology for multi-criteria assessment of renewable integrated energy supply options and alternative HVAC systems in a household. Energy Build 273:112397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112397 van Laarhoven PJ, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7 Wang L (2017) Heterogeneous data and big data analytics. Autom Control Inform Sci 3(1):8–15 Wang Y, Chen Q, Hong T, Kang C (2019) Review of smart meter data analytics: applications, methodologies, and challenges. IEEE Transact Smart Grid 10(3):3125–3148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2818167 Yan Y, Qian Y, Sharif H, Tipper D (2013) A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: motivations, requirements and challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(1):5–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.021312.00034 Yazdani M, Zavadskas EK, Ignatius J, Abad MD (2016) Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: application of material selection. Eng Econ 27(4):382–391 Yousefi H, Ghodusinejad MH, Ghodrati A (2022) Multi-criteria future energy system planning and analysis for hot arid areas of Iran. Energies 15(24):9405 Zhao H, Guo S (2015) External benefit evaluation of renewable energy power in China for sustainability. Sustainability 7(5):4783–4805 Zhao H, Li N (2016) Performance evaluation for sustainability of strong smart grid by using stochastic AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Sustainability 8(2):129 Zhao H, Zhao H, Guo S (2018) Comprehensive performance evaluation of electricity grid corporations employing a novel MCDM model. Sustainability 10(7):2130